Case law

Angle v. Missouri Dental Board

911 S.W.2d 325 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 1995

Angle, D.D.S., appeals a decision of the circuit court affirming a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission that cause existed for the Missouri Dental Board to discipline the license of Dr. Angle.

Moffatt v. Board of Trade

203 Mo. 277 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 2, 1907

[Scheurich v. Light Company, 183 Mo. 496 .] We, therefore^ think the record should be transferred to the Kansas City Court of Appeals. It is so ordered. All concur.

Brown v. MISSOURI DELTA MEDICAL CENTER

334 S.W.3d 465 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2010

Appellant Brown sued Respondent Medical Center in 2006, alleging medical negligence in the death of his son. He voluntarily dismissed his case on July 19, 2007. See Brown v. MO Delta Med. … Wilson v. Jackson, 823 S.W.2d 512, 513 (Mo.App.1992). The alternate basis for dismissal, however, was correct. Any wrongful death action accrued in 2003 when Brown’s son died. Sennett v.

Jacobs Manufacturing Co. v. Sam Brown Co.

792 F. Supp. 1520 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 8, 1992

Co. v. Missouri State Highway Commission, 454 S.W.2d 44, 56 (Mo. banc 1970); Scullin Steel Co. v. PACCAR, Inc., 708 S.W.2d 756, 761 (Mo.App.1986). Jacobs argues that Brown’s future profit claim was based on Dr. … Thus, Jacobs is correct that by suing for damages for fraud, Brown has affirmed the contract. Brown’s argument to the contrary misconstrues the authority it cites. Brown relies primarily upon Western Fireproofing Co. v.

State of Missouri v. Daniel Dumond Brown, Sr.

444 S.W.3d 484 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 2014

State v. Simmons, 364 S.W.3d 741, 749 (Mo. App. S.D. 2012) (citing Thummel v. King, 570 S.W.2d 679, 686 (Mo. banc 1978)). The trial court expressly informed Brown that he had a right to self-representation. … State v.

Sealey v. Board of Education

14 S.W.3d 597 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1999

Mitchell v. Board of Educ. of Normandy School Dist., 913 S.W.2d 130, 133 (Mo.App.1996). … As explained in Fuller v.

State ex rel. Enterprise Milling Co. v. Brown

208 Mo. 613 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 24, 1907

[State to use v. Pratte, 8 Mo. 286 ; Martin v. Knapp, 45 Mo. 48 ; Nelson v. Barnett, 123 Mo. 564 .] In Henoch v. … Hurd v.

Liese v. Local Board 102

314 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 15, 1970

It is the opinion of the Court that it is prohibited from reviewing this action of the Board by 50 U.S.C. App. § 460(b) (3). Although Oestereich v. … Selective Service System Local Board No. 11, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968), dealing with exemptions and Breen v.

Missouri State Park Board v. McDaniel

473 S.W.2d 774 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1971

Keyte v. Parrish, Mo.App., 399 S.W.2d 601, 605 (7); Aulgur v. … State Highway Commission v.

City of Marshfield Ex Rel. Hasten v. Brown

337 Mo. 1136 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1935

7056, Revised Statutes 1929, provides that before a city of the fourth class shall make a contract for paving, an estimate of the cost thereof shall be made by the city engineer or other proper officer and submitted to the board … [Barber Asphalt Paving Company v. Hezel, 138 Mo. 228 , 39 S. W. 781 ; Smith v. City of Westport, 174 Mo. 394 , 74 S. W. 610 ; Platt v. Parker-Washington Company, 235 Mo. 467 , 139 S. W. 124 ; Nettleton Bank v.

Wack v. Board of Education

25 S.W.3d 689 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 29, 2000

Louis (“Board”) based on its determination, after a hearing, that Teacher violated Board policies regarding corporal punishment, assault and unprofessional conduct. The trial court affirmed the decision of the Board. … We affirm the decision of the Board pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

McMorrow v. Board of Adjustment

765 S.W.2d 700 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1989

In Matthew v. … Ogawa v. City of Des Peres, supra, [13]; Conner v. Herd, 452 S.W.2d 272 (Mo.App.1970) [14]; Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845 (Mo. App.1964) [9].

State Board of Nursing v. Berry

32 S.W.3d 638 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 28, 2000

State v. Yahne, 943 S.W.2d 741, 745 (Mo.App. W.D.1997) (citing State v. Purlee, 839 S.W.2d 584, 587 (Mo. banc 1992)). … See State v. McCoy, 116 N.M. 491 , 864 P.2d 307, 312 (N.M.App.1993), rev’d on other grounds by State v.

Brown v. Cape Girardeau Macadamized & Plank Road Co.

89 Mo. 152 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1886

Theodosia Brown, while driving in a buggy on defendant’s road, and alleged to have been occasioned by the neglect of defendant to construct its road as required *154 by its charter, and in negligently leaving on its road, … Centenary Church, 62 Mo. 326 ; Engle v. Jones, 51 Mo. 316 ; Doss v.

Gunapt Development, L.L.C. v. Peine Lakes, L.P.

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 29, 2022

App. 2010) (defining constructive trust “as the device used by chancery to compel one who unfairly holds a property interest to convey that interest to another to whom it justly belongs” (quoting Brown v. … Brown, 152 S.W.3d 911, 916 (Mo. App. Ct. 2005))).

McKenzie v. Midwest Joint Board

998 S.W.2d 184 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 17, 1999

Sandweiss v. Board of Adjustment

811 S.W.2d 48 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1991

State Tax Comm’n. v. Luten, 459 S.W.2d 375, 378 (Mo.banc 1970); Rule 100.01. Section 89.110 provides that a writ of certiorari be directed to the board of adjustment. … A function of the writ is to bring the board’s record before the circuit court. State v. Bledsoe, 426 S.W.2d 737, 740 (Mo.App.E.D.1968).

Shannon v. BROWN AND WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.

167 F. Supp. 493 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 26, 1958

Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, 2 Cir., 1948, 165 F.2d 33 . … These are Collar v. Peninsular Gas Company, Mo.1956, 295 S.W.2d 88 ; Hayman v. Southern Pacific Company, Mo.1955, 278 S.W.2d 749 , and Wooster v. Trimont Mfg. Co., 1947, 356 Mo. 682 , 203 S.W.2d 411 .

Rotich v. State Board of Nursing

534 S.W.3d 297 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2017

ORDER PER CURIAM: Philip Rotich appeals from the decisions of the Missouri State Board of Nursing (Board) and the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC), as affirmed by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, finding cause

Mallon v. Board of Water Commissioners

144 Mo. App. 104 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1910

[Shaw Stocking Co. v. City of Lowell, 199 Mass. 118 ; State ex rel. v. Gosnell, 116 Wis. 606 ; Cooper v. City of Goodland (Cal.), 102 Pac. 244 ; Powell v. Duluth, 91 Minn. 53 ; Gordon v. … It appears clear that uniformity is a reasonable requirement and that the board has a right to prescribe that a certain kind of méter be installed at the expense of the consumer. [State ex rel. v. Goodfellow, 1 Mo.