Case law

People v. Brown

26 N.Y.3d 1082 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 2016

People v. Brown

62 N.Y.2d 743 · New York Court of Appeals · May 10, 1984

Butler v. Brown

180 A.D.2d 406 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 4, 1992

Plaintiffs then instituted the instant malpractice action against defendant Brown. … Nor was it error to award prejudgment interest from September 1, 1986, the accrual of the malpractice action, pursuant to CPLR 5001 (a) (see, Spector v Mermelstein, 485 F2d 474 [2d Cir]; Quintel Corp. v Citibank, 606 F Supp

Brown v. Leach

189 A.D. 158 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 24, 1919

the first part, in writing, whether they elected to exercise the option which was thereby granted to them, to advance to the Island Oil and Transportation Corporation $1,000,000 in such amounts and at such times as the board … (May v. Hettrick Brothers Co., 181 App. Div. 3, 13 ; Stem v. Warren, 185 id. 823, 831.) It is my opinion that A. B.

People v. Brown

134 A.D.3d 637 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 29, 2015

People v. Brown

91 N.Y.2d 854 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1997

People v. Brown

233 A.D.2d 764 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 27, 1996

; People v Di Raffaele, 55 NY2d 234, 239 ; People v Rosado, 199 AD2d 833, 834-835 , lv denied 83 NY2d 876 ). … representation” (People v English, 215 AD2d 871, 873 , lv denied 86 NY2d 793 ; see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 ).

People v. Brown

129 A.D.3d 426 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 4, 2015

Brown v. Spohr

87 A.D. 522 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1903

(Martin v. Funk, 15 N. Y. 134 ; Matson v. Abbey, 70 Hun, 475 ; Greene v. Greene, 125 N. Y. 506 ; Young v. Young, 80 id. 422; Sullivan v. Sullivan, 161 id. 554.) … Brown (or before his decease should we in our discretion see fit so to do) to demand payment of said note or notes.”

Haight v. Brown

159 Misc. 652 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1936

(First Trust & Deposit Co. v. … (Gordon Corp. v. Cosman, 232 App. Div. 280 .) The amended answer does not raise a triable issue.

Brown v. Murphy

34 Misc. 2d 151 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1962

Thus, in Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals ( 270 U. … And in the recent case of Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners ( 353 U.

People v. Brown

129 A.D.3d 545 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 18, 2015

This evidence was relevant to the contested issue of intent (see People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 242 [1987]), and it tended to complete the narrative, explaining the events leading up to defendant’s arrest (see People v Morris … Moreover, the court expressly stated that, as fact-finder in this nonjury trial, it would not draw any inference of propensity, and the court is deemed capable of keeping that promise (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403 [1987

Brown v. . Wadsworth

168 N.Y. 225 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1901

S. 725, sec. 28; Vanderheyden v. Crandall, 2 Denio, 9 ; Striker v. Mott, 28 N. Y. 82 ; Smith v. Scholtz, 68 N. Y. 41 ; Schoonmaker v. Sheely, 3 Denio, 485 ; 4 Kent Com. 247, 256.) McWhorter v. … (Story’s Eq. sec. 1404; Howard v. Moffatt, 2 Johns. Ch. 206 ; Dumond v. Magee, 4 ib. 318; Kenny v. Udall, 5 ib. 464; Udall v. Kenney, 3 Cow. 590 ; Mumford v. Murray, 1 Paige, 620 .)

People v. Brown

251 A.D.2d 677 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1998

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the convictions is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 ; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 ). … In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

People v. Brown

90 A.D.3d 545 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 20, 2011

As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits (see United States v Cronic, 466 US 648 [1984]; Matter of Jeffrey V., 82 NY2d 121, 126 [1993]). … Brown, 17 NY3d 742, 743-744 [2011]).

People v. Brown

238 A.D.2d 204 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 17, 1997

v Rivera, 187 AD2d 258 ). … Rose, 202 AD2d 189 , lv denied 83 NY2d 876 ; see also, People v Cid, 216 AD2d 131 , lv denied 86 NY2d 872 ; People v Rivera, 213 AD2d 281 , lv denied 86 NY2d 740 ).

People v. Brown

221 A.D.2d 160 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 2, 1995

Defendant argues that the court violated his rights under People v Antommarchi ( 80 NY2d 247 ) by conducting voir dire of three prospective jurors in his absence. … The court is not required to explain all the contentions of the parties or outline all inconsistencies in the evidence (People v Saunders, 64 NY2d 665 ).

People v. Brown

173 A.D.2d 629 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 20, 1991

arresting officer would lead a reasonable person possessing the same expertise as the arresting officer to conclude that it is more probable than not that the suspect has committed or is committing a crime (see, People v … Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423 ; People v Carrasquillo, 54 NY2d 248, 254 ).

People v. Brown

281 A.D.2d 700 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 8, 2001

Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 ; People v Denis, supra, at 244 ). … 710.30 [3]; People v Banks, 77 AD2d 742, 743 ).

People v. Brown

122 A.D.2d 546 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 1986

Counsel’s failure to request a hearing without more does not constitute a basis for finding ineffectiveness (People v Eddy, 95 AD2d 956, 957 ). … Further, although defense counsel might have used different tactics and strategies on these issues, defendant was not denied meaningful representation (People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796 ).