Case law

Portland Police Ass'n v. Civil Service Board

52 Or. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1981

of the Civil Service Board. … Both the city council and the Board possess power within their respective spheres of operation. This power stems from the city charter. See Drake v.

Lovelace v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

183 Or. App. 283 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 14, 2002

In Merrick v. … Lovelace v.

STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. OF WASH. CTY v. Brown

576 P.2d 830 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 1978

576 P.2d 830 (1978) 33 Or.App. 423 IN THE MATTER OF DAVID WALTER BROWN, III, a Child. STATE of Oregon ex rel. Juvenile Department of Washington County, Appellant, v. David Walter BROWN, III, Respondent. … In State v. Briggs, 245 Or. 503 , 420 P.2d 71 (1967), and State v.

DeHart v. Tofte

326 Or. App. 720 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2023

The Ban During the 2021-2022 academic year, each plaintiff served as a director on the School Board, an elected position, with plaintiff Brown as Board Chair and plaintiff Shannon as Vice-Chair. … Schwanz was aware of Brown’s work as a coach at Canby High School because Brown had made statements to local media—namely, the Canby Herald—regarding that work, and had also commented on that work during at least one board

Demeyer v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

206 Or. App. 740 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 12, 2006

The board’s finding was based on a board-ordered psychological evaluation. … Our decision in Guzman v. Board of Parole, 200 Or App 448 , 115 P3d 983 (2005), rev den, 340 Or 34 (2006), is analogous and highly instructive.

Christian Retreat Center v. Board of County Commissioners

28 Or. App. 673 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 1977

In Jehovah’s Witnesses v. … See Western Amusement v. Springfield, 274 Or 37, 40 , 545 P2d 592 (1976); Fasano v. Washington Co. Comm., 264 Or 574 , 507 P2d 23 (1973). 4 See State v.

Cherry Lane, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

84 Or. App. 196 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 4, 1987

Bong v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 13, 2024

Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976). … City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 111 (1983).

Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

246 Or. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 2011

The court remanded for the board to provide a rationale for that inconsistency. Gordon v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 618 , 175 P3d 461 (2007). … In evaluating whether a reasonable person could make the finding that the board made, “we do not substitute our own view *610 of the evidence for the board’s view of the evidence.” Dubrow v.

Ogden Aviation v. Lay

142 Or. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1996

Employer contends that, under Brown v. … In remanding the Board’s determination that a pre-McPherson decision, Sekermestrovich v.

Stogsdill v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

342 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 2007

The Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s order without opinion. Stogsdill v. Board of Parole, 204 Or App 779 , 132 P3d 62 (2006). We allowed review and now affirm the Court of Appeals decision. … Compare Cooper v.

Gress v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

144 Or. App. 375 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1996

Gress v. Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 (1996). We allow the petition to correct a factual error and adhere to our previous opinion as modified. … He points out that in Artway v.

Simon et ux v. Board of County Commissioners

84 Or. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1987

See Cherry Lane, Inc. v. Board of County Comm., 84 Or App 196 , 733 P2d 488 (1987).

Wood v. Oregon State Board of Forestry

5 Or. Tax 193 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 9, 1973

that the board had no legal authority to take the requested action. … Pilgrim Turkey Pckrs. v. Dept. of Rev., 261 Or 305 , 493 P2d 1372 (1972)), but no determination is called for on this issue because it was never pleaded. Brandtjen & Kluge v.

Anderson v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

65 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 1983

The period of commitment ordered by the board shall not exceed the maximum sentence the person could have received had the person been found responsible.” … Petitioner’s remedy was to appeal the trial court’s order, rather than PSRB’s order. 3 See, e.g., State v. Carrol, 54 Or App 445 , 635 P2d 17 , rev den 292 Or 334 (1981).

Coyle v. Brown

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 27, 2024

A at 3, Maney v. Brown, No. 6:20-cv-00570-SB (D. Or. Dec. 9, 2022), ECF No. 421-1. … Similarly, Coyle does not allege any conduct specific to Governor Brown. See Gardner v. Brown, No. 2:21-cv-1256-SB, 2024 WL 1155381, at *6 (D. Or.

Byrnes v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

134 Or. App. 296 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 1995

See, e.g., United States v. … The Board’s argument that petitioner could serve his entire life on parole under either of the two schemes is unpersuasive. In Williams v.

Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

272 Or. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 2015

See Blachana, LLC v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 354 Or 676, 687 , 318 P3d 735 (2014). … See State v.

Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

284 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 2017

In Alexander v. … Morrison v.

Butler v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

194 Or. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 2004

In Shelby v. … See Kansas v.