Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersWA

9,602 results

1.43s

  • Chung Song Ja Corp. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services

    96 F. Supp. 3d 1191 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 11, 2015

    Upon establishing that a position is a “specialty occupation,” the H-1B visa petitioner must also demonstrate that the alien worker is qualified to work in such a position. … To qualify to perform services as Health Services Manager for CSJ under the degree equivalency prong of the applicable regulation, CSJ must establish that Ms.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hagerman v. City of Seattle

    189 Wash. 694 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1937

    Many reasons have been assigned by the various courts for the immunity granted to municipal corporations when acting in a governmental capacity. … Despite these attacks, addressed to the foundation *698 and wisdom of the rule, the courts have, almost without exception, adhered to the precedent established by the decisions.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Mason v. King County

    134 Wash. App. 806 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 28, 2006

    A court may grant relief on a land use decision only if the party seeking *810 relief has carried the burden of establishing that one of the following standards is met: (a) The body or officer that made the land use decision … We will not reverse the land use decision of a local governmental entity unless we find that its application of law to the facts was clearly erroneous. Citizens, 106 Wn. App. at 473 . II.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wakeman

    District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 25, 2020

    Id. at 11. 6 Regarding Brown’s First Amendment claim, Judge Fricke concluded that 7 Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity even if summary judgment was not 8 warranted because it was not clearly … established.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bell v. Olson

    District Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 8, 2022

    In response, Plaintiff argued probable cause is a genuine issue of material 6 fact and that Defendant Olson is not entitled to qualified immunity. (Dkt. … immunity, (Dkt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State Ex Rel. Graham v. City of Olympia

    80 Wash. 2d 672 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1972

    The act provides a method for deposits, investments, and investment deposits (time deposits) of public funds in qualified public depositaries and establishes an elaborate system to collateralize against loss. *678 We quote … Further sections in the act establish additional regulations for the protection of public deposits.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • HomeStreet, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

    139 Wash. App. 827 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 24, 2007

    established that the income in question was withheld from and related to the borrower’s interest payments. … And, in servicing retained sales, HomeStreet retains only the right to provide loan servicing for the purchaser of the loan and to be compensated for those services. 21 Although Home-Street has clearly established that servicing

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Altum

    47 Wash. App. 495 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 27, 1987

    excessive or clearly too lenient. … This evidence establishes that Stallone had the capacity to *506 conform his actions to the law.

    Overruled on other grounds by State v. Parker, 132 Wash. 2d 182 (1997)Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Shoreline Etc. v. Sup. Ct. for King Cty.

    55 Wash. 2d 177 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1959

    Their alleged private school did not legally qualify as such. … The findings and judgment provided in part: "Presently, a full school curriculum has been established in the Wold residence.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Marzan v. Kovacs

    143 Wash. 2d 412 · Washington Supreme Court · Apr 12, 2001

    Paternity was never established. Fleming decided to give up her son for adoption. … In fact, the Legislature indicated so in RCW 26.33.130(2), stating: “[a]n order terminating the parent-child relationship divests the parent and the child of all legal rights, powers, privileges, immunities, duties, and obligations

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re the Personal Restraint of Hinton

    152 Wash. 2d 853 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 18, 2004

    Judges are not immune to these horrors. … Petitioners have established actual and substantial prejudice resulting from constitutional error.

    Cited 119 timesPublished
  • In Re the Recall of Wade

    115 Wash. 2d 544 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1990

    Although school districts have been directed to establish affirmative action plans designed to eliminate discrimination against women, districts may not deny anyone employment on the basis of sex. … The petition does not allege acts "clearly amounting to misfeasance, malfeasance or violation of the oath of office." Teaford , at 584 (quoting Chandler , at 274).

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • In Re PUGET SOUND SAVINGS & LOAN ASS’N

    49 F.2d 922 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 4, 1931

    The statute fixes the relation and establishes the right of shareholders and prescribes the duties and limits the powers of the managing officers (Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. Barrett et al., 160 Mo. App. 164 , 141 S. … Query: May petitioners, if otherwise qualified, maintain their petition after institution by the Attorney General of the proceedings in the state court and placing the estate under liquidation ?

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Dyer

    20 P.3d 907 · Washington Supreme Court · Mar 29, 2001

    In conclusion, the Deputy Director found that Dyer "clearly does not qualify for participation in the extended family visits program based on existing standards." [8] In March 1995, the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board … The majority says DOC's decision to place someone in the program is a matter of discretion, majority at 914, but there is no discretion to deny an entitlement established by rule and required *919 for a qualified recipient

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Richey v. Duncan

    District Court, E.D. Washington · Jul 16, 2024

    Qualified Immunity 19 “Qualified immunity balances two important interests—the need to hold 20 public officials accountable when they exercise power irresponsibly and the … to show a violation of a constitutional 26 right and (2) whether that right was “clearly established at the time of the 27 violation.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sedlacek v. Hillis

    145 Wash. 2d 379 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2001

    Prior judicial decisions may also establish the relevant public policy. … Under the ADA, the term “discriminate” includes “excluding or otherwise denying equal jobs or benefits to a qualified individual because of the known disability of an individual with whom the qualified individual is known

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Intercity Hospital Ass'n v. Squire

    56 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 26, 1944

    This is not supported by the evidence, as it is clearly established that the rental charged during the period here involved and the price ultimately paid for the properties in question were not excessive nor an amount above … The facts clearly show that none of the net earnings inure to the benefit of any private individual. 1 find the plaintiff is entitled to recover herein.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Multicare Health System v. Department of Social & Health Services

    173 Wash. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 29, 2013

    One Medicaid program is the MN program for low-income families. ¶4 To qualify for the MN program, a family’s income has to be less than a certain amount established by regulations (called the “medically needy income level … And the federal regulations clearly contemplate that the Department can adjust the Hospital’s charges based on the spenddown, providing that “States must reduce the amount of provider charges that would otherwise be reimbursable

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Le v. Urquhart

    District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 22, 2021

    Immunity: Deputy Molina asks the Court to decide, or 8 clarify that it has decided, the portion of his earlier motion for summary judgment in which he supposedly invoked qualified immunity as to the Fourteenth … The analysis explained that the questions of whether Deputy Molina used excessive force and whether he 14 violated a “clearly established

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.

    136 Wash. 2d 911 · Washington Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1998

    WWP and the County each claimed that it was immune from liability under Washington’s recreational use statute, RCW 4.24.200-.210. … In order for the legislative intent exception to apply, the regulation establishing a duty must intend to identify and protect a particular and circumscribed class of persons, and this intent must be clearly expressed within

    Cited 101 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.