Case law

Carlisa Elmi v. Cheatham County Board of Education

546 S.W.3d 630 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 18, 2017

See Williams v. … See Fleming v.

State of Tennessee v. Michael O. Brown

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 17, 2017

State v. Michael O. Brown, No. 01-C-019203-CC000083, 1991 WL 335920 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Nashville, Nov. 18, 1991), no perm. app. filed. … State v. Brown, 479 S.W.3d 200, 205 (Tenn. 2015). Our Supreme Court held that “Rule 36.1 does not expand the scope of relief and does not authorize the correction of expired illegal sentences.

Maury County v. Board of Equalization

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 10, 2003

Mayor, etc., v. Bank, 1 Swan, 270. City of Nashville v. Smith, 6 S.W. at 274. … In Johnson City v.

Wayland v. National Labor Relations Board

627 F. Supp. 1473 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 11, 1986

casehandling chronology recorded by the investigating Board examiner; two logs of Board investigator’s contacts; seven sets of handwritten notes by Board examiners or their supervisors concerning evidence gathered by investigation … In NLRB v.

Sharon Faye Brown Hartman v. Leonard Lee Hartman

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 20, 2001

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 9, 2001 Session SHARON FAYE BROWN HARTMAN v. … Slagle, Johnson City, Tennessee, for the Appellee, Sharon Faye Brown Hartman.

Southern Railway Co. v. State Board of Equalization

682 S.W.2d 196 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1984

CF Industries v. Tennessee Public Service Commission, 599 S.W.2d 536, 540 (Tenn.1980). … Griffin v. State, 595 S.W.2d 96, 99 (Tenn.Crim.App.1980).

City of Nashville v. State Board of Equalization

210 Tenn. 587 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1962

The next case cited by the Board and by the court below is M. E. Church, South v. Hinton (1892), supra. … The Board relies upon Sunday School Board v.

Lori Lee Grissom (Brown) v, Jeffrey Donald Grissom

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 4, 2001

See Spalding v. Spalding, 597 S.W.2d 739 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980); Isbell v. Isbell, 816 S.W.2d 735 (Tenn. 1991). … In Penland v.

Shannon Ex Rel. Shannon v. Board of Education

199 Tenn. 250 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1955

In Montgomery v. Board of Education of Los Angeles, 137 Cal. … The exact question now before us was considered by the Court of Appeals in Brown v. Newman, 282 S.

Ricky Flamingo Brown, Sr. v. State of Tennessee - Concurring

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 13, 2003

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 14, 2003 RICKY FLAMINGO BROWN, SR. v.

Coffee County Board of Education v. City of Tullahoma

574 S.W.3d 832 · Tennessee Supreme Court · May 8, 2019

v. … Hamby v.

Wright v. Tennessee Board of Dispensing Opticians

759 S.W.2d 929 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 17, 1988

T.C.A. § 4-5-322(h), Big Ford [Fork] Mining Company v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Board, Tenn.App.1981 ( 620 S.W.2d 515 ). … The action of the Board in dismissing charges is not before this Court. Appellant is not in position to complain of error favorable to himself. Hays v. Crawford, 48 Tenn. (1 Heisk) 86 (1870); Britton v.

Brown v. Scott

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 8, 2025

P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v)) (internal quotations omitted). … Brooks v. Rothe, 577 F.3d 701, 709 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting Wojnicz v. Davis, 80 Fed. App’x. 382, 384–85 (6th Cir. 2003)).

State Board of Law Examiners v. Shimer

131 Tenn. 343 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1914

(Mart. & Y.), 137; Smith v. State, 9 Tenn. (1 Yerg.), 228; Lawyer’s Tax Cases, 55 Tenn. (8 Heisk.), 565; Davis v. State, 92 Tenn. (8 Pick.), 634, 23 S. W., 59 ; Brooks v. Fleming, 65 Tenn. (6 Baxt.), 331; In re S. J. … W., 413 ; Hunt v. McClanahan, 48 Tenn. (1 Heisk.), 503; Ingersoll v. Coal Co., 117 Tenn. (9 Cates), 263, 98 S. W., 178 , 9 L. R. A. (N. S.), 282, 119 Am. St. Rep., 1003 , 10 Ann.

Springer v. Williamson County Board of Education

906 S.W.2d 924 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 5, 1995

Someone on the board inquired about other positions available for Mr. Springer. Ms. Schwab replied that there were none, and the board approved the transfer. … McKenna v. Sumner County Bd. of Ed., 574 S.W.2d 527, 534 (Tenn.1978). In Hyde v.

State of Tennessee v. Maurice Brown Sr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 7, 2016

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 2, 2016 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MAURICE BROWN, SR. … Dorantes, 331 S.W.3d at 386 (citing State v. Hanson, 279 S.W.3d 265, 276-77 (Tenn. 2009); State v. Ducker, 27 S.W.3d 889, 897 (Tenn. 2000).

Eddie Phifer v. Board of Parole

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Mar 14, 2001

This court has held that a Board of Paroles decision does not become final, for purposes of triggering the sixty-day deadline, until the Board rend ers a decision on the prisoner’s ap peal. Jordan v. … Similarly, in Knop v.

Doe a v. Coffee County Board of Education

852 S.W.2d 899 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 4, 1992

V. The remaining issue involves the school board’s and its employees’ Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-20-205(1) defense. … ;” (2) that the school board and its employees negligently failed “to implement and enforce an effective school board policy to supervise and protect the plaintiffs from sexual exploitation;” (3) that the school board and

Moss v. TN Board of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 28, 2000

Code Ann. § 40-28-117(a) (1997); Graham v. State, 304 S.W.2d 622, 623-24 (Tenn. 1957). A decision to grant parole is discretionary, and in the sole prerogative of the Tennessee Board of Paroles. See Tenn. … In order to obtain relief via the writ, the petitioner must establish that the Board exceeded its jurisdiction or acted illegally, fraudulently, or arbitrarily. See Arnold v.

Prosterman v. Tennessee State Board of Dental Examiners

168 Tenn. 16 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1934

The circumstance that the Court reviews the same testimony that was adduced before the board indicates that the lawmakers did not contemplate a trial de novo.” To this we cannot agree. Certainly, since Staples v. … Brown, 113 Tenn., 639 , 85 S. W., 254 , the right to a trial de novo under the statutory writ has been settled, unless, as in Nashville v. Martin, 156 Tenn., 443 , 3 S.