Case law

Scott v. Merrill's Estate

74 Or. 568 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1915

An option to buy on condition of making specified payments at specified dates is not an actual purchase nor an executed contract of purchase: Darr v. Mummert, 57 Neb. 378 ( 77 N. W. 767 ); Heimberger v. Rudd, 30 S. … W. 374, 377 ); Dwyer v. Raborn, 6 Wash. 213 ( 33 Pac. 350 ).

Tektronix, Inc. v. Watson

132 Or. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1995

Koitzsch v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 125 Or App 666, 670 , 866 P2d 514 (1994). … ORS 656.268(7). *487 We conclude, however, that the Board erred when it found that Wilson did not ratify findings contained in Brown’s report.

Easton v. SAIF Corp.

264 Or. App. 147 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 2014

ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(7), (8); Hopkins v. Kobos Co., 186 Or App 273 , 62 P3d 870 (2003). In SAIF v. … v.

Graham v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 4, 2021

Governor Brown made public comments critical of Plaintiffs’ reopening. Id. at ¶ 69. … Elkhorn Baptist Church v. Brown, 366 Or. 506, 523-536 (2020).

Wolfe v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 10, 2021

v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Slater v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 10, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 3-4, ECF No. 11; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Sopher v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

197 Or. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2005

By order, we denied the motion to dismiss, citing our decision in Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 170 Or App 653 , 13 P3d 1009 (2000). On our own motion, we reconsider our order denying the motion to dismiss. … For the reasons stated in Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 197 Or App 43 , 103 P3d 1201 (2005), we now grant the board’s motion. Petition for judicial review dismissed.

Moore v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 6, 2021

KATE BROWN, et al., Defendants. … George v.

Cochran v. Board of Psychologist Examiners

171 Or. App. 324 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2000

The Board’s opinion, however, does not identity the standard it employed in reaching that conclusion, nor does it set out the evidence in the record that supports its conclusion. See Cochran v. … An agency, however, may not “ ‘use its special knowledge as a substitute for evidence presented at a hearing.’ ” Drew v. PSRB, 322 Or 491, 498 , 909 P2d 1211 (1996) (quoting and adopting a statement from Rolfe v.

Vollert v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 9, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 3-4, ECF No. 15; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Thomas v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 28, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 3, ECF No. 10; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.

Loera v. State Board of Higher Education

45 Or. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

Under McPherson v. Employment Division, 285 Or 541 , 591 P2d 1381 (1979), the elaboration of a standard such as "cause” is the function of the administrative agency rather than the court. … Mary’s Fine Foods, Inc. v. OLCC, 30 Or App 435 , 567 P2d 146 (1977). We have difficulty in understanding petitioner’s third assignment.

City of LaGrande v. Public Employes Retirement Board

28 Or. App. 9 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 1977

Fire Fighters, 20 Or App 293 , 531 P2d 730 , Sup Ct review denied (1975), we remanded the case to the Public Employe Relations Board (now Employment Relations Board) to examine the city’s labor relations ordinance section-by-section … Accordingly, we overruled that portion of the opinion directing that the case be remanded to the board for a section-by-section reexamination.

Maney v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 13, 2021

(“Governor Brown”), Patrick Allen, several ODOC officials, and the State of Oregon (together, “Defendants”). … See Gessele v. Jack in the Box, Inc., No. 3:10-cv-960-ST, 2013 WL 1326563, at *31 (D. Or. Jan. 28, 2013) (noting that the plaintiffs “bear the burden of demonstrating that each element of [FED. R. CIV.

Oregon School Activities Ass'n v. State Board of Education

244 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 2011

First Commerce of America v. Nimbus Center Assoc., 329 Or 199, 206 , 986 P2d 556 (1999), rev’d on other grounds by Kerr v. Bradbury, 340 Or 241 , 131 P3d 737 (2006). … Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402, 405 , 848 P2d 1194 (1993); Kay v. David Douglas Sch. Dist.

Johnson v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 18, 2021

See ECF 1 at 72-76 (Board of Nursing rulemaking documents). … Johnson v.

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

183 Or. App. 376 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 14, 2002

Lovelace v. Board of Parole (A109609), 183 Or App 283 , 51 P3d 1269 (2002).

Hammond v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

121 Or. App. 343 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1993

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) issued on January 30, 1992. … See Scott v. OSP, 117 Or App 182 , 843 P2d 512 (1992); ORAP 4.35.

Maney v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 28, 2021

Brown v. Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 09-cv-03339-EJD (SVK), 2018 WL 339080, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2018); see also A.B. v. Pac. Fertility Ctr., No. 06-cv-2671-BTM (WMc), No. 18-cv-01586-JSC, 2019 WL 6605883, at *1 (N.D. … Brown, 2018 WL 339080, at *1 (citation omitted); see also Moreno v. Autozone, Inc., No. C-05-4432 MJJ (EMC), 2007 WL 2288165, at *1 (N.D. Cal.

Bobo v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 6, 2021

Mot. to Stay at 2, ECF No. 18; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936), and Lockyer v.