Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.06s
Caster v. State Board of Parole
58 Or. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 1982
However, the Board in its brief states: «* * * [Although] not raised by petitioner, it is * * * apparent that the Board has failed to schedule parole release ‘until a specified future date’ as required by ORS 144.125(3).” … Pursuant to this concession, the case is remanded to the Board to set a new release date.
Cited 0 timesPublished332 Or. App. 767 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2024
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STEPHEN LEE BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Affirmed. 768 Brown v. Highberger LAGESEN, C. J. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying habeas corpus relief.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKleikamp v. Board of County Commissioners
240 Or. App. 57 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010
KLEIKAMP and Friends of Yamhill County, Inc., an Oregon non-profit corporation, Petitioners-Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF YAMHILL COUNTY, Respondent-Respondent, and Glenn H. Gregg, Donald E. … See Friends of Yamhill County, 237 Or.App. 149 , 238 P.3d 1016 ; Biggerstaff v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or. App. 46 , 245 P.3d 688 (2010); Damman v.
Cited 0 timesPublished334 Or. App. 299 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 7, 2024
Affirmed. 300 Martin v. Brown HELLMAN, J. Petitioner appeals from a judgment that denied her petition for post-conviction relief. … Trujillo v. Maass, 312 Or 431, 435, 822 P2d 703 (1991).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished331 Or. App. 768 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 10, 2024
OAR 291-063-0120(2)(d). 770 Venables v. Brown Petitioner then initiated the instant post-conviction proceedings. … ); see also Dept. of Human Services v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished332 Or. App. 765 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2024
Affirmed. 766 Brausen v. Brown LAGESEN, C. J. Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying post- conviction relief. … See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished333 Or. App. 297 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 20, 2024
Affirmed. 298 State v. Brown SHORR, P. J. … See State v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBegley v. Public Employes Retirement Board
26 Or. App. 869 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 20, 1976
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Public Employes’ Retirement Board denying him a disability retirement allowance as provided for in ORS 237.171. … The Board interpreted the statute to require membership in the system both at the date of injury and at the date of disability.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry
186 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 2003
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), 131 Or App 538 , 886 P2d 1033 (1994) (Boise II). … In Rogers v.
Cited 8 timesPublished331 Or. App. 624 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 2024
Relying on our decision in State v. … See Peeples v. 626 State v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBell v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
283 Or. App. 711 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2017
See State v. … State v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDesler v. LANE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
27 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 1976
In Green v. … Contrary to the thrust of petitioners’ second contention, there is evidence in the record supporting the board’s finding. Petitioners’ third contention relates to the adequacy of the board’s findings. In Kristensen v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedLewis-Taylor v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 2023
Like the petitioners in two other cases decided today, Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, ___ P3d ___ (2023), and Watson v. … The petitioner in Watson did not raise the issue to the board, but, relying on Tuckenberry v.
Cited 0 timesPublished40 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1902
Stitt, Patrick Murray, and Mose "Waller, respectively, are companion cases to Venable v.
Cited 0 timesPublished286 Or. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 7, 2017
to evaluate claimant’s condition in a manner that was contrary to our decision in Brown v. … Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 244 , 391 P3d 773 (2017) (Brown II).
Cited 6 timesPublished328 Or. App. 129 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 2023
Affirmed. 130 Dasher v. Brown LAGESEN, C. J. … See Aaron v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished325 Or. App. 403 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2023
Affirmed. 404 Brown v. Miller LAGESEN, C. J. … He argues that counsel “should have anticipated” the holding of Ramos, 590 US at ___, 140 S Ct at 1396, that the Sixth Amendment 406 Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBahrenfus v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
120 Or. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1993
Accident Prevention Div. v. Asana, 110 Or App 103, 107 , 821 P2d 432 (1991). … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618, 636 , 740 P2d 760 (1987) (Gillette, J., dissenting).
Cited 1 timesPublishedGilmore v. Board of Psychologist Examiners
81 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1986
Samuel v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 77 Or App 53, 59 , 712 P2d 132 (1985), rev den 300 Or 704 (1986). … She argues that, before the Board could discipline her, it was required to promulgate rules under the holdings of Trebesch v. Employment Division, 300 Or 264 , 710 P2d 136 (1985), and Megdal v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSingleton v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
262 Or. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 2014
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
Ask Donna