Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.59s
313 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992
The case is remanded to the Board of Parole for further proceedings. Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 313 Or 234 , 833 P2d 1268 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLofft v. State Board of Higher Education
89 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 1988
Maher v. Gagne, 448 US 122, 133 , 100 S Ct 2570 , 65 L Ed 2d 653 (1980). In Rogers v. … Maher v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedSimpson v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
237 Or. App. 661 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2010
Martin v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 147, 157 , 957 P2d 1210 (1998); see also City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, 292 Or 266, 271-72 , 639 P2d 90 (1981). … However, the board does not contradict that assertion, and we accept it as true for purposes of our analysis. 4 See, e.g., United States v. T.
Cited 9 timesPublishedCyrus v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTES
226 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2009
See PGE v. … See Houston v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedEinstein v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
226 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2009
Einstein v. PSRB, 330 Or 121, 127 , 998 P2d 654 (2000). “Substantial evidence exists to support a finding of fact when the record, viewed as a whole, would permit a reasonable person to make that finding.” … Id. at 128 n 4 (noting that PSRB is not required to accept testimony without considering the entire record); Martin v.
Cited 0 timesPublished126 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1994
He also challenges the refusal of the Board to disclose to him a letter it considered in imposing the condition. The withholding of the letter was not error. Flowers v. … Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993). Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFillinger v. Boeing Co. (In re Fillinger)
290 Or. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 2018
SAIF v. Strubel , 161 Or. … The litigation of this case has been somewhat complicated by the fact that, at the time the board issued its order, our opinion in Brown v. SAIF , 262 Or. App. 640 , 325 P.3d 834 (2014), controlled the analysis.
Cited 2 timesPublished39 Or. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1979
Civil Ser., Washington Co., 232 Or 327 , 375 P2d 417 (1962); Joseph v. Lowery, 261 Or 545 , 495 P2d 273 (1972); State ex rel Town Concrete v. Andersen, 264 Or 565 , 505 P2d 1162 (1973); Cole v. … Zidell Explorations, Inc., 275 Or 317 , 550 P2d 1194 (1976); Coos-Curry Elec. v. Curry County, 26 Or App 645 , 554 P2d 601 (1976); Troyer v. Pub. Wel. Div., 30 Or App 569 , 567 P2d 594 ; and Emp. Div. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished119 Or. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 1993
Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507, 510 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). We have authority to review the underlying order under ORS 144.335(2). Petitioner was convicted of raping his teenage stepdaughter. … The Board answers by quoting Moore v. Ore.
Cited 0 timesPublished303 Or. 665 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987
For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Anderson v. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 632 , 740 P2d 760, 769 (1987), I respectfully dissent from that portion of this opinion dealing with a “detailed explanation,” under ORS 144.135, of the action taken by the Board of Parole with
Cited 0 timesPublished303 Or. 668 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987
At petitioner’s prison term hearing, the Board of Parole (Board) had previously established a history/risk score of 4, crime category 6 with a matrix range of 74 to 100 months and set petitioner at 92 months with a release … Petitioner seeks review, alleging that the Board failed to satisfy the requirements of ORS 144.135. Petitioner’s procedural contentions are answered in Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrush v. State Board of Higher Education
245 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1966
. *375 Our decision here is controlled by Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 US 360 , 84 S Ct 1316 , 12 L ed 2d 377 (1964). … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624 , 87 L ed 1628, 63 S Ct 1178 , 147 ALR 674 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedMcClure v. Prison Industries Board
148 Or. App. 477 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 18, 1997
Edmunson v. Dept. of Ins. and Finance, 314 Or 291, 295 , 838 P2d 589 (1992). … In this facial challenge to the validity of the Board’s *483 administrative rules, we will not consider the individual facts of this case, but only the rule itself. See AFSCME Local 2623 v.
Cited 0 timesPublished110 Or. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1991
ORS 144.335; Denham v. Board of Parole, 106 Or App 234 , 806 P2d 1167 (1991). Judicial review dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry
131 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 7, 1994
In Boise Cascade Corp. v. … A similar jurisdictional question was addressed at length and resolved in Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), supra.
Cited 5 timesPublished250 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1969
Early in 1942, prior to the completion of the foreclosure proceeding, the Board of Forestry acquired from Polk County a deed to an undivided three quarter interest in the disputed property, making the Board a tenant in common … See also Deardorff v. Hood River County, 84 Or Adv Sh 175, 246 Or 7 , 423 P2d 952 (1967); Evergreen Timber v. Hood River Co., 84 Or Adv Sh 205, 246 Or 11 , 423 P2d 963 (1967); Johnson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKing v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
283 Or. App. 689 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2017
The board’s order does not disclose whether the board would have reached the same determination regarding petitioner’s capacity for rehabilitation had it not relied on the erroneous factual findings. … Under those circumstances, we must remand to the board to reconsider its decision without relying on the erroneous factual findings. See Reguero v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. for Lane County v. Brown
19 Or. App. 427 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1974
The defendant, Arnold Ray Brown, a child, age 16, appeals from the order and finding entered by the Lane County Juvenile Court after an extended trial that the defendant had committed an assault by stabbing upon two other … Dept. v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedGambee v. Oregon Medical Board
261 Or. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 2014
board orders. … ORS 183.482(8)(c); see Spray v.
Cited 0 timesPublished115 Or. App. 95 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992
Howard v. State Board of Parole, 105 Or App 288 , 804 P2d 509 , rev den 311 Or 432 (1991).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna