Case law

Brown v. State

2 Misc. 2d 307 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1945

Brown, was operating a truck belonging to claimant, Burt I. … (Karl v. State of New York, 279 N. Y. 555 ; Torrey v. State of New York, 266 App. Div. 900 .)

People v. Brown

39 A.D.3d 1021 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 19, 2007

Initially, given that defendant is on parole, we do not agree with the People’s contention that defendant’s appeal is moot due to his October 12, 2006 release from prison (see People v Hastings, 24 AD3d 954 , 956 n [2005] … In sum, there are no extraordinary circumstances that exist which warrant a reduction of the sentence (see People v Murphy, 257 AD2d 766, 767 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 876 [1999]).

People v. Brown

51 A.D.3d 685 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 6, 2008

doubt (see People v Nieves, 37 AD3d 277 [2007]; People v Trotter, 24 AD3d 127 [2005]; cf. … People v Quinn, 186 AD2d 691, 692 [1992]).

Brown v. Speaker

33 A.D.3d 446 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 17, 2006

To the contrary, he was extensively involved in the decision that plaintiff was a suitable candidate for the LASIK surgery and in the preparation leading to that surgery (see Graddy v New York Med. … Ctr., 254 AD2d 129,130 [1998]) or under the theory of ostensible agency (see Welch v Scheinfeld, 21 AD3d 802, 808-809 [2005]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

People v. Brown

66 A.D.2d 158 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1979

legal assistance by the conduct of the District Attorney in concealing Brown’s whereabouts from Stirpe (see People v Bevilacqua, 45 NY2d 508 ; People v Pinzon, 44 NY2d 458 ; People v Townsend, 33 *161 NY2d 37 ). … People v Hobson, 39 NY2d 479 ; People v Hetherington, 27 NY2d 242 ).

People v. Brown

105 A.D.3d 517 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 2013

People v. Brown

32 A.D.3d 1222 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 22, 2006

Although the revocation of probation results in a loss of liberty, it is not a criminal prosecution (see generally Gagnon v Scarpelli, 411 US 778, 782 [1973]; Matter of Darvin M. v Jacobs, 69 NY2d 957, 959 [1987]). … In any event, any error in admitting the firearms report is harmless (see generally People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237 [1975]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Brown v. Kennedy

14 Misc. 2d 405 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1956

Brown v. Sachs

57 A.D.2d 583 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 14, 1977

In a proceeding inter alia, to validate petitions designating petitioner-respondent as a candidate in the election to be held on May 3, 1977, for the public position of Member of the ■ New York City Community School Board … Therefore we hold that the mistake was inconsequential and should not cause petitioner to lose her place upon the ballot (see Matter of Rothstein v Chiavaroli, 41 AD2d 1024 ). Hopkins, Acting P.

People v. Brown

306 A.D.2d 291 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 2, 2003

The stop was based upon information from a police computer run that the defendant was driving a vehicle with a suspended registration (see generally, People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413 [1975]; People v Osamudiamen, 269 AD2d 609 … [2000]; People v McCoy, 239 AD2d 437 [1997]).

People v. Brown

161 A.D.2d 527 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 29, 1990

(See, People v McLucas, 15 NY2d 167, 170 .) Nor, in the circumstances, did the second statement explain or complete the first. … (See, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 799 ; CPL 440.30 [2].)

People v. Brown

107 A.D.3d 1502 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 2013

People v. Brown

107 A.D.3d 1502 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 2013

People v. Brown

139 A.D.3d 963 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 18, 2016

Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 428-429 [2004]; People v Harrison, 288 AD2d 396 [2001]; People v Respass, 213 AD2d 430, 430 [1995]). … The People were thus entitled to question the defendant on cross-examination regarding his inappropriate conduct toward the complainant’s cousin (see People v Fardan, 82 NY2d 638, 646 [1993]; People v Perez, 120 AD3d 514

Brown v. Browne

187 A.D.2d 580 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1992

Kenneth Browne under Queens County Indictment Number QN10243/92. … Prohibition is never available merely to correct or prevent trial errors of substantive law or procedure, however grievous (Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 353 ; La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d 575, 579 ).

People v. Brown

62 A.D.3d 1209 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 2009

Page, 266 AD2d 733, 735 [1999]; People v Griffith, 239 AD2d 705, 706-707 [1997]; see also People v Rocco, 309 AD2d 882, 882-883 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 601 [2004]). … Myatt, 248 AD2d 68, 71 [1998]; see also People v Whindleton, 54 AD3d 422, 423 [2008]).

Greene v. Brown

281 N.Y. 742 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1939

People v. Brown

105 A.D.3d 517 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 2013

People v. Brown

123 A.D.2d 473 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 1986

In People v Motley ( 119 AD2d 57 ), we held that the first of the foregoing objections was waived or forfeited by a guilty plea. … The record conclusively establishes that defendant was actually present at his plea colloquy, and not another Harold Brown who was incarcerated at Elmira Correctional Facility and who had been mistakenly produced at earlier

Conkling v. Brown

8 Abb. Pr. 345 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1870

Neither acquired any new estate (Wood v. Fleet, 36 N. Y., 499 ). Upon the death, therefore, of Augustus M. Winter, intestate, unmarried, without descendants, leaving no father, the fee descended to his mother, Mrs. … Stat., Edmonds’ ed., 702; Morris v. Ward, 36 N. Y., 587 ). There must be judgment for the plaintiff on the submission. Ingraham and George G. Barnard, JJ., concurred.