Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1993

10,000+ results

3.07s

  • Brown v. Brown

    112 N.C. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1993

    Cable v. Cable, 76 N.C. App. 134 , 331 S.E.2d 765 , disc. rev. denied, 315 N.C. 182 , 337 S.E.2d 856 (1985); Beightol v. Beightol, 90 N.C. … Latham v. Latham, 178 N.C. 12 , 100 S.E. 131 (1919).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    444 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1969

    Brown, filed suit for divorce against the defendant, Ben Brown, on April 7, 1967. Plaintiff alleged, as grounds for the divorce, general indignities. … Lingenfelder v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    77 Va. 619 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Jul 26, 1883

    their father down until after the death of their father, the said James Brown, Sr., in the spring of the year 1880; the said Abram Brown never denying, but always admitting, by word and act, that they, the said James Brown … death of their father, the said James Brown, Sr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    723 S.W.2d 93 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1987

    See Williams v. Williams, 349 S.W.2d 422, 424 (Mo.App.1961). … See Nilges v. Nilges, 610 S.W.2d 58, 62 (Mo.App.1980); Williams, 349 S.W.2d at 424 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Sep 24, 2012

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Brown

    281 S.W.3d 692 · Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · Apr 30, 2009

    Whether the Board’s order is supported by substantial evidence is a question of law which we review de novo. Montgomery Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Davis, 34 S.W.3d 559, 562 (Tex.2000); Sanchez v. Tex. State Bd. of Med. … Brown refers us to only one collateral-estoppel case, see Cont’l Can Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    2013 Ohio 2709 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 2013

    [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-2709.] … WISE CRB/rad [Cite as Brown v. Brown, 2013-Ohio-2709.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR COSHOCTON COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LINDA L.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carmack v. Trombley

    363 F. Supp. 2d 904 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Mar 31, 2005

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 593 (6th Cir.1989). … In Spier v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    8 Wash. App. 528 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 12, 1973

    Brown appeals from an order of the trial court reinstating alimony payments in the sum of $500 per month to his former wife. … In so holding, we do not ignore the dicta in Flecken-stein v. Fleckenstein, 59 Wn.2d 131 , 366 P.2d 688 (1961) and Hudson v. Hudson, 8 Wn.2d 114 , 111 P.2d 573 (1941).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    302 N.Y. 556 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1951

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lyons v. United States

    18 Cl. Ct. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1989

    See Beckham v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 539, 544 , 375 F.2d 782, 785 (1967); Brown v. … The review is nonadversarial in nature (Armstrong v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 754, 764 (1974); Flute v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    42 Minn. 270 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 3, 1890

    Mary Brown died testate in the year 1884. By her will, she devised to her three sons above named the lot so conveyed to her, share and share alike. … Jur. §§ 468, 517; Gretton v. Haward, 1 Swanst. 409, 433-441, note.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    167 Tenn. 567 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1934

    Brown, have and recover of the complainant, Mary L. … In Young v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brownrigg v. Defrees

    196 Cal. 534 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1925

    In Tebbets v. … (Crane v. French, 38 Miss. 503 ; Nunn v. Edmiston, 9 Tex. Civ. App. 562 [ 29 S. W. 1115 ] ; Bridges v. Stephens, 132 Mo. 524 [ 34 S. W. 555 ] ; Smith v. Gillette, 59 Tex. 86 ; Young v. Sorenson (Tex. Civ.

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    442 S.W.2d 461 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 30, 1969

    Harrington, Tex.Civ.App., 266 S.W. 554 and Graham v. Graham, Tex.Civ.App., 331 S.W.2d 499 (Ref.n. r. e.) In Francis v. … This holding was repeated in Cornell v. Cornell, (Sup.Ct.), 413 S.W.2d 385, 387 . See also Gent v. Gmenier, 435 S.W.2d 293 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    21 La. Ann. 461 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 15, 1869

    Brown, under which the plaintiff claimed title. The plaintiff reserved a bill of exceptions to the ruling of the court in permitting the amendment, but we think the court did not err. … Hughes v. Hamson, 8 N. S. 298; Heirs of Ballie v. Prudhomme, 8 N. S. 338 ; Caldwell v. Fales, 2 La. 130 ; Allain v. Preston, 2 La. 392 and 4 La. 13 ; Knight v. Knight, 12 Ann. 60.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    6 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1851

    (Grover v. Coon, 1 N. Y. 536 .) Appeal dismissed, with costs. 1 To the same effect, see Pugsley v. Kisselburgh, 10 N. Y. 420 ; and Wiggins v. Tallmadge, 7 How. Pr. 404 . … See Wait v. Van Allen, 22 N. Y. 319 ; Flora v. Carbean, 38 Ibid. 111.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    171 N.C. App. 358 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2005

    Montez Brown in the amount of $13,178.48; 2. … Hildebrand v. Vanderbilt, 147 N.C. 640 , 642, 61 S.E. 620, 629 (1908).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    62 Tex. Civ. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 15, 1910

    See Anderson v. Carkins, 135 U. S., 483 ( 34 L. Ed., 272 ), reversing the opinion by the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska of contrary effect cited herein in behalf of appellant. See also Rogers v. … King, 102 Texas, 561 ; Witcher v. Wiles, 33 Texas Civ. App., 69 ( 75 S. W., 889 ). We think the present ease, however, distinguishable from those mentioned in that the bond for title upheld in Witcher v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    245 So. 2d 501 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 10, 1971

    In the instant case plaintiff-appellee filed suit against his wife, defendant-appellant, for separation from bed and board on. the ground of abandonment. … Lodatto v. Lodatto, 238 La. 305 , 115 So.2d 359 ; Ramos v. Ramos, 173 La. 407 , 137 So. 196 ; and St. Martin v. Messersmith, 218 La. 239 , 48 So.2d 909 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.