Case law

State v. Brown

310 N.C. 563 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1984

In State v. Childers, 41 N.C. … State v.

Board of Health v. Board of Commissioners

220 N.C. 140 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 1941

Presumably, both boards have acted under legislative authority. Board of Education v. Kenan, 112 N. C., 566 , 17 S. E., 485 . … E., 3 ; Kistler v. R. R., 164 N. C., 365 , 79 S. E., 676 ; Parker v. Bank, 152 N. C., 253 , 67 S. E., 492 ; Millikan v. Fox, 84 N. C., 107 ; Blake v. Askew, 76 N. C., 325 ; McKethan v. Ray, 71 N. C., 165 ; Bates v.

State v. Brown

248 N.C. App. 72 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 21, 2016

STATE V. … STATE V.

State v. Brown

233 N.C. 202 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1951

returns of the preceding year but also “a list of names of persons who do not appear upon the tax lists, who are residents of the county and over twenty-one years of age,” to be prepared in each county by the Clerk of the Board … Speller, 230 N.C. 345 , 53 S.E. 2d 294 ; S. v. Brown, 231 N.C. 152 , 56 S.E. 2d 441 . After a preliminary investigation, pursuant to the procedure outlined in S. v.

Brown v. . Turner

70 N.C. 93 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1874

A judgment in mandamus , does not decide the title, for if the plaintiff obtained judgment against Howerton, it would not estop Turner from bringing his action against the plaintiff, Brown. … *Page 95 The right sought to be tried, is not one between Brown and Howerton, but between Turner and Brown, yet the mandamus is against Howerton, a third party, who has no interest in the controversy, except to know who is

Brumble v. . Brown

71 N.C. 513 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Haughton v. Leary, 3 D. & B., 21. And if not barred by the statute at that time, it does not become so after-wards during the pending of the action. Walker v. Clements, 15 A. & E.; N. S., 1046; 69 E. C. L. R.

Brown v. . Foust

64 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1870

Treasury notes, at the time of the verdict: Garrett v. Smith, ante 93.

State v. Brown

253 N.C. 195 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 12, 1960

The principles of law applied by this Court in State v. Wilson, 216 N.C. 130 , 4 S.E. 2d 440 , are controlling on this appeal. … State v. Wilson, supra. ■ *197 The judgment of July 1960 recites that the court heard evidence “of the State and the defendant.”

State v. Brown

306 N.C. 151 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 13, 1982

Brown testified that he was in Moore County jail as a prisoner at the time defendant was placed in the jail. Brown asked defendant what he was charged with and defendant said that he was charged with a double homicide. … Here the trial court obviously deemed Brown’s testimony to be relevant and to have probative value.

Brown v. . Coble

76 N.C. 391 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1877

There is no allegation that the payment was fraudulently made as in Dockery v. French, 73 N. C. 420 . 2. … It is in. a certain County, on a certain stream and is that piece of land of which John Brown died seized and possessed.

State v. . Brown

113 N.C. 645 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1893

State v. Cowan, 29 N. C., 239, 250 . … State v. Harris, 106 N. C., 682, 687 . No Error.

State v. Brown

315 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1985

The Brown decision, however, did not address specific allegations of illegality nor premise its ruling on those grounds. … State v. Bullard, 312 N.C. 129 , 322 S.E. 2d 370 (1984); State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982).

Mitchell v. . Brown

88 N.C. 156 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 5, 1883

The answer admits the defendant to be in possession of a part only of the land embraced in the plaintiff’s boundaries, and, denying his title thereto, avers the same to belong to his father, *157 Henry Brown, who let him … Is the land in controversy in this action, and no other, the same that was in controversy in the action of Henry Brown against Moses Mitchell, Gabriel Mitchell, Mexico Mitchell and Doctor Mitchell, tried at fall term, 1874

Loosvelt v. Brown

235 N.C. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 15, 2014

LOOSVELT, Plaintiff/Father, v. Mecklenburg County No. 11-CVD-21739(DH) STACY LEIGH BROWN, Defendant/Mother. … V.

State v. Brown

320 N.C. 179 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1987

See State v. Brown, 306 N.C. 151, 180 , 293 S.E. 2d 569, 588 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (1982). … Brown, 306 N.C. 151 , 293 S.E. 2d 569 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1080 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 642 (victims stabbed repeatedly, then disemboweled); State v.

State v. Brown

300 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1980

Appeal of Defendant Brown Defendant Brown first assigns as error the denial of his motion to sever the charged offenses. … State v. Scott, supra.

State v. . Brown

206 N.C. 747 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 20, 1934

At the March Term, 1934, Forsyth Superior Court, the defendant herein, J ames Brown, was tried upon an indictment charging him with burglary in the first degree, C. … S. v. Goldston, 201 N. C., 89 , 158 S. E., 926 . No error appears on the face of the record. S. v. Edney, 202 N. C., 706 , 164 S. E., 23 ; S. v. Hamlet, ante, 568. Appeal dismissed.

Ashley v. . Brown

198 N.C. 369 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 19, 1930

Ed., 1149 ; Wilkinson v. Wright, 1 N. C., 422 ; Peace v. Nailing, 16 N. C., 289, 296 ; Merwin v. Ballard, 66 N. C., 398 ; Greer v. Asheville, 114 N. C., 678 ; Mann v. Allen, 171 N. C., 219 ; Waddill v. Masten, 172 N. … See Poti v. N. E. Road Machinery Co., 140 Vt., 587 ; S. v. Johnston, 79 N. J. L., 49, 74 At., 538 ; Kane v. State, 81 N. J. L., 594, 80 At., 453 ; Kane v. New Jersey, 242 U. S., 160 , 62 L. Ed., 222 .

Spencer v. . Brown

214 N.C. 114 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 21, 1938

Williams v. Coach Co., 197 N. C., 12 , 147 S. E., 435 , and cases cited. … Williams v. Coach Co., supra; Comr. of Banks v. Mills, 202 N. C., 509 , 163 S. E., 598 ; S. v. Bryant, 213 N. C., 752 , 197 S. E., 530 .

Roulhac v. . Brown

87 N.C. 1 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1882

Peebles v. Foote, 83 N. C., 102 . … Sanderson v. Daily, 83 N. C., 67 ; Mabry v. Henry, 83 N. C., 298 . A case in point is State v. Evans, 74 N. C., 324 , where a prisoner was-put in jail for larceny, and the jury not being able to agree were discharged.