Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,550 results
1.92s
Kimberly B. Scott v. Fall Line Condominium Association
2019 ME 50 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 2019
Burdzel v. Sobus, 2000 ME 84, ¶ 6, 750 A.2d 573. … Farrington’s Owners’ Ass’n v.
Cited 21 timesPublished17 Me. 391 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1840
Marshall v. Fiske, 6 Mass. R. 31 . This title may be defeated by a subsequent conveyance first recorded. But to have this effect the record should be first, not simultaneous. … Justice Jackson, in delivering the opinion of the Court, in the case of State of Connecticut v. Bradish, 14 Mass.
Cited 3 timesPublished394 A.2d 798 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 4, 1978
In Brown v. … Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at 603 , 95 S.Ct. at 2261 . See United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268 , 98 S.Ct. 1054 , 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978). The Court addressed this point in Michigan v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedShackford & Gooch, Inc. v. B & B Coastal Enterprises, Inc.
479 A.2d 1312 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 15, 1984
Brown, Jr., subject to Gooch’s right-of-way. Brown received title to an adjacent tract from Shackford’s widow. On March 25, 1976, Brown conveyed the back portion of this property to his wife, Elizabeth. … McCausland v. York, 133 Me. 115, 121 , 174 A. 383, 386 (1934); Loomis v. Pingree, 43 Me. 299, 308 (1857).
Cited 2 timesPublished927 A.2d 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2007
Griswold v. … See Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedThe Witham Family Limited Partnership v. Town of Bar Harbor
110 A.3d 642 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 2015
P’ship v. Town of Bar Harbor, 2011 ME 104, ¶¶ 1-2, 30 A.3d 811. The Planning Board denied the application, finding that the hotel would exceed the Bar Harbor Land Use Ordinance’s height requirements. … Lewiston Daily Sun v. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 43, 1999 ME 143, ¶ 12, 738 A.2d 1239.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDufault v. Midland-Ross of Canada, Ltd.
380 A.2d 200 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 7, 1977
Mullen v. Brown Homes, Inc., Me., 358 A.2d 557 (1976). The commission’s approval is, however, of decidedly limited import. The parties do thereby become bound by an enforceable decree. … In Waltz v.
Cited 37 timesPublished571 A.2d 1181 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1990
State v. … Gary, the boat’s owner, cooperated with the Warden’s request to check “fish and gear” by boarding the boat with him and producing the cooler containing their “legal limit.” United States v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedChapin v. Maine Central Railroad
97 Me. 151 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1902
State v. Wilson, 42 Maine, 9; Bangor House v. Brown, 33 Maine, 309. … Kean v. Stetson, 5 Pick. 492 : State v. Wilson, 42 Maine, 9.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatheson v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF CITY OF SACO
387 A.2d 218 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1978
On January 28, 1976, defendant Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Saco denied an application filed by plaintiff Ralph Matheson, on behalf of the Lawrence 0. … The Board granted the application, adding the specification that Section 608 of the Zoning Ordinance would control the size of the proposed sign in front of the building.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated January 30, 1986
638 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 19, 1986
As the dissent in In re Grand Jury Matter (Brown), supra, pointed out, the Supreme Court applied the collective entity rule of Wilson v. … See United States v. Layton, 90 F.R.D. 520, 526 (N.D.Cal.1981); Garrity v. Thomson, 81 F.R.D. 633, 636 (D.N.H.1979); Lora v. Board of Education, 74 F.R.D. 565, 576-77 (E.D.N.Y.1977). 6 .
Cited 4 timesPublished837 A.2d 148 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 26, 2003
Rockport Subdivision Ordinance § V, Rockport Land Use Ordinance §§ 703.3, 703.4. See also Lewis v. … In Chapel Road Associates v.
Cited 55 timesPublishedLane Construction Corp. v. Town of Washington
942 A.2d 1202 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 2008
v. … Co. v.
Cited 25 timesPublished32 A.3d 1048 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 22, 2011
Barnett, 2011 ME 21, ¶ 6 , 13 A.3d 784 (quoting Rudolph v. Golick, 2010 ME 106, ¶¶ 8-9 , 8 A.3d 684 ); Jordan v. City of Ellsworth, 2003 ME 82, ¶ 9 , 828 A.2d 768 . … See Fitanides v.
Cited 45 timesPublishedMarc B. Terfloth v. Town of Scarborough
90 A.3d 1131 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 8, 2014
See, e.g., Donlon v. … .”); Plaza Hotel Assoc. v.
Cited 17 timesPublished119 Me. 264 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 9, 1920
Bourne v. Ward, 51 Maine, 191; Small v. Clewley, 62 Maine, 156; Morrison v. Brown, 84 Maine, 82; Palmer v. Palmer, 112 Maine, 149; Palmer v. Blanchard, 113 Maine, 380. But defendant offered evidence tending otherwise. … Bank v. Curtis, 167 N. Y., 194 . A note upon consideration payee would provide maker a home as long as he lived was held valid, notwithstanding that the maker also paid a weekly sum for board.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWitham v. Board of Trustees for the Maine Criminal Justice Academy
Superior Court of Maine · May 24, 2021
Witham argues that the "legal counsel" who advised the Board was also the same attorney prosecuting the case before the Board which created an appearance of "confirmation bias." (Pet'r's Br. 15 (citing Howitt v. … Cf Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished42 Me. 384 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856
State v. Sutton, 4 Grill. 494. In Kirk v. … State v. Coleman, 3 Ala. 14 ; Aubens v. State, 6 Ala. 20 ; Swinney v. State, 8 G. & M. 576.
Cited 8 timesPublished707 A.2d 79 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 18, 1998
State v. Preble, 430 A.2d 553, 555 (Me.1981) (quoting United States v. Viegas, 639 F.2d 42, 44 (1st Cir.1981)); see United States v. … See id. at 237-38 (citing Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct, 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (“probable cause is a flexible, common-sense standard ...
Cited 19 timesPublished2008 Me. 44 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 2008
Yates v. Town of Southwest Harbor, 2001 ME 2, ¶ 10 , 763 A.2d 1168, 1171 . A court will not substitute its judgment for that of a board. Greenberg v. DiBiase, 637 A.2d 1177, 1178 (Me.1994). … Boards have inherent authority to revisit their own decisions. Cardinali v. Town of Berwick, 550 A.2d 921, 921 (Me.1988).
Cited 31 timesPublished
Ask Donna