Case law

Brown v. Monserrate

101 A.D.2d 674 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 26, 1984

the spermatozoa found in the victims’ bodies and the human hairs recovered from their beds, and the frequency of occurrence of the same characteristics in the general population (see Matter of Abe A., 56 NY2d 288 ; People v

People v. Brown

295 A.D.2d 442 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 10, 2002

The defendant contends that the prosecutor, in response to his Batson challenge (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 ), failed to relate the prospective juror’s employment as a social worker to the facts of this case. … This argument was not asserted before the trial court and therefore is not preserved for appellate review (see People v Stephens, 84 NY2d 990, 991-992 ).

People v. Brown

287 A.D.2d 341 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 2001

The incidents involved the same or similar statutory provisions and were joinable pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (c) (see, People v Streitferdt, 169 AD2d 171 , lv denied 78 NY2d 1015 ; People v Maldonado, 75 AD2d 558 ). … Defendant has also failed to make a *342 convincing showing that he had. important testimony to give concerning one case and a strong need to refrain from testifying in the other (see, People v Lane, 56 NY2d 1; People v Griffith

Zorbas v. United States Trust Co.

48 F. Supp. 3d 464 · District Court, E.D. New York · Sep 29, 2014

Muller-Paisner v. … See Sanchez v.

Brown v. . Goodwin

75 N.Y. 409 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1878

(Williams v. Peyton, 4 Wheaton, 77 ; Mohan v. Davis, 4 McLean, 211 ; Jackson v. Shepard, 7 Cow., 88 .) Colman v. Shattuck ( 62 N. Y., 348 ), relied upon by appellant, is not in conflict with these views. … See Hilton v. Bender ( 69 N. Y., 75 ). We do not think it needful to examine any other grounds claimed by the respondents, why the plaintiff cannot maintain her action.

Brown v. Moses

191 Misc. 360 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1948

Act, § 1296; Matter of Brenner v. Bruckman, 253 App. Div. 607 , appeal dismissed 278 N. Y. 503 ). … Div. 757 ; Matter of Tiernan v. Walsh, 268 App. Div. 962 , affd. 294 N. Y. 299 ).

People v. Brown

117 A.D.2d 978 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 21, 1986

—Appeal unanimously dismissed as moot (see, mem in People v Brown [Appeal No. 2], 117 AD2d 978 ). (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court, Mark, J.—dismiss count three of indictment.) Present—Doerr, J.

Brown v. State

22 N.Y.3d 1096 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2014

People v. Brown

187 A.D.2d 312 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 1992

(Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]), and the number of shots fired into the victim (see, People v Major, 116 AD2d 594 ). … Finally, we find no basis to disturb the sentencing court’s exercise of discretion (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302 ). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Brown v. Fay

6 Wend. 392 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1831

The language of the statute is very board: “ That no goods or chattels whatsoever in or upon the demised premises. shall be liable to be taken by virtue of any execution,” &c. unless the party suing the execution pay the … Burnet a year’s rent, pursuant to 8 Anne, ch. 14, but it was held, that this was not a case within the statute, which extends only to the immediate landlord; and the case of Carr v.

People v. Brown

114 A.D.3d 1146 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014

People v. Brown

57 A.D.3d 1461 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 31, 2008

lv denied 94 NY2d 924 [2000], 95 NY2d 856 [2000]; see also People v Young, 298 AD2d 952 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 566 [2002]; People v Dixon, 221 AD2d 952 [1995] , lv denied 87 NY2d 972 [1996], cert denied 519 US 842 [1996 … 11 NY3d 786 [2008]; People v Black, 38 AD3d 1283, 1285 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 982 [2007]).

People v. Brown

114 A.D.2d 855 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 1985

lineup was not used, "a lineup is not an essential part of identification procedures as long as the procedure utilized is not so suggestive as to prohibit an independent in-court identification of the defendant” (People v

People v. Brown

104 A.D.3d 864 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 2013

]; People v Bayes, 78 NY2d 546, 551 [1991]; cf. … People v Torres, 72 NY2d 1007 [1988]; People v Pegeise, 195 AD2d 337, 339 [1993]).

Brown v. Richter

27 N.Y.S. 1094 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1894

An examination of the case of Kennedy v. … In the case of Tilden v. Green a different question arose.

People v. Brown

114 A.D.3d 1146 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014

Finnegan v. Brown

43 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 1973

As we held King v. WNY Holding Corp. (38 A D 2d 685): “ Whether a deed, absolute on its face, is a mortgage depends upon the intent of the parties (Matter of Newcourt Realty Holding Corp. v.

Wirt v. Brown

30 F. 187 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · Jan 5, 1887

The motion for an attachment in this case presents the same question that arose in Onderdonk v. Fanning, 2 Fed.

Brown v. Faile

112 A.D. 302 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 20, 1906

. - In Moore v. … In Evans v. Cleveland ( 72 N.

Brown v. Patterson

108 A.D.3d 1133 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 5, 2013