Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

1.59s

  • Hills v. Board of Parole

    313 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

    The case is remanded to the Board of Parole for further proceedings. Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 313 Or 234 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lofft v. State Board of Higher Education

    89 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 1988

    Maher v. Gagne, 448 US 122, 133 , 100 S Ct 2570 , 65 L Ed 2d 653 (1980). In Rogers v. … Maher v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Simpson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    237 Or. App. 661 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2010

    Martin v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 147, 157 , 957 P2d 1210 (1998); see also City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, 292 Or 266, 271-72 , 639 P2d 90 (1981). … However, the board does not contradict that assertion, and we accept it as true for purposes of our analysis. 4 See, e.g., United States v. T.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Cyrus v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES

    226 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2009

    See PGE v. … See Houston v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Einstein v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    226 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2009

    Einstein v. PSRB, 330 Or 121, 127 , 998 P2d 654 (2000). “Substantial evidence exists to support a finding of fact when the record, viewed as a whole, would permit a reasonable person to make that finding.” … Id. at 128 n 4 (noting that PSRB is not required to accept testimony without considering the entire record); Martin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Akers v. Board of Parole

    126 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1994

    He also challenges the refusal of the Board to disclose to him a letter it considered in imposing the condition. The withholding of the letter was not error. Flowers v. … Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993). Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fillinger v. Boeing Co. (In re Fillinger)

    290 Or. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 2018

    SAIF v. Strubel , 161 Or. … The litigation of this case has been somewhat complicated by the fact that, at the time the board issued its order, our opinion in Brown v. SAIF , 262 Or. App. 640 , 325 P.3d 834 (2014), controlled the analysis.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Civil Service Board

    39 Or. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1979

    Civil Ser., Washington Co., 232 Or 327 , 375 P2d 417 (1962); Joseph v. Lowery, 261 Or 545 , 495 P2d 273 (1972); State ex rel Town Concrete v. Andersen, 264 Or 565 , 505 P2d 1162 (1973); Cole v. … Zidell Explorations, Inc., 275 Or 317 , 550 P2d 1194 (1976); Coos-Curry Elec. v. Curry County, 26 Or App 645 , 554 P2d 601 (1976); Troyer v. Pub. Wel. Div., 30 Or App 569 , 567 P2d 594 ; and Emp. Div. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Howey v. Board of Parole

    119 Or. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 1993

    Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507, 510 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). We have authority to review the underlying order under ORS 144.335(2). Petitioner was convicted of raping his teenage stepdaughter. … The Board answers by quoting Moore v. Ore.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lasalle v. Board of Parole

    303 Or. 665 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

    For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 632 , 740 P2d 760, 769 (1987), I respectfully dissent from that portion of this opinion dealing with a “detailed explanation,” under ORS 144.135, of the action taken by the Board of Parole with

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Board of Parole

    303 Or. 668 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

    At petitioner’s prison term hearing, the Board of Parole (Board) had previously established a history/risk score of 4, crime category 6 with a matrix range of 74 to 100 months and set petitioner at 92 months with a release … Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brush v. State Board of Higher Education

    245 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1966

    . *375 Our decision here is controlled by Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 US 360 , 84 S Ct 1316 , 12 L ed 2d 377 (1964). … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624 , 87 L ed 1628, 63 S Ct 1178 , 147 ALR 674 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McClure v. Prison Industries Board

    148 Or. App. 477 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 18, 1997

    Edmunson v. Dept. of Ins. and Finance, 314 Or 291, 295 , 838 P2d 589 (1992). … In this facial challenge to the validity of the Board’s *483 administrative rules, we will not consider the individual facts of this case, but only the rule itself. See AFSCME Local 2623 v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wambold v. Board of Parole

    110 Or. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1991

    ORS 144.335; Denham v. Board of Parole, 106 Or App 234 , 806 P2d 1167 (1991). Judicial review dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry

    131 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 7, 1994

    In Boise Cascade Corp. v. … A similar jurisdictional question was addressed at length and resolved in Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), supra.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. Board of Forestry

    250 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1969

    Early in 1942, prior to the completion of the foreclosure proceeding, the Board of Forestry acquired from Polk County a deed to an undivided three quarter interest in the disputed property, making the Board a tenant in common … See also Deardorff v. Hood River County, 84 Or Adv Sh 175, 246 Or 7 , 423 P2d 952 (1967); Evergreen Timber v. Hood River Co., 84 Or Adv Sh 205, 246 Or 11 , 423 P2d 963 (1967); Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • King v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

    283 Or. App. 689 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2017

    The board’s order does not disclose whether the board would have reached the same determination regarding petitioner’s capacity for rehabilitation had it not relied on the erroneous factual findings. … Under those circumstances, we must remand to the board to reconsider its decision without relying on the erroneous factual findings. See Reguero v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. for Lane County v. Brown

    19 Or. App. 427 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1974

    The defendant, Arnold Ray Brown, a child, age 16, appeals from the order and finding entered by the Lane County Juvenile Court after an extended trial that the defendant had committed an assault by stabbing upon two other … Dept. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Gambee v. Oregon Medical Board

    261 Or. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 2014

    board orders. … ORS 183.482(8)(c); see Spray v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Meier v. Board of Parole

    115 Or. App. 95 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992

    Howard v. State Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.