Case law

De Laittre v. Board of Com'rs

149 F. 800 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Jan 14, 1907

See Robertson v. State Land Board, 42 Or. 183 , 70 Pac. 614 , Miller v. Wattier, 44 Or. 347 , 75 Pac. 209 , and Robertson v. Low, 44 Or. 587 , 77 Pac. 744 . … in the case of Parsons v.

Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

356 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2014

In Dawson v. … Similarly, in Baker v.

Smith v. Oregon Board of Parole

143 Or. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 11, 1996

Defendant is correct that, before passage of the current version of ORS 144.335, habeas corpus was not an available remedy for one who failed to seek judicial review of a Board of Parole order. Billings v. … Meadows v. Schiedler, 143 Or App 213 , 924 P2d 314 (1996).

Sostillio v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 2000

FILED: January 27, 2000 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON PETER JAY SOSTILLIO, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review. … See Quintero v. Board of Parole , 329 Or 319 , 986 P2d 575 (1999). * Judicial review from the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision. 147 Or App 730 , 939 P2d 172 (1997).

Anderson v. Public Employes Retirement Board

134 Or. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 1995

According to one school board member, when some of the members of the board expressed concern about the amount of salary in relation to the employment hours, Anderson said that the board was “not to worry,” as the hours “ … See Rectenwald v. Snider, 134 Or App 250 , 894 P2d 1242 (1995); Mobley v. Manheim Services Corp., 133 Or App 89 , 889 P2d 1342 , rev den 321 Or 47 (1995); Hussey v. Huntsinger, 72 Or App 565 , 696 P2d 580 (1985).

Patton v. State Board of Higher Education

59 Or. App. 477 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1982

Marbet v. Portland Gen. Elect., 277 Or 447, 456 , 561 P2d 154 (1977).

Clark v. Jackson County

313 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1994

ORS 197.835 provides in relevant part: “ (7) In addition * * * the board shall reverse or remand the land use decision under review if the board finds: “(a) The local government or special district: *514 «c* * * * * “(C) … See Yamhill County v. Ludwick, 294 Or 778, 789 , 663 P2d 398 (1983) (applying principle); West Hills & Island Neighbors v.

Campbell v. Board of Medical Examiners

21 Or. App. 368 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1975

We hold that under the facts presented here the Board was not required to start from the beginning, i.e., file a new complaint, issue and serve a new notice, and conduct a second de novo hearing. Labor Board v. … West v. City of Astoria, 18 Or App 212, 219 , 524 P2d 1216 (1974); Campbell v. Bd. of Medical Exam., supra, 16 Or App at 386-87 ; The Grog House v. OLCC, 12 Or App 426 , 507 P2d 419 (1973).

Moore v. Oregon State Board of Parole

54 Or. App. 369 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1981

OAR 255-35-010(2)(d); Harris v. Board of Parole, supra, 47 Or *374 App at 301. … We see no reason to allow the Board to enhance punishment for the two convictions when the trial court itself could not. See State v. Garcia, 288 Or 413 , 605 P2d 671 (1980); State v.

Hill v. MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

12 Or. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1973

Archdiocese of Port. v. Co. of Wash., 254 Or 77, 86 , 458 P2d 682 (1969); Bissell v. Bd. of Wash. County Comrs., 12 Or App 174 , 506 P2d 499 (1973). … Archdiocese of Port. v. Co. of Wash., supra at 84-85. We note that there is an apparent discrepancy *250 between the conclusion we reach here and the language of Erickson v.

Morrison v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

277 Or. App. 861 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 2016

Smith v. … of incarceration was speculative); Garner v.

Sutton v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

74 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1985

PER CURIAM Petitioners seek judicial review of the Public Employes’ Retirement Board’s order on reconsideration, which cancelled their disability retirement allowances. ORS 237.195(1).

Hodgin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

127 Or. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1994

Martin v. PSRB, 312 Or 157 ; 167, 818 P2d 1264 (1991). … Cook v. PSRB, supra, 123 Or App at 535 ; Hodgin v. PSRB, 113 Or App 580, 583-84 , 833 P2d 351 (1992).

Hoffman v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

31 Or. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 4, 1977

In Floersheim v. … No. 1 Reformed v.

City of Hermiston v. Employment Relations Board

27 Or. App. 755 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 1976

Under State ex rel Heinig v. Milwaukie et al, supra, and Branch v. Albee, 71 Or 188 , 142 P 598 (1914), both discussed at length in Beaverton v. F. A. Fire Fighters, supra, our answer is in the negative. … Assn v. Sch. Dist., 24 Or App 751 , 547 P2d 647 , modified 25 Or App 407 , 549 P2d 1141 , Sup Ct review denied (1976); Sutherlin Ed. Assn v. Sch.

Nickila v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

124 Or. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

In his first assignment, petitioner argues that the activities found by the Board do not come within the statutory definition of “chiropractic” in ORS 684.010(2), and that the Board exceeded its authority by interpreting … See Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980).

Strecker v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

320 Or. 491 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1994

Benton v. State Board of Parole

95 Or. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 1989

On January 28, 1986, the Board set a new parole release date for petitioner. … The Board hearings officer determined that he had not knowingly violated the conditions of parole and reinstated the one-year supervised parole condition.

Graham v. Oregon Board of Parole

86 Or. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 1987

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole setting his parole release date. … He contends, inter alia, that the board erred in denying him the opportunity to present evidence of mitigating factors respecting his parole release date. The Board concedes that it erred. We agree.

Cooper v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

31 Or. App. 1329 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1977

There is nothing in the record to indicate that this was the basis for the Board’s decision. … The dismissal of James Cooper as a permanent teacher at Banks School District No. 13 was made in accordance with the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board.’ ” *[1332] The superintendent’s recommendation referred to by the Board was