Case law

Keen v. West

13 Vet. App. 29 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 20, 1999

Counsel argues that in both Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42, 54 (1994), and Zevalkink v. … It also nullifies the previous merits adjudication by the RO because that decision was subsumed in the Board decision. See Yoma v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 298 (1995) (relying on Robinette v.

L.I.C. Assocs. I v. Brown

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 2, 2024

I V. BROWN Opinion of the Court there is no longer a live issue. … I V. BROWN Opinion of the Court based upon common law1 or former North Carolina statutes. See, e.g., Dulin v.

Brown v. Brown

92 Cal. App. 276 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1928

. *279 Four children were born to the parties during their life together: Wilfred Brown, a son, born December 9, 1915, David Brown, a son, and Catherine Brown, a daughter, twins, born September 15, 1918; and Gerald Brown, … The cases of Keesey v. Keesey, 160 Cal. 727 [ 117 Pac. 1054 ], and Sargent v.

Brown v. Brown

232 Iowa 1265 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 9, 1943

Shors v. Shors, 133 Iowa 22 , 110 N. W. 16 ; *1268 Shipley v. Shipley, 187 Iowa 1295, 1306 , 175 N. W. 51 . … See, also, Tallmon v. Tallmon, 166 Iowa 370, 377 , 147 N. W. 746 ; Shipley v. Shipley, 187 Iowa 1295, 1306 , 175 N. W. 51 ; Krotz v. Krotz, 209 Iowa 433, 434 , 288 N. W. 30 .

Brown v. Brown

44 N.H. 281 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jul 1, 1860

. *284 418; Harvey v. Harvey, 2 P. Wms. 22, and note; Heath v. Perry, 3 Atk. 101; Inchedon v. Northcate, 3 Atk. 438; Healey v. Greenbank, 3 Atk. 716 ; Anon., 2 Vern. 199 ; Cloberry v. Lampsen, 2 Freem. 24 ; Smell v. … Dee, 2 Salk. 415; Boe v. Lee, 3 T. R. 41; Cricket v. Dolby, 3 Ves. Jr. 10, and note, p. 17; May v. Wood, 3 Ves. 399, and notes; Booth v. Booth, 4 Ves. 399, and notes a, and 3 ; Hanson v. Graham, 6 Ves. 239 ; Shattuck v.

Brown v. Brown

477 So. 2d 454 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Sep 11, 1985

Specifically, he argues that Janice Brown, his present wife, is now a mortgagor of the home and that the court could not revest title to the home in him and his former wife without Janice Brown's being a party to the case … Smith v. Smith , 443 So.2d 43 (Ala.Civ.App. 1983); Kinsey v. Kinsey , 425 So.2d 483 (Ala.Civ.App. 1983); Marsh v. Marsh , 426 So.2d 847 (Ala.Civ.App. 1983). This case is due to be and is hereby reversed and remanded.

Brown v. Brown

184 Ga. 827 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Nov 10, 1937

To so much of said judgment as refused to have Brown attached for contempt and committed to jail, Mrs. Brown excepted. … The ruling in Justices v.

Stockton Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court

206 Cal. App. 3d 966 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1988

Stewart was assigned to investigate the Arcus Brown killing. Brown was shot with a .22-caliber rifle from a green Pontiac Grand Prix in Stockton. Witnesses said three people were in the car. … (See Constance B. v.

Brown v. Brown

388 So. 2d 623 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 24, 1980

Gordon v. Gordon, 368 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). … Baker v. Baker, 360 So.2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). The transfer of custody of minor children should not be used as a means of punishing recalcitrant parties to dissolution proceedings.

Brown v. Brown

60 So. 3d 1068 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 15, 2011

60 So.3d 1068 (2011) BROWN v. BROWN. No. 3D11-993. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. April 15, 2011. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Certiorari denied.

Alabama State Board of Education v. Brown

565 So. 2d 256 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 22, 1990

Mills v. Ozark City Board of Education, 376 So.2d 747 (Ala.Civ.App.1979). … Dickey v. McClammy, 452 So.2d 1315 (Ala.1984).

Brown v. Brown

550 So. 2d 815 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 27, 1989

BROWN, Appellee, v. Roxie Ann Graham BROWN, Appellant. No. 20797-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September 27, 1989. *816 Piper and Associates by Ramona L. Emanuel, Shreveport, for appellant. … In Walker v.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Brown

10 N.J. Misc. 998 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 27, 1932

One Golda Swerdlow-Badin, coming before Judge Brown on a writ of habeas corpus, was by him ordered released from custody under a commitment of the First District Court of Jersey City in a proceeding under the Medicine and … Judge Brown regarded this as controlling and released the defendant. We think it has nothing to do with the ease. 1. The Practice act is not applicable to these summary proceedings under special statutes. 2.

Ratley v. Sheriff's Civil Service Board

7 Kan. App. 2d 638 · Court of Appeals of Kansas · Jun 17, 1982

In Pugh v. … In Jarvis v.

Brown v. Brown

185 So. 2d 286 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 1966

Citing Carpenter v. … Graves v. Graves, La.App., 122 So.2d 350 ; Vincent v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., 134 So.2d 415 .

Brown v. Brown

4 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1971

Brown, from an order which modified a divorce decree by changing custody of the minor child of the parties, Sherry Lee Brown, to the plaintiff (father), Irvin E. Brown. … Stonebrink v. Stonebrink, 2 Or App 328, 468 P2d 546 (1970); Cooley v. Cooley, 1 Or App 223, 227 , 461 P2d 65 (1969). This *626 principle was well stated in Rea v.

Pettiford-Brown v. Brown

42 A.D.3d 541 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 24, 2007

of Bradley v Wright, 260 AD2d 477, 477 [1999]; see Paul G. v Donna G., 175 AD2d 236, 237 [1991]). … A hearing is not necessary, however, where the court possesses adequate relevant information to make an informed determination of the child’s best interest (see Matter of Hom v Zullo, 6 AD3d 536 [2004]).

Brown v. Brown

64 Mich. 82 · Michigan Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1887

See Ryerson v. Eldred, 18 Mich. 490 ; Taylor v. Boardman, 25 Id. 527 , and notes to those decisions as reprinted.

Brown v. Brown

947 P.2d 307 · Alaska Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1997

On July 6, 1994, we issued a memorandum opinion and judgment, Brown v. Brown, No. 0730 (Brown I). … Brown I, at 3. In Brown I, we reversed “the superior court’s determination that the $250,000 was marital property.”

Brown v. Brown

16 Ark. 202 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1855

the two accounts marked B and C,. referred to in the testimony of James Brown. … ’s contracts, and denied that he ever had anything to do with the money advanced by appel-lee to Isaac Brown; that appellant said to appellee: “ I came here with Isaac Brown, when he came to borrow the money, but did I open