Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.46s
Board of Commissioners v. Malone
179 N.C. 110 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1919
of education, Gill v. … C., 176 ; Key v. Board of Education, 170 N. C., 123 , but, on the facts of this record, the reference in the petition to equipment as one of the purposes does not come within the principle of these cases.
Cited 7 timesPublishedBarbee v. Board of Commissioners
210 N.C. 717 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 25, 1936
E., 749 ; McDowell v. Const. Co., 96 N. C., 514 , 2 S. E., 351 ; Smith v. Wilmington, 98 N. C., 343 , 4 S. E., 489 ; Wood v. Oxford, 97 N. C., 227 , 2 S. E., 653 ; Smallwood v. New Bern, 90 N. C., 36 ; Perry v. … Bank v. Gahagan, ante, 464; Sutton v. Ins. Co., 209 N. C., 826 , 184 S. E., 821 ; Oliver v. Hood, Comr., ibid, 291, 183 S. E., 657 ; Distributing Corp. v. Maxwell, ibid., 47, 182 S. E., 724 ; Phifer v. Berry, 202 N.
Cited 10 timesPublished367 N.C. 255 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 7, 2013
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Murphy
107 N.C. 36 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1890
Gatling v. Commissioners, 92 N. C., 536 ; Wade v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., 81 ; Huggins v. Hinson, Phil., 126.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · Sep 29, 2023
Anderson—a judicial proceeding.4 Defendant’s subpoena objections specifically questioned Plaintiff’s intentions for both filing the Brown v. … Furthermore, the statements are sufficiently relevant to the Brown v. Anderson proceeding. Plaintiff’s Sprint Subpoena sought a wide variety of records from 4 Plaintiff incorrectly cites Topping v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoard of Education v. . Deitrick
221 N.C. 38 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 25, 1942
Hoover v. Indemnity Co., 202 N. C., 655 , 163 S. E., 758 ; Brown v. R. R. Co., 202 N. C., 256 , 162 S. E., 613 ; Bost v. Metcalfe, 219 N. C., 607 , 14 S. E., (2d), 648. Affirmed.
Cited 11 timesPublishedGriffith v. . Board of Education
183 N.C. 408 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 26, 1922
Kilpatrick v. Harvey, 170 N. C., 668 ; Moore v. Monument Co., 166 N. C., 212 ; Harrison v. Bryan, 148 N. C., 315 . … Hicks v. Comrs., ante, 394; Paschal v. Johnson, ibid., 129; Perry v. Comrs., ibid., 387. Appeal dismissed.
Cited 6 timesPublishedJulian Baptist Church, Inc. v. Brown
310 N.C. 745 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1984
Petition by Church and Brown for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 Denied 30 April 1984.
Cited 0 timesPublished304 N.C. 192 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 6, 1981
Cited 0 timesPublished74 N.C. App. 599 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1985
Cited 2 timesPublishedRuffin v. Board of Commissioners
69 N.C. 498 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1873
It seems to be settled by numerous cases in the United States Supreme Court, cited in plaintiff’s brief beginning with McCullock v. … It seems that all that is to be inferred from the decision in Veazie Bank v. Fenno, supra, is not that National Bank bills are exempt, but that Congress has the power to exempt them from State taxation. See Lilly v.
Cited 6 timesPublished13 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1829
Whatever title William Brown had to the land in dispute has been transferred to the lessors of the Plaintiff, and on that title he rests his right to recover in the present action. … If William Brown, had conveyed the legal title in the land To the Defendant in 1821, and they had both remained in possession so langas to make an uninterrupted possession of seven years from the time William Brown first
Cited 0 timesPublishedGregory v. WA BROWN & PMA INS.
667 S.E.2d 468 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 2008
667 S.E.2d 468 (2008) GREGORY v. W.A. BROWN & PMA Ins. No. 447A08. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 24, 2008. William D. Acton, Jr., Charlotte, for Gregory. Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 664 S.E.2d 589 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedMessrs. Brown, Campbell & Co. v. Clary
2 N.C. 125 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 15, 1794
. — Vide Davis’s ex’rs. v. Wilkinson and others, post 334, see the act of 1797, Dev. ch 475, as to how the judgment in such case is to be entered.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTidewater Bank & Trust Co. v. Brown
190 N.C. 847 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925
Cited 0 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 18, 2005
See Ruffin v. Compass Group USA , 150 N.C. App. 480 , 563 S.E.2d 633 (2002); and Smith v. Champion, Int'l. , 134 N.C. App. 180 , 517 S.E.2d 164 (1999). 3. … See Chilton v. Bowman Gray School of Medicine , 45 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTidewater Bank & Trust Co. v. Brown
190 N.C. 848 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1925
Cited 0 timesPublishedGovernor Ex Rel. Brown v. Franklin
7 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 5, 1819
Wilcocks v. Huggins, 2 Strange 907.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Blackburn
68 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1873
By the Constitution these Courts were abolished; their judicial powers were given to the Superior Courts, and the administration of the municipal affairs of the counties to the boards of county commissioners. … Foster v. Woodfin, 65 N. C., 29 . Stanly v. Massengill, 63 N. C. 558 . Mason v. Miles, Id. 564 . It must be implied that no other body has that right.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBlair v. Board of Commissioners
187 N.C. 488 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1924
S. v. Johnson, 170 N. C., p. 690; Felmet v. Comrs., 186 N. C., 251 , and cases there cited. … Walker, J., in S. v. Johnson, supra.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna