Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1878

10,000+ results

4.74s

  • Gioia v. Bradshaw

    District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 8, 2025

    Florida Department of Probation, filed August 19, 2024 (separate § 2254 habeas petition challenging guilty plea of 1 I note that there may also be qualified or absolute immunity defenses for the various Defendants Plaintiff … Baldwin County, 835 F.3d 1338, 1343-44 (11th Cir. 2016) (“qualified immunity protects government officials performing discretionary functions from liability if their conduct violates no clearly established statutory or

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vreeland v. Olson

    District Court, D. Colorado · Sep 16, 2021

    Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … Accordingly, plaintiff has not carried his burden, in the face of the assertion of qualified immunity, to show that this right was clearly established in 5 Plaintiff argues for the first time in his response to the objection

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Michael Bourne v. Michael Gunnels

    921 F.3d 484 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 16, 2019

    Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and its progeny, or, alter- natively, (3) defendants are entitled to qualified immunity (“QI”) from his claims because he did not establish a constitutional violation. … “A qualified immunity defense alters the usual summary judgment bur- den of proof.” Brown v. Callahan, 623 F.3d 249, 253 (5th Cir. 2010).

    Cited 83 timesPublished
  • Derrick Sanderlin v. Jason Dwyer

    116 F.4th 905 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 4, 2024

    immunity because he did not violate clearly established law. … We now turn to the second prong of qualified immunity—whether the right violated was “clearly established.” We ask whether the law was “clearly established at the time an action occurred.”

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • K. Blackwell v. City of Pittsburgh

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2025

    “Clearly established means that, at the time of 7 Thomas resolved the tension between federal notice pleading and qualified immunity’s “fact-specific inquiry.” … clearly established.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • In Re Copley Press, Inc.

    518 F.3d 1022 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 4, 2008

    United States, 873 F.2d 1210, 1213 (9th Cir.1989), though logic alone, even without experience, may be enough to establish the right. See Seattle Times Co. v. U.S. Dist. … The court didn't clearly err in so finding and, in light of that finding, its decision to unseal these portions of the documents was not an abuse of discretion.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • United States v. Ledford (Geneva Saylor)

    991 F.2d 797 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 6, 1993

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Nelson Edwards v. Michael Jolliff-Blake

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 1, 2018

      that  constitutional  right  was  clearly  established  at  the  time  of  the  alleged  violation.”  …   immunity);  Junkert,  610 F.3d at 370 (concluding officers were entitled to qualified  immunity based on  their reasonable  belief that  the  affidavit  established probable cause even though it left “much to be de‐ sired”)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Daniels v. D'AURIZO

    564 F. Supp. 2d 194 · District Court, W.D. New York · Jul 9, 2008

    Nevertheless, I find that even if probable cause was lacking or questionable, defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity shields public officials from an action for civil damages, to the extent that their challenged acts do not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Greg Myers, Etc. v. R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Etc.

    810 F.2d 1437 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 9, 1987

    of clearly established legal norms. … If they do, however, defendants Johnson, Ma-nahan and Walling are shielded by qualified immunity from further litigation of these claims in the absence of any identified legal duty to behave otherwise or any clearly established

    Abrogated on other grounds by Burns v. Reed, 500 U.S. 478 (1991)Cited 491 timesPublished
  • Deshawn Gervin v. Pamela Florence

    139 F.4th 1236 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 9, 2025

    Second, we leave the dis- cussion of qualified immunity for later. … I also agree that the Pro- bation Officer Defendants cannot claim qualified immunity.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Joann Cooper v. Ryan Black

    503 F. App'x 672 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 12, 2012

    When a defendant raises the defense of qualified immunity in a motion to dismiss, this court “review[s] the denial of [the] motion . . . de novo and determine[s] whether the complaint alleges a clearly established constitutional … For the same reasons Officer Black is entitled to qualified immunity for Appellees’ Fourth Amendment claims, he is also entitled to qualified immunity for the Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claims.

    Cited 10 timesUnpublished
  • Bledsoe v. Board Cty Comm. Jefferson KS

    53 F.4th 589 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Nov 15, 2022

    was clearly established. … The majority cites Shaw, without further elaboration, to hold that Appellants “are entitled to qualified immunity on Bledsoe’s failure-to-intervene claim because such a claim was not clearly established in 1999.”

    Cited 135 timesPublished
  • Florentina Demuth v. County of Los Angeles

    798 F.3d 837 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 14, 2015

    We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its grant of qualified immunity de novo. … This doctrine protects government officials from suits for damages unless their actions violated “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Morgan-Tyra v. City of St. Louis

    District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 22, 2022

    An officer is entitled to qualified immunity unless the evidence establishes (1) a violation of a constitutional or statutory right, and (2) the right was clearly established at the time of the violation such that a reasonable … State Univ., 495 F.3d 591, 594 (8th Cir. 2007) (“Although the defendant bears the burden of proof for [qualified immunity], the plaintiff must demonstrate that the law was clearly established.”); Johnson-El v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Blackman v. Butler

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 9, 2019

    Qualified Immunity Defendants object to Judge Sison’s conclusion that they are not entitled to qualified immunity on Blackman’s due process claim with regard to his … Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 232 (2009) (to determine whether a defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, a court must consider whether there is a violation of a constitutional right and whether that right was clearly established

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mcevoy v. Spencer

    124 F.3d 92 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 11, 1997

    Qualified Immunity 15 The defense of qualified immunity shields government agents "from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … A defendant pleading qualified immunity on a motion to dismiss is entitled to prevail if the allegations in the complaint fail to "state a claim of violation of clearly established law." Behrens v.

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Lazarus

    District Court, W.D. Virginia · Mar 4, 2026

    Qualified Immunity. … See id. at 368 (“[A]s Defendants have not presented any penological interest . . . and [the plaintiff’s] right was clearly established, we hold that Defendants have not shown that they are entitled to qualified immunity

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Charles Hamner v. Danny Burls

    937 F.3d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Sep 11, 2019

    was “clearly established.” … In evaluating an officer’s claim to qualified immunity, “[t]he dispositive question is whether the violative nature of particular conduct is clearly established.” Mullenix v. Luna, 136 S.

    Cited 175 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Siegelman

    322 F.3d 1290 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 28, 2003

    The qualified immunity defense may be raised and addressed on a motion to dismiss, and will be granted if the complaint "fails to allege the violation of a clearly established constitutional right." Chesser v. … B. 12 Qualified immunity protects government officials sued in their individual capacities as long as their conduct does not violate "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would

    Cited 26 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.