Opinion

Sutton v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

  • 74 Or. App. 621
  • 702 P.2d 1171
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Jul 31, 1985
Status
Published
On the bench
Newman, Richardson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioners seek judicial review of the Public Employes’ Retirement Board’s order on reconsideration, which cancelled their disability retirement allowances. ORS 237.195(1).

Petitioners argue at length about the meaning of the disability retirement allowance statutes, ORS 237.171 et seq. However, under the express findings PERB made, the cancellation of petitioners’ allowances is required by the statutes even as petitioners argue they should be interpreted. They do not challenge the findings.

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.