Opinion

Brown v. State Capitol Office of the Governor

Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Jul 29, 2009
Status
Published
On the bench
Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Nature of suit
Civil
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 31.5%

The opinion

to

FILED

JUL 2 9 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District and

FOR THE DISTRICT 0F COLUMBIA B°"k"\-'PTCY Courts

Jerome Julius Brown , )

)

Plaintiff, )

) _

v. ) civil Accion No. 1408

)

State Capitol Office of the Governor )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The plaintiff has filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed in forma

pauperz's. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the

complaint.

Plaintiff, who lists a Maryland address on the complaint, has filed a complaint against a

defendants with Maryland addresses. The complaint appears to consist of only one page, with a

very large number of pages attached. The attachments do not appear related to each other, or to

the one-page complaint, or to the named defendants. The first paragraph of the complaint states

as follows: "Petition for writ and attachments civil rights act 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Fed. Rules Civil

Procedure Rule 4(F)(M)." Compl. at l. The complaint alleges no wrong-doing by the

defendants; indeed, the defendants are not even mentioned in the complaint except in the caption.

The complaint does not allege facts that suggest any cause of action.

Rule 8(a) of the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short

and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain

statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment

for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of

Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a

responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of res

judicata applies. Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

As drafted, the Complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a). Neither the defendants nor the

Court can determine the basis of this Court’s jurisdiction, the nature of plaintiff s claim, or the

relief plaintiff seeks. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

€)¢<c.}€r»»¢e%il

Date: 7 /¢,,,¢/0 j Uniteif States l§istrict Judge

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.