Case law

Delehant v. Board on Police Standards & Training

317 Or. 273 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1993

Delehant v. Board on Police Standards, 115 Or App 598 , 839 P2d 737 (1992). We allowed review and now affirm. The pertinent facts are not in dispute. … See, e.g., Durfee v. Duke, 375 US 106, 109 , 84 S Ct 242 , 11 L Ed 2d 186 (1963); Riley v. New York Trust Co., 315 US 343, 348-49 , 62 S Ct 608 , 86 L Ed 885 (1942); Morphet v.

Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. State Land Board

211 Or. App. 251 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 2007

State v. … G.A.S.P. v.

Merrill v. Board of Architect Examiners

71 Or. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1985

The exact relationship between the School Board, Merrill, and Thaler and to each other is blurred. The School Board did not enter into a written contract with Merrill or Thaler. … determined by the board of not more than $1,000 for each offense.”

George v. State Board of Parole

93 Or. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 1988

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole setting his parole release date. … After the petition for judicial review was filed, the Board withdrew its order and issued one that eliminated a finding of aggravation under factor L.

Wilson v. Oregon Board of Parole

87 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1987

PER CURIAM Petitioner was convicted of several crimes committed in Multnomah County, and his sentences for those crimes include a 10-year minimum, which the Board of Parole (Board) sustained. … The Board enhanced that minimum by eight months, because of injury and threats of injury to the victims of the crimes.

Calderon-Pacheco v. State Board of Parole

309 Or. 454 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1990

The Board rejected the evidence on the basis that it was not “directly related to the circumstances surrounding the crime.” The Court of Appeals affirmed from the bench. Calderon-Pacheco v. … In support of this argument, the Board cites Anderson v. Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987), Evensizer v. Board of Parole, 301 Or 403 , 723 P2d 318 (1986), and Price v.

Moore v. Oregon State Board of Parole

54 Or. App. 369 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1981

OAR 255-35-010(2)(d); Harris v. Board of Parole, supra, 47 Or *374 App at 301. … We see no reason to allow the Board to enhance punishment for the two convictions when the trial court itself could not. See State v. Garcia, 288 Or 413 , 605 P2d 671 (1980); State v.

Citizens' Utility Board v. Public Utility Commission

154 Or. App. 702 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1998

As we noted in Steele v. … Co. v.

Mendacino v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

287 Or. App. 822 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 20, 2017

Peek v. … Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 200 , 335 P3d 828 (2014) (quoting Martin v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 147, 157 , 957 P2d 1210 (1998)).

Hill v. MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

12 Or. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1973

Archdiocese of Port. v. Co. of Wash., 254 Or 77, 86 , 458 P2d 682 (1969); Bissell v. Bd. of Wash. County Comrs., 12 Or App 174 , 506 P2d 499 (1973). … Archdiocese of Port. v. Co. of Wash., supra at 84-85. We note that there is an apparent discrepancy *250 between the conclusion we reach here and the language of Erickson v.

Sutton v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

74 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1985

PER CURIAM Petitioners seek judicial review of the Public Employes’ Retirement Board’s order on reconsideration, which cancelled their disability retirement allowances. ORS 237.195(1).

Stewart v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

125 Or. App. 576 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1993

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a February 24,1992, Psychiatric Security Review Board order denying him conditional release. We affirm. … See Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402 , 848 P2d 1194 (1993). We expressly do not decide petitioner’s claim that his condition does not constitute a mental disease. Affirmed.

Edney v. Columbia County Board of Commissioners

117 Or. App. 385 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 1992

See Baker v. City of Milwaukie, 271 Or 500 , 533 P2d 772 (1975). … See, e.g., *389 Campbell v. Bd. of Commissioners, 107 Or App 611 , 813 P2d 1074 (1991). We agree with defendants that the trial court lacked the authority to consider the merits of the case or to issue the writ.

Moats v. Board of Barbers & Hairdressers

100 Or. App. 653 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 1990

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Barbers and Hairdressers. The Board assessed a civil penalty against her for practicing manicure services without a license, in violation of ORS 690.015(1). … Petitioner argues, the state concedes, and we agree that the Board improperly increased the amount of the civil penalty from $300, which the hearings officer recommended, to $500.

Merrill v. Board of Architect Examiners

300 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1985

The State Board of Architect Examiners (BAE) fined petitioner $1,000 for unlicensed practice of architecture contrary to ORS 671.020. 1 The practice of architecture is defined to mean the “planning, designing or supervision … The arrangements between the school board, Merrill, and Thaler were oral and their relationships were “blurred,” but Merrill was not Thaler’s employe.

Caster v. State Board of Parole

58 Or. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 1982

However, the Board in its brief states: «* * * [Although] not raised by petitioner, it is * * * apparent that the Board has failed to schedule parole release ‘until a specified future date’ as required by ORS 144.125(3).” … Pursuant to this concession, the case is remanded to the Board to set a new release date.

Scherzinger v. Portland Custodians Civil Service Board

196 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 2004

See Shuler v. … .”); see also State v.

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry

186 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 2003

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry (A79626), 131 Or App 538 , 886 P2d 1033 (1994) (Boise II). … In Rogers v.

Brown & McCabe, Stevedores, Inc. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.

232 F. 298 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 11, 1915

Brown v. Highberger

332 Or. App. 767 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2024

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STEPHEN LEE BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Affirmed. 768 Brown v. Highberger LAGESEN, C. J. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying habeas corpus relief.