Case law

Jones v. Brown

70 A.D.2d 897 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 11, 1979

People v. Brown

23 N.Y.3d 930 · New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 2014

Brown v. Lavine

45 A.D.2d 753 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1974

Dauchy v. Brown

41 Barb. 555 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1863

The only point decided in Watson v. Davis, ( 19 Wend. 371 ,) is that a judgment rendered by a justice after the four days given by statute for that purpose is erroneous ; and in Bissell v. … Sibley v.

People v. Brown

304 A.D.2d 321 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 1, 2003

Massillon, 289 AD2d 103 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 731 [2002]; People v Brown, 284 AD2d 191 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 916 [2001]; People v Hamilton, 262 AD2d 34 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 823 [1999]). … (see People v Brock, 293 AD2d 294 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 556 [2002]).

People v. Brown

265 A.D. 153 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 30, 1942

(People v. DeGarmo, 179 N. Y. 130, 135 ; People v. Perry, 277 N. Y. 460, 467 .) … (People v. Zackowitz, supra; Coleman v. People, 55 N. Y. 81, 88 .)

Brown v. Upfold

204 Misc. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1953

Brown, a passenger in the TTpfold automobile was injured. Dougherty sustained serious personal injuries and property damage. Dougherty filed a cross action against the defendant, TTpfold. … In Auchello v. Brooklyn Bus Corp. ( 257 App.

People v. Brown

179 A.D.2d 485 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 16, 1992

that Criminal Term erroneously admitted into evidence the "911” tape recording of the two telephone messages, upon the basis that said recording constituted a present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule (People v … It is presumed that the jury followed the trial court’s prompt and clear curative instructions (see, People v Davis, 58 NY2d 1102 [1983]). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.

People v. Brown

216 A.D.2d 737 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 22, 1995

It has long been established that in order to admit a photograph into evidence, authentication is required (see, People v Byrnes, 33 NY2d 343, 349 ). … are authenticated by testimony of a person familiar with the object portrayed therein that it is a correct representation of such object, in this case one of the handguns found in defendant’s bedroom (see, e.g., Alberti v

People v. Brown

23 N.Y.3d 1007 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2014

Brown v. Elliston

42 A.D.3d 417 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 10, 2007

; Zavurov v City of New York, 241 AD2d 491, 492-493 [1997]; Fischl v Carbone, 199 AD2d 463 [1993]). … Corp., 21 AD3d 824, 825-826 [2005]; Holland v Gaden, 260 AD2d 604, 605 [1999]; Semel v Klein, 233 AD2d *419 492, 493 [1996]; Fischl v Carbone, supra).

Kramer v. Brown

131 A.D.2d 816 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1987

Because the commitment was secured and furnished prior to the purported exercise of the option to cancel, the cancellation was untimely and ineffective (cf., Castaldo v Dalmazio, 129 AD2d 548 ). … Holdings v Cottontail Plaza, 96 AD2d 526 , affd 60 NY2d 997 ; Kypreos v Spiridellis, 124 AD2d 786 ; Mazzaferro v Kings Park Butcher Shop, 121 AD2d 434 ). Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

71 A.D.3d 1043 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 23, 2010

Sorbello, 285 AD2d 88, 96 [2001]; People v Norris, 34 AD3d 501, 502-503 [2006]). … CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]) and, in any event, is without merit, as the supplemental charge conveyed a correct statement of the law (see People v Mateo, 5 AD3d 507 [2004]), and was consistent with the

Hawke v. Brown

50 N.Y.S. 1032 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 26, 1898

And see Hexamer v. Webb, 101 N. Y. 377, 383 , 4 N. E. 755 ; Engel v. Eureka Club, 137 N. Y. 100 , 32 N. E. 1052 . The rule is thus well expressed by Sharswood, J., in Oil Co. v. Gilson, 63 Pa. … Heffernan v. Benkard, 1 Bob. (N. Y.) 432.

Brown v. Keating

166 A.D.2d 220 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 9, 1990

to disturb the IAS court’s finding that an award of exclusive possession was necessary to protect the safety of persons and property, and was warranted by the existence of the extreme domestic strife (see, Delli Venneri v … New York County, granting mutual orders of protection to the parties, was not entitled to collateral estoppel or res judicata effect because the Family Court matter was settled by stipulation, without prejudice (Kaufman v

Brown v. Alexander

120 A.D.3d 1524 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 26, 2014

Crookston v. Brown

140 A.D.2d 868 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1988

We find no error in the fact that respondent disagreed with the Hearing Officer’s recommended penalty (see, Matter of Sanchez v Board of Examiners of Nursing Home Adm’rs, 93 AD2d 916 ). … The court held that "[sjexual harassment in the work place is among the most offensive and demeaning torments an employee can undergo” (supra, at 961; see also, Matter of Brais v Board of Educ., 92 AD2d 706 ).

Hershkovitz v. Brown

2025 NY Slip Op 00436 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 2025

Hershkovitz v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 00436 ) Hershkovitz v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 00436 Decided on January 29, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary … LANDICINO, JJ. 2022-10166 (Index No. 509763/17) [*1]Rita Hershkovitz, respondent, v Douglas E. Brown, Jr., defendant, City of New York, et al., appellants.

People v. Brown

2024 NY Slip Op 06208 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 11, 2024

People v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 06208 ) People v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 06208 Decided on December 11, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … No. 76411/22) [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Donald Brown, appellant. Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Elisabeth R. Calcaterra of counsel), for appellant.

People v. Brown

239 A.D.2d 784 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 22, 1997

(May 22, 1997) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William J. Brown, Appellant. [657 NYS2d 518] Spain, J. … Therefore, we decline to disturb it (see, People v ValdezRodriques, 235 AD2d 627, 630-631; People v Etheridge, 233 AD2d 626, lv denied 89 NY2d 921; People v Valentin, 233 AD2d 623, lv denied 89 NY2d 931). Mikoll, J.