Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.74s
District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 8, 2025
Florida Department of Probation, filed August 19, 2024 (separate § 2254 habeas petition challenging guilty plea of 1 I note that there may also be qualified or absolute immunity defenses for the various Defendants Plaintiff … Baldwin County, 835 F.3d 1338, 1343-44 (11th Cir. 2016) (“qualified immunity protects government officials performing discretionary functions from liability if their conduct violates no clearly established statutory or
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Colorado · Sep 16, 2021
Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … Accordingly, plaintiff has not carried his burden, in the face of the assertion of qualified immunity, to show that this right was clearly established in 5 Plaintiff argues for the first time in his response to the objection
Cited 0 timesUnknownMichael Bourne v. Michael Gunnels
921 F.3d 484 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 16, 2019
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and its progeny, or, alter- natively, (3) defendants are entitled to qualified immunity (“QI”) from his claims because he did not establish a constitutional violation. … “A qualified immunity defense alters the usual summary judgment bur- den of proof.” Brown v. Callahan, 623 F.3d 249, 253 (5th Cir. 2010).
Cited 83 timesPublishedDerrick Sanderlin v. Jason Dwyer
116 F.4th 905 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 4, 2024
immunity because he did not violate clearly established law. … We now turn to the second prong of qualified immunity—whether the right violated was “clearly established.” We ask whether the law was “clearly established at the time an action occurred.”
Cited 18 timesPublishedK. Blackwell v. City of Pittsburgh
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2025
“Clearly established means that, at the time of 7 Thomas resolved the tension between federal notice pleading and qualified immunity’s “fact-specific inquiry.” … clearly established.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished518 F.3d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 4, 2008
United States, 873 F.2d 1210, 1213 (9th Cir.1989), though logic alone, even without experience, may be enough to establish the right. See Seattle Times Co. v. U.S. Dist. … The court didn't clearly err in so finding and, in light of that finding, its decision to unseal these portions of the documents was not an abuse of discretion.
Cited 47 timesPublishedUnited States v. Ledford (Geneva Saylor)
991 F.2d 797 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1993
Cited 50 timesPublishedNelson Edwards v. Michael Jolliff-Blake
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 1, 2018
that constitutional right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.” … immunity); Junkert, 610 F.3d at 370 (concluding officers were entitled to qualified immunity based on their reasonable belief that the affidavit established probable cause even though it left “much to be de‐ sired”)
Cited 0 timesPublished564 F. Supp. 2d 194 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 9, 2008
Nevertheless, I find that even if probable cause was lacking or questionable, defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity shields public officials from an action for civil damages, to the extent that their challenged acts do not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would
Cited 8 timesPublishedGreg Myers, Etc. v. R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Etc.
810 F.2d 1437 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 9, 1987
of clearly established legal norms. … If they do, however, defendants Johnson, Ma-nahan and Walling are shielded by qualified immunity from further litigation of these claims in the absence of any identified legal duty to behave otherwise or any clearly established
Abrogated on other grounds by Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478 (1991)Cited 491 timesPublishedDeshawn Gervin v. Pamela Florence
139 F.4th 1236 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 9, 2025
Second, we leave the dis- cussion of qualified immunity for later. … I also agree that the Pro- bation Officer Defendants cannot claim qualified immunity.
Cited 36 timesPublished503 F. App'x 672 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 12, 2012
When a defendant raises the defense of qualified immunity in a motion to dismiss, this court “review[s] the denial of [the] motion . . . de novo and determine[s] whether the complaint alleges a clearly established constitutional … For the same reasons Officer Black is entitled to qualified immunity for Appellees’ Fourth Amendment claims, he is also entitled to qualified immunity for the Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claims.
Cited 10 timesUnpublishedBledsoe v. Board Cty Comm. Jefferson KS
53 F.4th 589 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Nov 15, 2022
was clearly established. … The majority cites Shaw, without further elaboration, to hold that Appellants “are entitled to qualified immunity on Bledsoe’s failure-to-intervene claim because such a claim was not clearly established in 1999.”
Cited 135 timesPublishedFlorentina Demuth v. County of Los Angeles
798 F.3d 837 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 2015
We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its grant of qualified immunity de novo. … This doctrine protects government officials from suits for damages unless their actions violated “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMorgan-Tyra v. City of St. Louis
District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 22, 2022
An officer is entitled to qualified immunity unless the evidence establishes (1) a violation of a constitutional or statutory right, and (2) the right was clearly established at the time of the violation such that a reasonable … State Univ., 495 F.3d 591, 594 (8th Cir. 2007) (“Although the defendant bears the burden of proof for [qualified immunity], the plaintiff must demonstrate that the law was clearly established.”); Johnson-El v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 9, 2019
Qualified Immunity Defendants object to Judge Sison’s conclusion that they are not entitled to qualified immunity on Blackman’s due process claim with regard to his … Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 (2009) (to determine whether a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, a court must consider whether there is a violation of a constitutional right and whether that right was clearly established
Cited 0 timesUnknown124 F.3d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 11, 1997
Qualified Immunity 15 The defense of qualified immunity shields government agents "from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … A defendant pleading qualified immunity on a motion to dismiss is entitled to prevail if the allegations in the complaint fail to "state a claim of violation of clearly established law." Behrens v.
Cited 71 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · Mar 4, 2026
Qualified Immunity. … See id. at 368 (“[A]s Defendants have not presented any penological interest . . . and [the plaintiff’s] right was clearly established, we hold that Defendants have not shown that they are entitled to qualified immunity
Cited 0 timesUnknown937 F.3d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Sep 11, 2019
was “clearly established.” … In evaluating an officer’s claim to qualified immunity, “[t]he dispositive question is whether the violative nature of particular conduct is clearly established.” Mullenix v. Luna, 136 S.
Cited 175 timesPublished322 F.3d 1290 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 28, 2003
The qualified immunity defense may be raised and addressed on a motion to dismiss, and will be granted if the complaint "fails to allege the violation of a clearly established constitutional right." Chesser v. … B. 12 Qualified immunity protects government officials sued in their individual capacities as long as their conduct does not violate "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would
Cited 26 timesPublished
Ask Donna