Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.94s
City Lighting Products Group v. Rubin Brown, LLP
381 S.W.3d 385 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 2012
Cited 0 timesPublishedC. H. Brown Banking Co. v. Baker
99 Mo. App. 660 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 11, 1903
Brown Banking Company, but at that time no suit had been brought by the Brown Banking Company against Baker upon said indebtedness. Before the draft was paid, an officer, of the C. H. … Riley v. Kershan, 52 Mo. 224 ; Pollman Coal Co. v. St. Louis, 145 Mo. l. c. 656; Winter v. Railway, 160 Mo. 159 ; Goodson v. Acc. Ass’n, 91 Mo. App. 339 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Brown
231 Mo. App. 56 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 25, 1936
[Miller v. Connor, supra.] … [Union Depot Co. v. Frederick, supra; Chicago, M. St. P.R. Co. v. Baker, supra.]
Cited 6 timesPublishedRitchie v. State Board of Agriculture
219 Mo. App. 90 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1924
[Fitch v. Gosser, 54 Mo. App. 267 ; Parker v. Shackleford, 61 Mo. 68, 72 ; Cramer v. Groseclose, 53 Mo. App. 648, 650 ; Bailey v. *98 The Siegel Gas Fixture Co., 54 Mo. App. 50 ; Ridge v. Railroad Transfer Co., 56 Mo. … [Doty v. Railroad, 136 Mo. App. 254, 259 ; Cox v. Railroad, 111 Mo. App. 394, 406 ; McKinzie v. Guthrie, 212 S. W. 563 .]
Cited 9 timesPublished795 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 7, 1992
The Court has carefully reviewed City Board’s proposed plans, budget and implementation schedule. … The Court also has the benefit of Amicus Shu-lamith Simon’s observations conveyed to the Court pursuant to G(283)92, and of the State of Missouri’s response to City Board’s report, G(288)92, and City Board’s reply, G(307)
Cited 2 timesPublishedDegraffenreid v. State Board of Mediation
379 S.W.3d 171 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 1, 2012
See NLRB v. … In NME Hospitals v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState ex rel. Brown v. City of O'Fallon
728 S.W.2d 595 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1987
The O’Fallon, Missouri Board of Aider-men, [Board], voted seven to one to remove Mayor James Brown from his office. … Braddy v. Zych, 702 S.W.2d 491, 493-494 (Mo.App.1985).
Cited 8 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Brown v. III Investments, Inc.
80 S.W.3d 855 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 2002
Brown also served as a member of the board of directors for Five I from 1992 or 1993 through July 5,1998. Mr. Brown was terminated from his position as vice-president of Triple I in January 1998. … Jones v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSowder v. Board of Police Commissioners
553 S.W.2d 525 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1977
McCallister v. Priest, 422 S.W.2d 650, 656 [3] (Mo.banc 1968); Milani v. Miller, 515 S.W.2d 412, 420 (Mo.1974). … State v. Burns, supra, l.c. 741.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDonelson v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
368 S.W.2d 728 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1963
This rule was recognized and applied in Ford v. Boyd, Mo.App., 298 S.W.2d 501 , and Casper v. Lee, 362 Mo. 927 , 245 S.W.2d 132 . The foregoing principles are reflected in the following statement quoted from 101 C.J.S. … These provisions limit the authority of the circuit court to the correction of illegality in orders made by the Board of Adjustment. Veal v. Leimkuehler, Mo.App., 249 S.W.2d 491 ; State ex rel. Nigro v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCurchin v. Missouri Industrial Development Board
722 S.W.2d 930 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 8, 1987
Plaza Prop *931 erties v. … Horstman v. Missouri Industrial Development Board, No. 68762 (Mo. banc Oct. 29,1986) (involving the issuance of bonds to support the St.
Cited 11 timesPublished106 F.R.D. 70 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 14, 1985
In Perrignon v. … United States v. Luther, 481 F.2d 429, 432 (9th Cir.1973); United States v. Wells, 446 F.2d 2, 4 (2d Cir.1971); Mullen v. United States, 263 F.2d 275, 277-80 (D.C.Cir.1958).
Cited 3 timesPublishedMissouri Board of Pharmacy v. Tadrus
926 S.W.2d 132 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 28, 1996
Phil Crowley Steel Corp. v. King, 778 S.W.2d 800 , *136 803 (Mo.App.1989). … Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co., 761 S.W.2d 735, 737 (Mo.App.1988).
Cited 8 timesPublishedPfefer v. Board of Police Commissioners
654 S.W.2d 124 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 3, 1983
Moore v. Damos, 489 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Mo.App.1972). … As Judge Wasserstrom pointed out in State Board of Registration For Healing Arts v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMissouri State Park Board v. McDaniel
513 S.W.2d 447 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 22, 1974
Action by plaintiff, Park Board, to condemn land of defendants. There was a commissioners’ award of $14,000 and thereafter a jury verdict for $20,000. … Louis Housing Authority v. Barnes, 375 S.W.2d 144 (Mo.1964), and State ex rel. City of St. Louis v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBauer v. Board of Election Commissioners
198 S.W.3d 161 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 8, 2006
Bagsby v. Gehres, 169 S.W.3d 543, 547 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). … Wrenn v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 923 S.W.2d 423, 425 (Mo.App.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBoard of Public Utilities v. Fenton
669 S.W.2d 612 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1984
The transformer was the property of the plaintiff Board of Public Utilities. … Cantrell, an electrical engineer employed by the plaintiff Board of Public Utilities.
Cited 11 timesPublishedJenkins v. Missouri Veterinary Medical Board
397 S.W.3d 54 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 2013
In her second point on appeal, Jenkins argues that the trial court erred in affirming the denial of the license because the Veterinary Medical Board’s statutory interpretation and practice of issuing licenses by reciprocity
Cited 1 timesPublishedOde v. Board of Zoning Adjustment
796 S.W.2d 81 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 18, 1990
Franklin v. Board of Directors, 772 S.W.2d 873, 877 (Mo.App.1989). … Wolfner v. Board of Adjustment, 672 S.W.2d 147, 150 (Mo.App.1984); Stockwell v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 434 S.W.2d 785, 789 (Mo.App.1968).
Cited 8 timesPublished179 F. 399 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jun 17, 1910
Price, individually and as' the Price Commission Company, from receiving and Using the continuous quotations of the Chicago Board of Trade in the city of St. Rouis. … Price is directly or indirectly participating in, or is or was connected with, the Price Commission Company, or using the quotations of the Chicago Board of Trade as an individual.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna