Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.72s
112 A.D. 900 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1906
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text286 A.D. 956 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1955
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text127 A.D.3d 608 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 2015
Cited 0 timesPublished2025 NY Slip Op 02870 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 13, 2025
Brown v Gutiez ( 2025 NY Slip Op 02870 ) Brown v Gutiez 2025 NY Slip Op 02870 Decided on May 13, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … William Nathaniel Brown, respondent pro se.
Cited 0 timesPublished110 A.D.3d 481 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 8, 2013
The court properly exercised its discretion when it *483 denied defense counsel’s midtrial applications for yet another competency examination (see Pate v Robinson, 383 US 375 [1966]; People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757 [1999 … ], cert denied 528 US 834 [1999]; People v Morgan, 87 NY2d 878 [1995]).
Cited 3 timesPublished196 A.D.2d 465 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 26, 1993
"The People have a duty to prevent the destruction of evidence until all appeals have been exhausted” (People v Watkins, 189 AD2d 623, 624 , lv denied 81 NY2d 978 ). … The prosecutor’s comments during summation that may have implicated defendant’s right not to testify were responsive to trial counsel’s summation (People v McIntyre, 177 AD2d 255 , lv denied 79 NY2d 950 ), and the jury is
Cited 7 timesPublished119 A.D.3d 953 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 30, 2014
, 492 [2008]; People v Finger, 95 NY2d 894, 894 [2000]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858, 859 [1987]; People v Stahl, 53 NY2d 1048, 1050 [1981]). … at 492 ; People v Finger, 95 NY2d at 894 ; People v Gray, 86 NY2d at 19 ; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d at 859 ; People v Stahl, 53 NY2d at 1050 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished89 Misc. 538 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1915
Lesley v. Johnson, 41 Barb. 359, 361 ; Powell v. Jones, 44 id. 524; Guggenheimer v. Geiszler, 81 N. Y. 203 ; Morton v. Thurber, 85 id. 550. … This was answered by Brown, who had then become Mrs. McLean’s attorney. Mrs. McLean died February 5,1913. Brown was then appointed executor of her will.
Cited 8 timesPublished84 A.D.3d 1143 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 2011
In opposition, Comerford and Samuels failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether Brown was acting in the scope of her *1145 employment at the time of the accident (see generally Monioudis v City of New York, 82 … AD3d 945 [2011]; McCaffery v Wright & Co.
Cited 2 timesPublished34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 228 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1882
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 537 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1884
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text114 A.D. 912 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 15, 1906
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text124 A.D. 941 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1908
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text151 A.D. 940 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1912
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text13 N.Y.2d 667 · New York Court of Appeals · May 9, 1963
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text208 N.Y. 578 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1913
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text158 N.Y. 360 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1899
BROWN, [l. s.] ' « A. WESTON & SON. … Our attention has been called to the cases of Ballard v. Burgett ( 40 N. Y. 314 ), Austin v. Dye ( 46 N. Y. 500 ), Comer v. Cunningham ( 77 N.
Cited 11 timesPublished194 A.D.2d 405 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1993
Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139 ), and that "it is the function of the administrative agency rather than that of the reviewing court to weigh the evidence and resolve conflicting testimony” (Matter of Ferriso v Ward, 161 AD2d
Cited 6 timesPublished243 A.D.2d 363 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 23, 1997
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna