Case law

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2010

Factual Background The Broadcasting Board of Governors is a federal agency responsible for the U.S. Government’s international broadcasting. See Grosdidier v. Chairman, BBG, 560 F.3d 495, 496 (D.C. Cir. 2009). … Brown v. General Serv. Admin, 425 U.S. 820, 821 (1976); see also Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542 (D.C.

Brown v. State Capitol Office of the Governor

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2009

District and FOR THE DISTRICT 0F COLUMBIA B°"k"\-'PTCY Courts Jerome Julius Brown , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) _ v. ) civil Accion No. 1408 ) State Capitol Office of the Governor ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). As drafted, the Complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a).

Brown v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

140 A.3d 1144 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 2016

See Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 83 A.3d 739, 742, 747-49, 750-52 (D.C.2014). The CRB answered both questions in the affirmative. … See Brown, 83 A.3d at 745-46 . We affirm the Board’s decision.

DirecTV, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

837 F.3d 25 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 16, 2016

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. SRINIVASAN, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Act protects employees’ right to engage in concerted activities. … Morissette v.

Brown v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co

495 F.2d 1074 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1974

495 F.2d 1074 162 U.S.App.D.C. 18 Brown v.

Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP v. Internal Revenue Service

537 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2008

This is a FOIA 1 case concerning three requests for documents submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) by Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP (“Mayer Brown”), a law firm. … Specifically, Mayor Brown asserts that “Ms.

Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2010

Civil Action No. 10-534 (CKK) BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS, et al., Defendants. … Plaintiff’s Work History at BBG The Broadcasting Board of Governors is a federal agency responsible for the U.S. Government’s international broadcasting. See Grosdidier v.

Caul v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2016

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Wiley v. Glassman, 511 F.3d 151, 155 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2024

Loving v. IRS, 920 F. Supp. 2d 108, 110 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Citizens for Resp. & Ethics in Wash. v. Off. of Admin., 593 F. Supp. 2d 156, 160 (D.D.C. 2009)); see also Wash. Metro. Area Transit Comm’n v. … See Lair v.

Curtis v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

490 A.2d 178 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1985

Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 381 A.2d 619, 622 (D.C.1977); Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 346 A.2d 252 (D.C.1975). … George Washington University v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 429 A.2d 1342, 1345 (D.C.1981).

Davidson v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

562 A.2d 109 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1989

has authority over him. 5 The Board as a statutory creation has only those powers given to it by statute, Stark v. … Board had the transcript of the Florida proceedings did not deprive him of “fair and adequate notice.” 9 See Ridge v. Police & Firefighters Retirement Bd., 511 A.2d 418, 424 (D.C.1986) (quoting Carroll v.

Bernard Bell v. Harold Brown, Secretary, Department of Defense

557 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1977

In Coles v. Penny, 33 a federal employee was advised by the Board that administrative review of his discrimination complaint was complete but was not told that he had a right to sue within 30 days. … Cass withdrew prior to announcement of the Board’s decision. See text supra at notes 16-20 and notes 17, 19 supra; compare Vindigni v. Meyer, 441 F.2d 376 (2d Cir. 1971). We are mindful that Mr. Cass and Mr.

Williamson v. District of Columbia Board of Dentistry

647 A.2d 389 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 8, 1994

Petitioner relies on Goodman v. Ma ryland, 237 Md. 64 , 205 A.2d 53 (1964) and claims that the Board erred by equating the act of obtaining a prescription with the act of obtaining a controlled substance. … The critical question before the Board was whether the summary suspension of the registration had any legal effect for purposes of D.C.Code § 2-3305.14(a)(3), not the term of the suspension. See Arthur v.

Live365, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2010

Co. v. EPA, 360 F.3d 188, 190-91 (D.C. … Mem. at 20 (quoting Edmond v.

Kabel v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

962 A.2d 919 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2008

The purpose of such review is to ensure “that the Board [has] performed its duty in a ... statutorily correct manner.” Pen-dleton v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 433 A.2d 1102, 1104 (D.C.1981). … See, e.g., Bates v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections & Ethics, 625 A.2d 891, 893 (D.C.1993). The Board’s interpretation of “affiliated” plainly meets the test of reasonableness.

Dyer v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

392 A.2d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1978

Marshall v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C. App., 377 A.2d 429 (1977). If the Board’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence they are conclusive. Washington Post v. … District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 694 (1977).

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Surface Transportation Board

571 F.3d 13 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 2009

Corp. v. … Co. v. STB, 453 F.3d 473, 478-79 (D.C.

Howard University Hospital v. D.C. Department of Employment Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2025

Code § 32-1507(a), (d); Brown v. D.C. Dep’t of Emp. Servs., 83 A.3d 739, 749-50 (D.C. 2014). The ALJ determined that Mr. … Brown, 83 A.3d at 749-50.

Joseph v. District of Columbia Board of Medicine

587 A.2d 1085 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1991

Bender v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 562 A.2d 1205, 1209 (D.C.1989). Accordingly, we must give the Board’s decision substantial weight. Winchester Van Buren Tenants Ass’n v. … At *1090 the very least, the Board could properly conclude that this is so. In Wassermann v.

Brown v. Savings Bank of the Grand Fountain

28 App. D.C. 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1906

In the case of Thaw v. Ritchie, 5 Mackey, 228 , the court said: “The last bill of exceptions is peculiar. … See also Langdon v. Evans, 3 Mackey, 1 ; Cureton v. Dargan, 16 S. C. 619; Pennsylvania Co. v. Horton, 132 Ind. 189 , 31 N. E. 45 ; Springfield F. & M. Ins. Co. v. Sea, 21 Wall. 162 , 22 L. ed. 511; Herman v.