Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
7.00s
District Court, D. Kansas · Jan 16, 2026
“His response brief failed even to include the terms ‘qualified immunity’ or ‘clearly established.’” Id. … of establishing that the rights in question were clearly established at the time”).
Cited 0 timesUnknown137 F.3d 68 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 13, 1998
Qualified Immunity The doctrine of qualified immunity is well established. … Where a right is clearly established, “the defendants may nonetheless establish immunity by showing that reasonable persons in their position would not have understood that their conduct was within the scope of the established
Cited 135 timesPublishedJohn M. Gainor v. Scott Rogers City of Moorhead, a Minnesota Municipality and John Doe
973 F.2d 1379 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Oct 9, 1992
qualified immunity. … Mitchell once again makes clear what the court’s objective analysis should be on such a motion: Unless the plaintiff’s allegations state a claim of violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity
Cited 73 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 17, 2013
Such a state official is entitled to qualified immunity from actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 “unless the official's conduct violated a clearly established constitutional right.” Pearson v. … Where the law is clearly established, “a caseworker is . . . entitled to qualified immunity if officers of reasonable competence could disagree on the legality of the action at issue in its particular factual context.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedRandall Martin v. Robert Goldsmith
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 31, 2025
Qualified immunity protects government officials from civil liability to the extent that their conduct does not violate a clearly established statutory or constitutional right to which a reasonable person would have known … To overcome the defense of qualified immunity, Martin must show (1) the defendants violated a constitutional right and (2) the right was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct. Doe v.
Cited 0 timesPublished239 F.3d 1183 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Feb 15, 2001
Clearly Established Law The district court also found, in applying the second part of the test, that the constitutional right allegedly violated was clearly established and that defendants acted unreasonably. … While the federal qualified immunity standard focuses on whether a right was clearly established such that the officers would know their conduct violated that right, state law immunity in Wyoming requires that the officers
Cited 47 timesPublished78 Mass. App. Ct. 169 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Oct 25, 2010
It is well established that the MCRA incorporates the standard of immunity for public officials developed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , and accordingly “public officials are not liable under the [MCRA] for their discretionary … acts, unless they have violated a right under Federal or State constitutional or statutory law that was ‘clearly established’ at the time.”
Cited 15 timesPublished31 F.3d 1241 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 4, 1994
It also ruled that none of the individual officials was entitled to qualified immunity because Giuffre had raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether any clearly established laws had been violated by the officials … The “clearly established” standard of Harlow was delineated by the Supreme Court in Anderson v.
Cited 156 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · Aug 30, 2024
Hoover's right to meaningful review of his placement in segregation, it need not address their argument that they are entitled to qualified immunity. See Abbott v. … constitutional right was 'clearly established’ at the time of the official's alleged misconduct.").
Cited 0 timesUnknown256 F.3d 764 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 9, 2001
the policy was in order (as opposed to injunctive relief limited to the single inmate). 113 F.3d at 892 . 2 We decline the prison officials' invitation to affirm the entry of summary judgment on the alternative grounds of qualified … immunity.
Cited 42 timesPublishedLloyd Dela Cruz v. Kauai County Melvin K. Soong, Prosecuting Attorney for the County of Kauai
279 F.3d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 6, 2002
The next step in evaluating the claim of qualified immunity, however, is to determine whether this right was “clearly established.” Saucier, 121 S.Ct. at 2156. … Under this standard, Soong is entitled to qualified immunity. Déla Cruz has not met his burden of proving that the right allegedly violated here was “clearly established” at the time of the alleged violation.
Cited 45 timesPublished175 F. Supp. 3d 69 · District Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2016
Qualified Immunity Police officers are immune from liability in § 1983 in suits brought against them in their individual capacities if “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights … The Second Circuit has explained that “[e]ven whei’e the plaintiffs federal rights and the scope of the official’s permissible conduct are clearly established, the qualified immunity defense protects a government actor if
Cited 16 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 9, 2005
Clearly Established Right Having established that there was a constitutional violation, we turn to the second step of the qualified immunity analysis — whether the constitutional right at issue was clearly established … qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMark A. Campbell v. Kevin Kallas
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 19, 2019
As relevant here, the judge rejected the claim of qualified immunity, concluding that caselaw clearly established a constitutional right to effective medical treatment. We reverse. … Because no case clearly establishes that denying treatment beyond hormone therapy is unconstitu- tional, qualified immunity applies regardless.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · Sep 4, 2024
Amonette’s actions amounted to deliberate indifference and turn directly to … the clearly established prong of the qualified-immunity analysis.” 55 F.4th at 454. … The Fourth Circuit did not address whether the defendant was entitled to qualified immunity, or specifically the second step of the qualified immunity framework—whether the right at issue was “clearly established” at the
Cited 0 timesUnknown874 F.2d 766 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 6, 1989
Nevertheless, they did not waive their right not to be held liable for conduct that did not violate clearly established law. *771 In Harlow , the Supreme Court reshaped the doctrine of qualified immunity and held that “government … Neither Johnson nor Gilmere involved a defense of qualified immunity. .
Modified by Hamm v. Powell, 893 F.2d 293 (1990)Cited 16 timesPublishedRichey v. American Automobile Association, Inc.
380 Mass. 835 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 6, 1980
There may, indeed, be room for the observation that if the present facts should be held to qualify a discharged employee for relief, then a new practical definition might have to be given to employments theoretically terminable
Cited 57 timesPublished912 F.3d 1278 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jan 3, 2019
We reversed the district court’s grant of qualified immunity. … I first address the “clearly established” prong. McCoy v. Meyers, 887 F.3d 1034, 1045 (10th Cir. 2018) (“Courts have discretion to decide the order in which to engage the two qualified immunity prongs.”
Cited 180 timesPublishedRogers v. County of San Joaquin
487 F.3d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 29, 2007
Reasonable Official: 30 In order to assess Royal's claim of qualified immunity, we must conduct a two-part analysis: "1) Was the law governing the official's conduct clearly established? … medical neglect was not clearly established.
Cited 25 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · Sep 10, 2025
established rule forbade the use of force that "occurred" before Miller was "restrained" through "handcuff[s]" (because the officers contest only the clearly established component of the qualified-immunity … established law needed to overcome qualified immunity for the Phase Two conduct.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna