Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.39s
Brown v. Far West Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
66 Or. App. 387 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 11, 1984
Inside plaintiffs brown paper sack, police found a can of pop. Plaintiff subsequently filed this lawsuit. … In Delp v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedStrecker v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
116 Or. App. 553 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 25, 1992
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) that denied his request for a discharge and continued his commitment. We reverse and remand. … PSRB contends, relying on Baldwin v. PSRB, 97 Or App 367 , 776 P2d 577 (1989), that petitioner still suffers from the personality disorder that caused him to be dangerous.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDulcich, Inc. v. Mayer Brown, LLP
954 F. Supp. 2d 1129 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2013
Within a month, on July 18, 2012, Mayer Brown filed a complaint in the Superior Court in the District of Columbia, alleging breach of contract. Mayer Brown LLP v. … Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBissell v. Board of County Commissioners
12 Or. App. 174 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1973
See Lindley v. City of Klamath Falls, 8 Or App 375 , 494 P2d 464 (1972). … Archdiocese of Port. v. Co. of Wash., 254 Or 77 , 458 P2d 682 (1969); Rust v. City of Eugene, 3 Or App 386 , 474 P2d 374 (1970). .
Cited 1 timesPublishedFuller v. BOARD OF TAX PRACTITIONERS
343 Or. 223 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2007
168 P.3d 1154 (2007) FULLER v. BOARD OF TAX PRACTITIONERS No. S55197. Supreme Court of Oregon. October 4, 2007. Petition for review denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished342 Or. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 6, 2025
Hannah Brown argued the cause and filed the brief pro se. Before Aoyagi, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. EGAN, J. Reversed and remanded. 516 Brown v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAdams v. Public Employees Retirement Board
180 Or. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 2002
of Springfield Education Assoc. v. … Knapp v. City of North Bend, 304 Or 34, 41 , 741 P2d 505 (1987).
Cited 5 timesPublishedWilkinson v. Public Employees Retirement Board
188 Or. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 2003
State ex rel SOSCF v. Dennis, 173 Or App 604, 611 , 25 P3d 341 , rev den, 332 Or 558 (2001) (citing Dept. of Transportation v. Hewett Professional Group, 321 Or 118, 126 , 895 P2d 755 (1995)). … Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc., 295 Or 679, 697 , 669 P2d 1132 (1983).
Cited 3 timesPublished342 Or. App. 335 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 30, 2025
Affirmed. 336 Brown v. Miller AOYAGI, P. J. … Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 28, 581 P2d 934 (1978).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJustice Resource Center v. Board of Parole
338 Or. App. 509 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 12, 2025
Maloney v. … Board of Parole rule that, according to the Parole Board Chair, was currently binding on the Parole Board. See PNW Metal Recycling, Inc. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOsborn v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
171 Or. App. 248 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2000
Norden v. Water Resources Dept., 329 Or 641, 647-48 , 996 P2d 958 (2000); Younger v. City of Portland, 305 Or 346, 356 , 752 P2d 262 (1988). … functioning is a V code).
Cited 3 timesPublished347 Or. App. 129 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2026
PER CURIAM Affirmed. 130 Molina v. Brown PER CURIAM Petitioner appeals a judgment denying post- conviction relief. … The post-conviction court did not err in concluding on this record that petitioner failed to prove constitutionally 132 Molina v. Brown inadequate or ineffective assistance.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedJensen v. Board of Dental Examiners
53 Or. App. 50 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1981
We remand this matter back to the Board for reconsideration of the sanctions to be imposed in light of our holding that petitioner is guilty of only two violations. See Palen v. State Bd. … It arises from the Board’s failure to give reasons for the sanctions imposed. Petitioner concedes that this question was determined by Mary’s Fine Foods, Inc. v. OLCC, 30 Or App 435 , 567 P2d 146 , rev den (1977).
Cited 3 timesPublishedHarral v. Board of Boiler Rules
221 Or. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 6, 2008
App. 507 HARRAL v. BOARD OF BOILER RULES. No. A135241. Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 6, 2008. Affirmed without opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Gold Beach Dairy Queen
109 Or. App. 509 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1991
Claimant argues that the Board erred in that it did not provide an ordered set of findings, and a reasoned explanation of why her disabling pain causes only a 10 percent loss of *512 use and function. See Matthies v. … The Board concluded that his inability to perform such tasks constituted an impairment of 10 percent. 41 Van Natta 752.
Cited 0 timesPublished346 Or. App. 68 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2025
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STEPHEN LEE BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Brown v. Miller, 336 Or App 460 (2024) (nonprecedential memorandum decision).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished346 Or. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2025
Nichole BROWN, Superintendent, Coffee Creek Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. … Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US 83, 93, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTilden v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
135 Or. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 1995
Without an adequate explanation by the Board as to its reasoning, we conclude that a meaningful review under ORS 183.482(8) is impossible. Stalder v. Bd. of Medical Examiners, 37 Or App 853, 859 , 588 P2d 659 (1978). … See Reynolds School District No. 7 v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDavis v. Board of Architect Examiners
222 Or. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 24, 2008
The board found the following facts, which, because they are uncontested on judicial review, we adopt. Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 322 Or 132, 134 , 903 P2d 351 (1995). … See Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217, 223 , 621 P2d 547 (1980) (summarizing the categorization of statutory terms).
Cited 1 timesPublishedRomanov v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
179 Or. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 2002
The question whether the Board had the authority to extend its jurisdiction over petitioner turns on whether the legislature granted the Board that authority. As we explained in Gaynor v. … The Board argues, however, that Strecker v. PSRB, 154 Or App 130 , 960 P2d 893 , rev den 328 Or 41 (1998), supports its claim that ORS 161.327(1) authorized the Board to extend its jurisdiction over petitioner.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna