Case law

Brown v. Brown

190 A.D.2d 668 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 1, 1993

The proper procedure would have been for the appellant to move to open her default and to vacate the order dated January 28, 1992, and if necessary, appeal from the denial of the motion to vacate the default (see, Grober v … Busigo, 133 AD2d 389 ; Imor v Imor, 114 AD2d 552 ; Calvagno v Nationwide Mut.

Brown v. Brown

635 So. 2d 255 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 6, 1994

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. W.C. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. D.E. BROWN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF James Roy BROWN, et al., Defendant-Appellant. W.C. BROWN, et al., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.E. … Brown pay D.E. Brown, Jr. $65,250.00, the amount W.C. Brown withheld from D.E. Brown, Jr.'s legacy. Stobart v. State Through DOTD, 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993). Interest W.C.

Brown v. Brown

26 So. 3d 1210 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jul 27, 2007

Rosemary Posey Brown (“the wife”) and James Earl Brown (“the husband”) were married on August 10, 1996. … Tibbs v. Anderson, 580 So.2d 1337, 1339 (Ala.1991).

Brown v. Brown

219 Ala. 104 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 28, 1929

Smedley v. Smedley, 30 Ala. 714 . … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JX, concur.

Brown v. Brown

58 Ariz. 333 · Arizona Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1941

. — This is an action by Mary Graves Brown against E. E. Brown, the executor of the estate of E. 0. Brown, deceased, upon a verified claim against the estate. … The rule of law governing such a situation, as announced by this court, is found in Ammerman v.

Brown v. Brown

353 N.C. 220 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 21, 2000

The relevant facts in this case show that plaintiff Gladys Brown and defendant Carroll M. Brown married in 1976 and separated in 1997. … Thus, as held in Caldwell v. Caldwell, 93 N.C.

Brown v. Brown

295 S.C. 354 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · May 9, 1988

Sims v. Sims, 290 S. C. 190, 348 S. … See White v. White, 283 S. C. 348, 323 S.

Brown v. . Brown

103 N.C. 213 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1889

Reynolds v. Flinn, 1 Hay., 123 (106); Avery v. Strother, Conf. R., 434; Lovinggood v. Burgess, Busb., 407, and cases there cited. … In the case of Strother v.

Brown v. Brown

2 N.J. 252 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 16, 1949

Brown, and dismissing a counterclaim of the appellant, Lillian Brown. Both petition and counter-claim were based upon simple desertion. … McShane v. McShane, 45 N. J. Eq. 341, 19 A. 465 (E. & A. 1888); Hague v. Hague, 85 N. J. Eq. 537, 96 A. 579 (E. & A. 1915).

Brown v. Brown

162 Cal. App. 2d 314 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 23, 1958

Brown is to have the right to remove the main house located upon said real property and to retain title to said house as her separate property.” … (Ganann v. Ganann, supra; Couser v. Couser, 125 Cal.App.2d 475, 477-478 [ 270 P.2d 496 ]; Currin v. Currin, 125 Cal.App.2d 644, 652 [ 271 P.2d 61 ]; Spurgeon v.

Brown v. Brown

408 S.C. 582 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jun 4, 2014

In this appeal from the family court, Wendell Brown (Father) argues the family court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Desiree Brown (Mother) following the family court’s decision to apply Worksheet C in calculating Father … See Nemeth v.

United States v. John Thomas Burnette

65 F.4th 591 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 11, 2023

Browne, 505 F.3d 1229, 1253 (11th Cir. 2007). … Evans v.

Brown v. Brown

164 Pa. Super. 350 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1948

Title was taken in the name of June Brown, the plaintiff-appellant, a daughter of Joseph Brown by a former marriage. … Ellen June Brown.” A notice to vacate demised premises, to be effective, must be positive, decisive and free from ambiguity. Fotterall v. Armour, 218 Pa. 73 , 66 A. 1001 .

Brown v. Brown

692 So. 2d 458 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1997

692 So.2d 458 (1997) Joseph BROWN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mary Debra Louis BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-743. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 26, 1997. Grady M. … In Segura v.

Brown v. Brown

670 S.W.2d 167 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 1, 1984

Brown v. Brown, 646 S.W.2d 888, 889 [4] (Mo.App.1983). … In Ex Parte Brown, 530 S.W.2d 228, 231 [1] (Mo. banc 1975); Leslie v. Leslie, 620 S.W.2d 48 , 49—50[1] (Mo.App.1981). The Judgment, Sentence, And Commitment of contempt is vacated. All concur. 1 .

Kelby R. Gordon v. United States

120 A.3d 73 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 2015

v. … v.

Brown v. Brown

822 So. 2d 1119 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Jul 16, 2002

822 So.2d 1119 (2002) Antra BROWN, Appellant, v. Eula Jean BROWN, Appellee. No. 2000-CA-00890-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. July 16, 2002. *1120 John Edward Jackson, Attorney for Appellant. R. … Premeaux v. Smith, 569 So.2d 681, 685 (Miss.1990). Either the child or the custodial parent had the right to bring an action against the defaulting parent for child support in arrearage. Varner v.

Brown v. Brown

410 P.2d 52 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1966

The plaintiff, Mary Ola Brown, sued her husband, William M. … Brown by accepting a nominal sum from and releasing the other driver involved in the collision; that this case is governed by the holdings of this Court in All American Bus Lines v.

Slezak v. Ousdigian

260 Minn. 303 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jun 16, 1961

In Caton v. Board of Education, 213 Minn. 165, 168 , 6 N. … See, Board of Supervisors v. Tureaud (5 Cir.) 228 F. (2d) 895 (dissenting opinion); State ex rel. Smith v. Haveland, 223 Minn. 89 , 25 N. W. (2d) 474 , 174 A. L. R. 544; 67 C. J. S., Parties, § 13(3); 39 Am.

Brown v. . Brown

182 N.C. 42 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 14, 1921

S. v. Jones (at this term), citing Wilson v. Wilson, 114 N. C., 155 ; In re Smith's Will, 163 N. C., 466 ; Todd v. Mackie, 160 N. C., 352 ; *43 Allred v. Kirkman, ib., 392; Worley v. Logging Co., 157 N. C., 490 . … Shives v. Eno Cotton Mills, 151 N. C., 290 ; Brittain v. Westhall, 135 N. C., 492 ; Daniel v. R. R., 136 N. C., 517 ; Biles v. R. R., 139 N. C., 528 .