Case law

Brown v. Yaspan

256 A.D. 991 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 13, 1939

(Warschauser v. Brooklyn Furniture Co., 159 App. Div. 81 .) It also alleges one or more acts of assault. … (Schloendorff v. New York Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125 .) There may be an assault without the striking of a blow or other physical contact. (Liebstadter v. Federgreen, 80 Hun, 245 ; Hawkins v. Kuhne, 153 App. Div. 216 .)

People v. Brown

135 A.D.3d 626 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 26, 2016

People v Hesterbay, 60 AD3d 564, 566 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 916 [2009]). … the language employed by the court did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. *627 We reject defendant’s arguments concerning to the sufficiency and weight of the evidence supporting his contempt conviction (see People v

People v. Brown

225 A.D.2d 904 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 14, 1996

McNally v. Brown

5 Redf. 372 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1882

Brown’s wife, and the property in Grand avenue to his son Robert. George Miller did not read the whole of the will, only read some portions of it: Q. … Probate must therefore be refused (Sheridan v. Houghton, 6 Abb. N. C., 234 ). Decreed accordingly.

People v. Brown

52 A.D.3d 1175 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 6, 2008

Although the officer’s question was “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response” and thus constituted interrogation (Rhode Island v Innis, 446 US 291, 301 [1980]; see People v Paulman, 5 NY3d 122, 129 [2005]), … People v Kittell, 135 AD2d 1021, 1022 [1987]; see generally People v Huffman, 41 NY2d 29 , 33 [1976]).

People v. Brown

98 A.D.3d 1323 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 28, 2012

Brown v. Smallwood

86 A.D. 76 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1903

Fillmore Brown, being duly sworn, says- that he is the agent of Elizabeth T. … Judge Martin, in writing the opinion of the court, said: “ In the case of Palmer v.

Brown v. Barse

10 A.D. 444 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1896

(See Brown v. Barse, 3 App. Div. 257 .) The defendant was not present at the trial under review upon this appeal. … (Bleecker v. Johnston, 69 N. Y. 309 ; Wylde v. Northern. R. R. Co. of N. J., 53 id. 156, and see Woodruff v. Hurson, 32 Barb. 564 .) This was attempted in the present case by the examination of Mr. William H.

Ryan v. Brown

51 Misc. 67 · Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · Jun 15, 1906

Buchsbaum v. Feldman, 43 Misc. Rep. 85 ; Lissner v. Cohen, 49 id. 272. The order is reversed, with costs. Present: Gildersleeve, Leventritt and McCall, JJ. Order reversed, with costs.

Brown v. Keefe

255 A.D.2d 971 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 1998

Co. v Jennings, 195 AD2d 541, 542 ). The record establishes that Michael Keefe drove the vehicle only once, on the day of the accident. … That is insufficient to establish that Michael Keefe had “ ‘regular use’ ” of the vehicle (Hollander v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 60 AD2d 380, 384 , lv denied 44 NY2d 646 ).

People v. Brown

47 A.D.2d 930 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 21, 1975

People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 ). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

134 A.D.3d 554 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 17, 2015

Defendant’s unpreserved challenges to the validity of his plea do not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]), and we decline to review them in the interest … Unlike the situation in People v Mox ( 20 NY3d 936 [2012]), there was nothing in the plea allocution that triggered a duty to inquire into an potential psychiatric defense.

People v. Brown

223 A.D.2d 597 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 16, 1996

see, People v Hawkins, 210 AD2d 504 ; People v Vickers, 177 AD2d 608 ). … Ramos, 215 AD2d 785 ; People v Hawkins, supra).

People v. Brown

23 A.D.3d 1090 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 2005

We reject that contention (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). … Similarly, the spontaneous statements thereafter made by defendant also are not subject to suppression (see generally People v Boyd, 21 AD3d 1428 [2005]; People v Elmore, 19 AD3d 1046 [2005]).

People v. Brown

19 N.Y.3d 982 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 2012

Anas v. Brown

269 A.D.2d 761 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 16, 2000

Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting the motion of Murray Brown, *762 Winston Chang, Michael Gort, Nagesh Revankar and Paul Zarembka (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. … Collins, 111 NY 143, 150 ; see, Stukuls v State of New York, 42 NY2d 272, 279 ).

People v. Brown

224 A.D.2d 226 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 1996

, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 12 years to life and V-lz … did] not define the offenses involved in such a way as to make an acquittal of one crime conclusive as to a necessary element of [the] second crime for which a guilty verdict was rendered, there is no repugnancy” (People v

People v. Brown

107 A.D.3d 499 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 2013

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). … This did not meet defendant’s burden of showing that the proposed spectators were “linked to him by some tie of more significance than ordinary friendship” (see People v Nazario, 4 NY3d 70, 74 [2005]), and there was no need

People v. Brown

269 A.D.2d 809 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 16, 2000

v Giordano, 72 AD2d 550, 551 ; People v Niemczycki, 67 AD2d 442, 444-445 ). … That phrase may be stricken under the doctrine of sever-ability (see, People v Hansen, 38 NY2d 17, 21-22 ; People v Conte, supra, at 994 ).

People v. Brown

270 A.D.2d 917 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 29, 2000

Smith, 63 NY2d 41, 68 , cert denied 469 US 1227 , reh denied 471 US 1049 ; People v Martuzas, 224 AD2d 928, 929 , Iv denied 88 NY2d 881 ). … Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 ; People v Gallow, 171 AD2d 1061 , lv denied 77 NY2d 995 ).