Case law

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.

129 N.J. Eq. 379 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 25, 1941

Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co., 128 N. J. Eq. 197. The present appeal is from an order of July 9th, 1940,' striking certain portions of the defendant’s answer. Julius M. … It was clearly pointed out in Brown v.

Den ex dem. Wagenen v. Brown

26 N.J.L. 196 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1857

Den v. Van Ness, 5 Halst. 102; Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 1 Green’s Ch. R. 356; Woodhull v. Reid, 1 Harr. 128 ; Thompson v. … Cited in Duncan v. Smith, 2 Vr. 329 ; Lamb v. Cannon, 9 Vr. 364 .

Morgan v. Board of Commissioners

104 N.J.L. 13 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 23, 1927

Oil Co. v. Gloucester, 102 N. J. L. 502; Long v. Scott, 133 Atl. Rep. 767 ; Bauer v. Paterson Fire, &c., Commissioners, 102 Id. 235; Wittkop v. Garner, 132 Atl. Rep. 339 . See, also, Larkin Co. v. Schwab, 242 N. … Savitz-Denbigh Co. v. Bigelow, 134 Atl. Rep. 557 ; Bauer v. Paterson Fire, &c., Commissioners, supra; Wittkop v. Garner, supra; Schait v. Senior, 97 N. J.

Den ex dem. Brown v. Mugway

15 N.J.L. 330 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1836

I need now only refer to the cases there cited in proof of this universal rule, and a subsequent case of Nevison v. Taylor, 3 Halst. 43. Wherefore I am of opinion that judgment of non-suit be entered with costs. … Cited in Den v. Young, 4 Zab. 782 ; Den v. Lake, 1 Dutch. 611.

Board of Police Commissioners v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System

117 N.J. 664 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 26, 1989

Brown v. Street Lighting District No. 1

70 N.J.L. 762 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 20, 1904

Apgar v. … In Lane v.

Board of Education v. Bidgood

11 N.J. Misc. 735 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 29, 1933

Frederick v. Board of Health,, 82 N. J. L. 200; 82 Atl. Rep. 528 . … Lewis v. Jersey City, 51 N. J. L. 240; 17 Atl. Rep. 112 ; also a janitor of a court house duly elected by the board of freeholders. Daily v. Essex, 58 N. J. L. 319; 33 Atl.

Stockton v. Board of Education

72 N.J.L. 80 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 27, 1905

third section, be subject to appeal to the state board of education. … Jefferson v. Board of Education, 35 Vroom 59; Draper v. Commissioners of Public Instruction, 37 Id. 54. The rule to show cause is discharged.

Masse v. Board of Trustees

175 N.J. Super. 325 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 4, 1980

The board’s determination followed its administrative practice of long standing. It was derived from the principle expressed in Plunkett v. … Board of Comm’rs of Hartford, 129 Conn. 419 , 29 A.2d 452 (Sup.Ct.Err.1942); Williams v. Smith, 360 So.2d 417 (Fla.Sup.Ct. 1978). See Spencer v. Bullock, 216 F.2d 54 (D.C.Cir.1954); City of Frederick v.

Board of Educ. of Borough of Merchantville v. BOARD OF EDUC.

204 N.J. Super. 508 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Sep 30, 1985

Super. 508 (1985) 499 A.2d 523 BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF MERCHANTVILLE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. … While we are in no way bound by the State Board's interpretation of the statute, see Mayflower Securities v.

Bustard v. Board of Review

401 N.J. Super. 383 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 15, 2008

Board of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 210-11 , 704 A. 2d 547 (1997); Close v. … See Bailey v. Board of Review, 339 N.J.Super. 29, 32-33 , 770 A. 2d 1216 (App.Div.2001); cf. George Harms Constr. Co. v. Turnpike Auth., 137 N.J. 8, 27 , 644 A. 2d 76 (1994) Texter v.

FLOREXIL v. Board of Review

208 N.J. 336 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 9, 2011

27 A.3d 949 (2011) 208 N.J. 336 FLOREXIL v. BOARD OF REVIEW. Nos. C-8 September Term 2011, 067737. Supreme Court of New Jersey. September 9, 2011. Petition for Certification Denied.

Nuveen Municipal Trust v. Withumsmith + Brown, P.C.

213 N.J. 527 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 11, 2013

Alexander v. Board of Review

405 N.J. Super. 408 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 27, 2009

ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, Department of Labor, and County of Union, Respondents. DOCKET NO. A-1592-07T2. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted November 13, 2008. … See N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(d). [2] In Bonilla v.

Castellucci v. Board of Review

168 N.J. Super. 301 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 21, 1979

CASTELLUCCI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND XEROX CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. … Kugel v. Board of Review, 66 N.J. Super. 547, 550 (App. Div. 1961).

Garber v. Board of Health

4 N.J. Misc. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 21, 1926

which time the board undertook to nullify its action. … As to the ordinance of October 8th, that does not change the situation, for it- was an ex post facto ordinance, and not controlling on him or on the board with reference to his license. Reimer v. Dallas, 3 N. J. Adv.

Turner v. First Union National Bank

162 N.J. 75 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 9, 1999

In one of the underlying actions, Turner v. First Union Nat'l Bank (“Turner ”), the petitioner was unrepresented. In Iversen v. Collective Bank (“Iverson ”) and Kelly v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. … State v. Gill, 47 N.J. 441, 444 , 221 A.2d 521 (1966); State v. Campobasso, 125 N.J.Super. 103, 108 , 308 A.2d 674 (Law Div.1973).

Nota v. Board of Review

231 N.J. Super. 341 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1989

Super. 341 (1989) 555 A.2d 710 NEIL NOTA, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ILN ASSOCIATES, INC., RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted February 1, 1989. … Restaurant Assn. v. Holderman, 24 N.J. 295, 300 (1957).

Doben v. Board of Health

3 N.J. Misc. 38 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 31, 1924

A rule to show cause was allowed in this case July 31st, 1924, why a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus should not issue, compelling the board of health of the city of Paterson and Frederick P. … Section one (1) of said ordinance provides "such permit ma.y be issued by said board of health upon the1 payment of: $25.” The board has a discretion in the matter of issuing or refusing permits.

State v. Board of Education

58 N.J.L. 347 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1895

Stat., p. 3060), provides that the legal voters of a school district, either at an annual meeting or at a special meeting called for that purpose, may, by the consent of a majority of those present, authorize the board of … For reversal—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Gum-mere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Mag-ie, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Sims, Smith, Talman. 12.