Case law

Kathleen Bryant v. Town of Wiscasset

176 A.3d 176 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 2017

See Mills v. … Bizier v.

Osprey Family Trust v. Town of Owls Head

141 A.3d 1114 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 7, 2016

OSPREY FAMILY TRUST v. TOWN OF OWLS HEAD et al. MEAD, J. [¶1] The Osprey Family Trust appeals, pursuant to M.R. Civ. … See Fitanides v.

MSR Recycling, LLC v. Weeks & Hutchins, LLC

2019 ME 125 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 1, 2019

See Pawlendzio v. … See Yates v.

Seekins v. Lougee

152 Me. 153 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 17, 1956

Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Me. 450 at Page 455. … Dewey, J., in Crafts v.

Rudolph v. Golick

8 A.3d 684 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 26, 2010

Jordan v. … Borrelli v.

Smith v. State

588 A.2d 305 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 27, 1991

State v. Tomah, 560 A.2d 575, 575 (Me.1989); see also Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 , 95 S.Ct. 2525, 2541 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Adams v. United States ex rel. … See Brown v. Wainwright, 665 F.2d 607, 611 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. Bennett, 539 F.2d 45, 51 (10th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 925 , 97 S.Ct. 327 , 50 L.Ed.2d 293 (1976); United States v.

Robert Duffy v. Town of Berwick

82 A.3d 148 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 2013

See Pelkey v. … Bushey v.

Hughes Bros., Inc. v. Town of Eddington

130 A.3d 978 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 14, 2016

Co. v. … See Vella v.

National Organization for Marriage v. Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices

66 A.3d 579 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 30, 2013

v. … See Hammer v. Sec’y of State, 2010 ME 109, ¶ 4, 8 A.3d 700; see also Citizens United v. Fed.

City of Bangor v. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees, Council 74

449 A.2d 1129 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 8, 1982

Baker Bus Service v. … V.

Chapin v. Maine Central Railroad

97 Me. 151 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1902

State v. Wilson, 42 Maine, 9; Bangor House v. Brown, 33 Maine, 309. … Kean v. Stetson, 5 Pick. 492 : State v. Wilson, 42 Maine, 9.

Franklin Bank v. Steward

37 Me. 519 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1853

Their general management is committed to a board of directors, who are the general agents of their respective banks, and who appoint their cashiers. … Haven v. Brown, 1 Greenl. 421; Gooch v. Bryant, 13 Maine, 386; Maine Bank v. Smith, 18 Maine, 99.

Rogers v. Dexter & Piscataquis Railroad

85 Me. 372 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1893

The defendant railroad company contracted with Brown Brothers & Company for the entire construction of its railroad. … Aiken v. Wasson, 24 N. Y. 482 ; Batch v. R. R. Co. 46 N. Y. 521 ; Vane v. Newcombe, 132 U. S. 220; Weymouth v. Sanborn, 43 N. H. 171. Also in the China Treaty, In Re Ho King, 14 Fed. Rep. 724.

Anderson v. Maine Public Employees Retirement System

985 A.2d 501 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 29, 2009

Kelley v. Me. Pub. Employees Ret. Sys., 2009 ME 27, ¶ 16 , 967 A.2d 676, 682 ; York Ins. of Me., Inc. v. … See Young v. Bd. of Trs. of Me. State Ret.

State v. Prudenzano

365 A.2d 418 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 26, 1976

The defendant argues that, even assuming the jury did not accept the alibi evidence, there was no evidence linking the brown paper bag which the defendant was seen carrying, with the brown paper bag containing coins later … As we said in State v.

The Witham Family Limited Partnership v. Town of Bar Harbor

110 A.3d 642 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 5, 2015

P’ship v. Town of Bar Harbor, 2011 ME 104, ¶¶ 1-2, 30 A.3d 811. The Planning Board denied the application, finding that the hotel would exceed the Bar Harbor Land Use Ordinance’s height requirements. … Lewiston Daily Sun v. Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 43, 1999 ME 143, ¶ 12, 738 A.2d 1239.

In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum Dated January 30, 1986

638 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 19, 1986

As the dissent in In re Grand Jury Matter (Brown), supra, pointed out, the Supreme Court applied the collective entity rule of Wilson v. … See United States v. Layton, 90 F.R.D. 520, 526 (N.D.Cal.1981); Garrity v. Thomson, 81 F.R.D. 633, 636 (D.N.H.1979); Lora v. Board of Education, 74 F.R.D. 565, 576-77 (E.D.N.Y.1977). 6 .

State v. Sherburne

571 A.2d 1181 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 2, 1990

State v. … Gary, the boat’s owner, cooperated with the Warden’s request to check “fish and gear” by boarding the boat with him and producing the cooler containing their “legal limit.” United States v.

French v. Chase

6 Me. 166 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1829

The plaintiffs claim title to the goods in question under a sale of them by Walter Brown. … The principle above stated is distinctly maintained by the decision in Bartels v. Harris, 4 Greenl. 146, and How v. Ward, ib. 195.

Kimberly LaMarre v. Town of China

259 A.3d 764 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 16, 2021

. [¶4] If the scope of the Board’s review is de novo, we review the Board’s decision on appeal; if, however, the scope of the Board’s review is appellate, we review the CEO’s decision directly. See Mills v. … See Town of Ogunquit v.