Opinion

Griffith v. . Board of Education

  • 183 N.C. 408
  • 112 S.E. 10
  • 1922 N.C. LEXIS 282
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Apr 26, 1922
Status
Published
Author
Stacy
On the bench
Stacy
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 80.6%

The opinion

Stacy, J.

It appears that the purpose for which this action was instituted, to wit, to prevent the holding of the election in question, has been accomplished. At any rate, the election was not held, and there is nothing now to enjoin.

McKinney v. Comrs.

(Fla.), 3 So. Rep., 887 . The time for holding the election has long since passed, and it cannot presently be held, under the previous action of the defendants. Nothing further can be done in .the way of levying the proposed tax unless ■another election is called. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed.

Kilpatrick v. Harvey,

170 N. C., 668 ;

Moore v. Monument Co.,

166 N. C., 212 ;

Harrison v. Bryan,

148 N. C., 315 .

Courts of equity are slow to enjoin the holding of elections and ordinarily they will not do so unless it is clear that they are being illegally Feld.

Hood v. Sutton,

175 N. C., 101 . The wisdom for this cautious •exercise of such power is obvious.

Connor v. Gray,

9 Anno. Cases, 121, and note. But it is generally held that an injunction will issue to ■restrain the holding of an election where there is no authority for calling it, and where the holding of such an election would result in a waste of public funds.

Solomon v. Fleming,

34 Neb., 40 ; 9 R. C. L., 1001.

The record is silent as to whether the defendants expect to pursue the Instant matter further; but, we apprehend that such is their purpose, or ■else this appeal would not have been presented for our consideration. "We have experienced some difficulty in trying to harmonize the provisions of Public Laws 1921, ch. 179, with all the sections of C. S., art. 18, ■ch. 95, and at the same time square them with the requirements of the

*410

Constitution; but, from tbe facts now appearing, we cannot say, in advance, that tbe defendants are proposing to proceed in an unlawful1 manner. Tbe contrary will be presumed.

Thrash v. Comrs.,

150 N. C., 693 . It may not be amiss, however, to call attention to some of the-recent decisions bearing more or less directly upon tbe subject now in band, though it is-conceded that these cases are not decisive of tbe exact, question which the parties to this proceeding have sought to raise..

Hicks v. Comrs., ante,

394;

Paschal v. Johnson, ibid.,

129;

Perry v. Comrs., ibid.,

387.

Appeal dismissed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.