Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.21s
Mallon v. Board of Water Commissioners
144 Mo. App. 104 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1910
[Shaw Stocking Co. v. City of Lowell, 199 Mass. 118 ; State ex rel. v. Gosnell, 116 Wis. 606 ; Cooper v. City of Goodland (Cal.), 102 Pac. 244 ; Powell v. Duluth, 91 Minn. 53 ; Gordon v. … It appears clear that uniformity is a reasonable requirement and that the board has a right to prescribe that a certain kind of méter be installed at the expense of the consumer. [State ex rel. v. Goodfellow, 1 Mo.
Cited 17 timesPublishedMcKenzie v. Midwest Joint Board
998 S.W.2d 184 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublishedTownship Board of Education v. Boyd
58 Mo. 276 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1874
This judgment being paid and satisfied by Justice Boyd, the County Court subsequently, by ordér on the county treasurer, re-imbursed him out of the funds pertaining to the school tówhship: The relators, constituting thé board
Cited 9 timesPublished887 S.W.2d 818 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1994
Cited 0 timesPublished877 S.W.2d 153 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 24, 1994
Louis, styled Yount v. Board of Education for the City of St. Louis, (Yount I), 712 S.W.2d 455 (Mo.App.1986). … Later, in Wilkes v.
Cited 1 timesPublished875 S.W.2d 909 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1994
The Board of Governors of Northeast Missouri State University (Northeast) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Selma J. Casady in an action brought by Ms. … Brown v. Melahn, 824 S.W.2d 930, 933 (Mo.App.1992). Assuming that the legislature intended a logical result, courts must give effect to statutes as they are written. Id.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLinton v. Missouri Veterinary Medical Board
988 S.W.2d 513 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1999
V, sec. 3. The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the decision of the Board is affirmed. I. Linton graduated from the University of Missouri School of Veterinary Medicine in May of 1996. … Consolidated School Dist. v. Jackson Co., 936 S.W.2d 102 (Mo. banc 1996).
Cited 25 timesPublishedBrown v. Southern Equipment Co.
989 F. Supp. 1018 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 19, 1997
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. … In Almonte v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.
20 Mo. App. 222 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1886
As said by Wardlaw, J., in Harrison v. Berkley (1 Strobh. … In Schmidt v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Harshman v. Brown
41 F. 481 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Feb 28, 1890
In the case of Logan v. … Bank v. Winslow, 30 Fed. Rep. 488, and cases cited. 2. With respect to the other point urged, namely, that relator does not show any lawful claim to the fund, it is sufficient to say that the decision in U. S. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.
185 S.W.3d 808 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 2006
Claimant Norma Brown appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) dismissing her application for review as untimely. We dismiss her appeal. … Brown v. MOCAP, Inc., 105 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). In addition, this Court has no jurisdiction, because our jurisdiction is derived from that of the Commission. Id. Our only recourse is to dismiss the appeal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBurgdorf v. Board of Police Commissioners
936 S.W.2d 227 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1996
Regional Lodge No. 50 v. Board of Police *233 Comm’rs, 916 S.W.2d 889, 892 (Mo.App.1996). … Nenninger v.
Overruled on other grounds by Bird v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Professional Land Surveyors & Landscape Architects, 259 S.W.3d 516 (2008)Cited 18 timesPublishedBurnett v. KANSAS CITY SCHOOL BOARD
237 S.W.3d 237 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2007
Wolfram v. Wiesman, 225 S.W.3d 409, 411 (Mo. banc 2007). … In England v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedMercantile Trust Co. National Ass'n v. Brown
468 S.W.2d 8 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 12, 1971
“In Lyon v. … Levering v. Orrick, 97 Md. 139 , 54 A. 620 ; Security Trust Co. v. Lovett, 78 N.J.Eq. 445, 79 A. 616 ; Soper v. Brown, 136 N.Y. 244 , 32 N.E. 768 ; In re Bauerdorf, 77 Mise. 656, 138 N.Y.S. 673 ; Gest v.
Cited 2 timesPublished86 Mo. App. 362 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1900
action of the board of public schools.” … action of the board of public schools.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedKretschmar v. Board of Commissioners
29 Mo. 124 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1859
Cited 0 timesPublishedSnelling v. Board of Education
920 S.W.2d 611 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1996
In this case, Lonnie Snelling filed suit against the Board of Education for inverse condemnation. … The third order, entered on July 26, 1995, sustained the Board’s motion for sanctions against Snelling due to his failure to appear at his own properly noticed deposition and ordered Snelling to pay the Board $43.10 for the
Cited 1 timesPublished469 F. Supp. 1304 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 12, 1979
Brown I was followed by Brown v. … However, notwithstanding the actions taken by the Board subsequent to Brown v.
Reversed on other grounds by Adams v. United States, 620 F.2d 1277 (1980)Cited 9 timesPublishedKoch v. BOARD OF REGENTS, ETC.
256 S.W.2d 785 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 13, 1953
256 S.W.2d 785 (1953) KOCH et al. v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE COLLEGE et al. No. 43137. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. April 13, 1953. *786 Gene Thompson, J. … It would have only restrained the Board from paying out any of those funds to Thomas. It would not have deprived the Board of any prospective funds. Contrast Aquamsi Land Co. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBrown v. STCH, LLC RIVERS EDGE RETIREMENT
211 S.W.3d 641 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2007
Gregory Brown (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) dismissing his application for review of the denial of unemployment benefits. The appeal is dismissed. … Butler v. M.W.S. Enterprises, Inc., 199 S.W.3d 912, 913 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). Here, the Appeals Tribunal mailed its decision to Claimant on July 14, 2006.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna