Opinion

Doben v. Board of Health

  • 3 N.J. Misc. 38
  • 127 A. 38
  • 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 2
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Dec 31, 1924
Status
Published
Author
Oukiam
On the bench
Oukiam
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 73.3%

The opinion

Pee Oukiam.

A rule to show cause was allowed in this case July 31st, 1924, why a peremptory or alternative writ of mandamus should not issue, compelling the board of health of the city of Paterson and Frederick P. Lee, health officer of the city to grant and, issue to the relator a permit to engage in the business of preparing live fowl for sale, or selling live fowl, or slaughtering poultry at No*. 292 Godwin street, Paterson, *39 New Jersey, upon paying the required fee of $25 for such permit, under an ordinance of the city of Paterson. Section one (1) of said ordinance provides "such permit ma.y be issued by said board of health upon the1 payment of: $25.” The board has a discretion in the matter of issuing or refusing permits.

Wc think a writ of mandamus should be denied, and it is so ordered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.