Case law

Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. Johnson

99 Va. 282 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Mar 21, 1901

But it is contended that under section 3453 of the Code there may be an appeal of right from any order of a county court in a controversy concerning a roadway, and in support of this proposition Jeter v. … Board, 27 Gratt. 920 , is relied on.

LOVELL v. RAFFENSPERGER

318 Ga. 48 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 17, 2024

In analyzing this question, we begin with the text of Paragraph V (b) (2), which provides: Actions filed pursuant to this Paragraph against this state or any agency, authority, branch, board, bureau … Here, Appellants named as defendants the Secretary, not the State of Georgia, and their local boards of election and their board members, not the relevant counties.

Brown v. Brown

429 So. 2d 846 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 20, 1983

429 So.2d 846 (1983) Daniel Joseph BROWN, Appellant, v. Catherine Mary BROWN, Appellee. No. 82-950. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. April 20, 1983. *847 Clifford M. … In Ball v.

Brown v. Brown

169 Ga. 580 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Dec 13, 1929

Robert Brown filed suit for divorce against his wife, Mary Brown, on February 11, 1929, alleging cruel treatment by her. … See Smith v. Smith, 162 Ga. 349 ( 133 S. E. 842 ); Dougherty v. Dougherty, 150 Ga. 206 ( 103 S. E. 168 ).

Brown v. Brown

34 A.D.2d 727 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 1970

(People v. De Renzzio, 19 N Y 2d 45, 50-51; People v. Friola, 11 N Y 2d 157, 159; Von Diezleski v. Food Fair Stores, 18 A D 2d 724.)

Brown v. Brown

591 So. 2d 1043 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 26, 1991

In Cameron v. … See also, Villaverde v. Villaverde, 547 So.2d 185 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Brown v. Brown

38 N.C. App. 607 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 7, 1978

Ratliff v. Duke Power Co., 268 N.C. 605 , 151 S.E. 2d 641 (1966); McNamara v. Outlaw, 262 N.C. 612 , 138 S.E. 2d 287 (1964). … Farmers Oil Co. v. Miller, 264 N.C. 101 , 141 S.E. 2d 41 (1965); Eason v. Grimsley, 255 N.C. 494 , 121 S.E. 2d 885 (1961).

Brown v. Brown

84 So. 3d 170 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Aug 6, 2010

84 So.3d 170 (2010) HAROLD BROWN v. MARIAN BROWN. No. 2090565. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. August 6, 2010. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Affirmed.

Brown v. Brown

192 Mich. App. 44 · Michigan Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1991

We agree with the reasoning in two decisions issued by panels of the Court of Appeals, Jewett v Jewett, 172 Mich App 391 ; 431 NW2d 523 (1988), and Olepa v Olepa, 151 Mich App 690 ; 391 NW2d 446 (1986). … Jewett, supra; Olepa, supra. *46 We note that another panel of this Court reached a different conclusion in Attard v Adamczyk, 141 Mich App 246 ; 367 NW2d 75 (1985), apparently premising its decision on the fact that a divorce

Brown v. Brown

112 N.C. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1993

Bryson v. Sullivan, 330 N.C. 644 , 412 S.E.2d 327 (1992). In Turner v. … Turner v. Duke Univ., 325 N.C. 152, 165 , 381 S.E.2d 706, 714 (1989).

Brown v. Brown

181 N.C. App. 333 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 2, 2007

See Brown v. Brown, 171 N.C. App. 358 , 615 S.E.2d 39 (2005); Brown v. Brown, 171 N.C. … In Brown v. Brown, 171 N.C.

Marin-Brown v. Brown

79 A.D.3d 1302 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 2010

AD3d 1008, 1009 [2007], quoting Curtis v Curtis, 20 AD3d 653, 654 [2005]; see Christian v Christian, 42 NY2d 63, 71 [1977]; accord Smith v Smith, 75 AD3d 784, 786 [2010]). … v Lounshury, 300 AD2d 812, 814 [2002]).

Brown v. Brown

101 Nev. 144 · Nevada Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1985

We remanded the matter to the district court to allow it to reconsider its decree in view of McCarty v. McCarty, 453 U.S. 210 (1981). … While the courts have inherent power “to protect and defend their decrees by contempt proceedings,” Noble v. Noble, 86 Nev. 459, 463 , 470 P.2d 430, 432 (1970), courts are, nevertheless, bound by statute.

Fletcher v. Harrington (In re Soundview Elite Ltd.)

512 B.R. 155 · District Court, S.D. New York · Apr 23, 2014

Green v. … Etheredge-Brown v. Am. Media, Inc., 13 Civ.l982(JPO), 2014 WL 1316352, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2014) (citing Greenwood v. State of N.Y. Office of Mental Health, 842 F.2d 636, 639 (2d Cir.1988)).

Roberts v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

719 A.2d 847 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1998

Mancini’s Bakery v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Leone), 155 Pa.Cmwlth. 641 , 625 A.2d 1308 (1993). … Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Volkswagen of America), 121 Pa.Cmwlth. 436 , 550 A.2d 1364 (1988).

Brown v. Brown

169 Cal. App. 2d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1959

. * This is an appeal by Frank Brown and Ernestine Brown, plaintiffs, from an order made and entered on May 14, 1957, granting the motion of the defendants, Lawrence Brown and Sara E. Brown, doing business as “B. & B. … In Baird v.

Kleiger-Brown v. Brown

306 A.D.2d 482 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 2003

Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 NY2d 343, 349 [1999] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Ryan v New York Tel. … Corp. v Lopez, 46 NY2d 481, 485 [1979]). Here, the father’s contention with respect to child support was determined in a prior appeal (see Brown v Brown, 239 AD2d 535 [1997]).

Brown v. Brown

82 Tenn. 253 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1884

Benjamin Brown died in 1857. An instrument in writing, purporting to be his will, was duly proved as such in common form by the persons named as executors therein, who qualified accordingly. … Brown was appointed administrator of'the decedent’s estate.

Brown v. Brown

402 So. 2d 344 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1981

Brown v. Brown

30 S.W.2d 1110 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 11, 1930

Brown, should prevail. LI J In view of these several conditions, it is of importance to ascertain the intention of the parties in order that it may be determined when the sale took place. In Woods v. … Hickman v. Hickman (Tex. Civ. App.) 20 S.W.(2d) 1073 , and numerous authorities there cited. For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.