Case law

Bauer v. Board of Election Commissioners

198 S.W.3d 161 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2006

Bagsby v. Gehres, 169 S.W.3d 543, 547 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). … Wrenn v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 923 S.W.2d 423, 425 (Mo.App.

Ode v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

796 S.W.2d 81 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1990

Franklin v. Board of Directors, 772 S.W.2d 873, 877 (Mo.App.1989). … Wolfner v. Board of Adjustment, 672 S.W.2d 147, 150 (Mo.App.1984); Stockwell v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 434 S.W.2d 785, 789 (Mo.App.1968).

Snelson v. Board of Police Commissioners

859 S.W.2d 794 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1993

Village North, Inc. v. … Valentine v. Board of Police Comm’rs of Kansas City, 813 S.W.2d 955, 957 (Mo.App.1991). .

Jackson v. MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE

308 S.W.3d 786 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 2010

Jackson appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County dismissing his Petition for Administrative Review and Trial De Novo, in which Jackson sought judicial review of the decision of the Missouri Board of Probation

City of Edina v. Brown

19 Mo. App. 672 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1885

Reference is made to Missouri City v.

Liddell v. Board of Education

758 F. Supp. 499 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 18, 1991

Liddell V, 677 F.2d 626, 636 (8th Cir.1982), cert. den. 459 U.S. 877 , 103 S.Ct. 172 , 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982) and Liddell XI, 822 F.2d 1446 , 1455 (8th Cir.1987). … Liddell V, at 636, n. 21; Liddell XI, at 1455, n. 18.

Liddell v. Board of Education

795 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 7, 1992

The Court has carefully reviewed City Board’s proposed plans, budget and implementation schedule. … The Court also has the benefit of Amicus Shu-lamith Simon’s observations conveyed to the Court pursuant to G(283)92, and of the State of Missouri’s response to City Board’s report, G(288)92, and City Board’s reply, G(307)

Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.

212 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 14, 1963

Of course, there is general language in Becker v. … And also see Lonergan v.

Brown v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

212 Mo. App. 541 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 1923

[Hays v. Railroad, 177 Mo. App. 201 , l. c. 213, 219, 162 S. W. 266 ; Brown v. Railroad, 198 Mo. App. 71 , 199 S. W. 707 .] … [Cox v. Railroad, 174 Mo. 588 , 74 S. W. 854 ; Skinner v. Railroad, 254 Mo. 228 , 162 S. W. 237 ; Murphy v. Railroad, 205 Mo. App. 682 , 226 S. W. 637 .] Overflow water is surface water (Goll v.

State ex rel. Brown v. Antonio

481 S.W.2d 619 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1972

Respondent and an intervening taxpayer contend that relator has not exhausted his administrative remedies through the County Board of Equalization and the State Tax Commission under the provisions of Chapter 138 RSMo 1969 … Koplar v. State Tax Commission, Mo., 321 S.W.2d 686 [1]; State ex rel. Kahler v. State Tax Commission, Mo., 393 S.W.2d 460 [1]. The Supreme Court *620 is vested with exclusive jurisdiction in such cases.

Webb v. Board of Police Commissioners

736 S.W.2d 451 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1987

Webb v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, 694 S.W.2d 927, 929 (Mo.App.1985). We remanded to the Board for specific findings of fact on all contested issues. … Reed v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, 664 S.W.2d 650, 653 (Mo.App.1984); see also, Mills v. Federal Soldiers Home, 549 S.W.2d 862, 867 (Mo. banc 1977); Arnold v. McLeod, 720 S.W.2d 385, 387 (Mo.App.1986).

Brown v. Holland Furnace Co.

214 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 21, 1963

Brown for which he claimed and was paid several thousands of dollars for personal injuries. … Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474 , 55 S.Ct. 296 , 79 L.Ed. 603 , 95 A.L.R. 1150 (inadequacy claimed); Fairmount Glass Works v.

Board of Trustees v. Attorney-General

228 Mo. 514 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 31, 1910

The charter gives to the board of trustees the power to fill vacancies, thus making the board self-perpetuating; it also gives them power to create vacancies by removal from office, but although now a difference has arisen … Section 3 of this article declares that “The board of trustees shall have oversight, approval and direction of all endowment funds, of all real estate and personal property, and of all loans made of them.”

Eckmann v. Board of Education

106 F.R.D. 70 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 14, 1985

In Perrignon v. … United States v. Luther, 481 F.2d 429, 432 (9th Cir.1973); United States v. Wells, 446 F.2d 2, 4 (2d Cir.1971); Mullen v. United States, 263 F.2d 275, 277-80 (D.C.Cir.1958).

Liddell v. Board of Education

654 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 27, 1987

Several parties have filed responses: L(1295)87 — Desegregation Monitoring and Advisory Committee (DMAC); L(1296)87— United States; L(1298)87 — Liddell plaintiffs; L(1299)87 and L(1300)87 — City Board; L(1301)87 — Intervenor … See, Liddell v. Board of Education, City of St. Louis, 677 F.2d 626, 636 (8th Cir.1982). The Special School District does not contest the jurisdiction of the Court to order the closing of West County Tech.

Dunbar v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

380 S.W.2d 442 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1964

Curtin v. Zerbst Pharmacal Co., 333 Mo. 346 , 62 S.W.2d 771, 772 ; Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 249 S.W.2d 491, 495 ; Superior Press Brick Co. v. City of St. Louis, Mo., 152 S.W.2d 178 .” … Co. v. Kansas City Transit, Inc., Mo., 339 S.W.2d 766 ; Barnes v. Anchor Temple Assn., Mo., 369 S.W.2d 192, 193 [l-3].

Love v. Board of Police Commissioners

943 S.W.2d 862 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1997

The Board of Police Commissioners appeals from the trial court action in setting aside a previously entered judgment in favor of the Board in a suit filed against it by plaintiff. We reverse. … When the plaintiff was acquitted of the charges the Board reviewed his application to lift the suspension and denied it. Love brought an action in Circuit Court to review the Board’s action.

Meyr v. Board of Education

435 F. Supp. 1155 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 18, 1977

In Count I of her complaint, the plaintiff seeks to come within the rule laid *1157 down in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. … This Court is bound by the Supreme Court’s opinion in Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, and finds that Ms.

Hagen v. Perryville Board of Aldermen

550 S.W.2d 797 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1977

Louis v. Koontz, 516 S.W .2d 502 (Mo.App.1974); Moore v. Damos, 489 S.W.2d 465 (Mo.App.1972); State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d 150 (Mo.App.1974). … Ace Mining & Milling Co. v. R. U. Mining Co., 247 S.W. 172 (Mo.1922); State v. Ray, 225 S.W. 969 (Mo. 1920); Baker v. Baker, 274 S.W.2d 322 (Mo.App.1954); Davis v. Davis, 354 S.W.2d 526, 531 (Mo.App.1962).

Board of Public Utilities v. Fenton

669 S.W.2d 612 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1984

The transformer was the property of the plaintiff Board of Public Utilities. … Cantrell, an electrical engineer employed by the plaintiff Board of Public Utilities.