Case law

Kunz v. Personnel Advisory Board

740 S.W.2d 395 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1987

The Board weighed the credibility of the testimony received and was free to accept or reject all or part of any witness’ testimony. Vaughn v. Labor & Indus. Relations Comm’n., 603 S.W.2d 63, 66 (Mo.App., E.D.1980). … The fact finding function rests with the Board. Guntli v. Mcleod, 646 S.W.2d 899, 901 (Mo.App., E.D.1983). We will not substitute our judgment of the evidence for that of the Board. Bell, 711 S.W.2d at 955 .

Missouri Dental Board v. Alexander

628 S.W.2d 646 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 9, 1982

Arizona State Board of Dental Examiners v. Hyder, 114 Ariz. 544 , 562 P.2d 717 (Banc 1977); People ex rel. Dunbar v. Kogul, 179 Colo. 394 , 501 P.2d 738 (1972); Clark v. … Bolton v. Kansas City Board of Healing Arts, 473 F.Supp. 728 (D.Kan.1979); Wall & Ochs, Inc. v. Hicks, 469 F.Supp. 873, 874 (E.D.N.C. 1979); Metpath, Inc. v. Myers, 462 F.Supp. 1104 (N.D.Cal.1978); Metpath, Inc. v.

Angela Brown v. VA Second LP.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 2021

Kingsley v. McDonald, 432 S.W.3d 266, 270 (Mo. App. W.D. 2014) (quoting State ex rel. Hilker v. Sweeney, 877 S.W.2d 624, 628 (Mo. banc 1994)). … Holzum v. Schneider, 342 S.W.3d 313, 316 (Mo. banc 2011)).

Dunning v. Board of Pharmacy

630 S.W.2d 155 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1982

City of Kennett v. Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, 610 S.W.2d 623, 626 (Mo.banc 1981) [quoting Board of Education v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 781-82 (Mo.banc 1976)]. … See Duensing v.

Benford v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jul 19, 2021

Twymon v. Wells Fargo & Co., 462 F.3d 925, 933 (8th Cir. 2006) (“Direct evidence does not include . . . statements by nondecisionmakers.” (cleaned up) (quoting Browning v. … See Grabovac v. Allstate Oms.

Brown v. PN Hirsch & Co. Stores, Inc.

661 S.W.2d 587 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1983

Hirsch and Company Stores, Inc., and Second, Cheetah Maupin stated either: “She [Emma Brown] was caught shoplifting”, or *590 “She [Emma Brown] stole a billfold”, or “She [Emma Brown] had been in the store before taking things … In Williams v.

Patterson v. Warten, Fisher, Lee & Brown, L.L.C.

260 S.W.3d 417 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2008

Theresa Patterson (plaintiff) sued War-ten, Fisher, Lee & Brown, LLC, Robert B. Lee, Chuck D. Brown and Matthew G. … Hampton v. Davenport, 86 S.W.3d 494, 496 (Mo.App.2002).

Anderson v. Personnel Advisory Board

586 S.W.2d 738 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1979

Appellant’s contention that he was not given a written statement of the reason for his dismissal which complied with the requirement of Section 36.380, RSMo 1969, as applied in Wolf v. … Eckles v. Kansas City, 257 S.W. 197 (Mo.App.1923) as holding that dismissal for cause calls for “personal misconduct.”

William Brown Estate Co. v. Wayne County

123 Mo. 464 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 25, 1894

Brown its first mortgage bonds on the St. … Consequently, when the case of the Railway Company v.

Brown v. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co., Philadelphia

263 S.W.2d 893 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1954

In Barr v. … Co. v.

Board of Trustees v. Conway

675 S.W.2d 36 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1984

She cites Board of Public Works v. … See American Fire Alarm Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, 285 Mo. 581 , 227 S.W. 114, 119 (1920). The whole statutory scheme contemplates an autonomous operation.

Cochran v. Board of Education

815 S.W.2d 55 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1991

James, 793 S.W.2d 416, 418 (Mo.App.1990) quoting Bell v. Board of Education, 711 S.W.2d 950, 955 (Mo.App.1986). … Courts generally allow the attorney for the school board wide latitude in participating in dismissal proceedings against a tenured teacher. Ross v. Robb, 662 S.W.2d 257 (Mo. banc 1983); Shepard v.

Walker v. Personnel Advisory Board

670 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1984

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 [1], 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 92 S.Ct. at 2709 [9]. “The hallmark of property ... is an individual entitlement grounded in state law which cannot be removed except ‘for cause.’ ” Logan v.

STATE OF MISSOURI v. GLEN EUGENE BROWN

500 S.W.3d 864 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 2016

U.S. v. … Also, to find Brown guilty of manufacturing, the court necessarily had to find him guilty of the lesser-included attempt. See Spells v.

Brown v. Consolidated, Light, Power & Ice Co.

137 Mo. App. 718 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 31, 1909

Brown fell. Five or six feet north of the latter point was a dead shade tree. … We concede the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Gannon v.

Brown v. Director of Revenue

924 S.W.2d 322 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1996

This case is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Mayo, 915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996).

Brown v. St. Louis Police Department

532 F. Supp. 518 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jan 26, 1982

Defendants in this action are the Saint Louis Police Department and the members of the Board of the Police Department, sued by plaintiff in their official capacities. … Green v. Ten Eyck, 572 F.2d 1233 (8th Cir. 1978); Peterson v. Fink, 515 F.2d 815 (8th Cir. 1972). Accordingly, plaintiff’s complaint shall be dismissed.

Wasem v. Missouri Dental Board

405 S.W.2d 492 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1966

Long v. Willey, Mo., 391 S.W.2d 301 [9]; Anderson v. Curls, Mo.App., 309 S.W.2d 692 [2]. … But even if the Board was prejudiced, that condition evaporated when the case went to trial de novo in the circuit court. Stutz v. Cameron, 254 Mo. 340 , 162 S.W.221 [4]. Next, Dr.

Mission Insurance v. Brown

207 F. Supp. 818 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jul 30, 1962

Defendant Gayla Rae Brown, the driver of one car, was the 19-year old wife of defendant Arnold Ray Brown, who was the son of William A. and Velma N. Brown. … Canadian In *820 demnity Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co., (9th Cir., 1955), 222 F.2d 601 . See also Kaufman v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., (3rd Cir., 1957), 245 F.2d 918 .

Zwick v. Board of Adjustment

857 S.W.2d 325 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 4, 1993

The standard of review for a case such as this is whether the Board of Adjustment’s action is supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record. State ex rel. Rhodes v. … The court may not substitute its own judgment for *328 that of the Board. The court of appeals is not vested with power to supervise the zoning discretion lodged in the Board of Adjustment. State ex rel. Meyer v.