Case law

Brown v. Brown

22 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 410 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Oct 15, 1919

In Linton v. … J., Duffield v. Duffield, 1 Dow. & Cl. 311.)” In Hamilton v.

Brown v. Lyons

43 Ohio Misc. 14 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Nov 12, 1974

Brown v. Bahrick

71 Ohio Law. Abs. 529 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Sep 24, 1954

White v. Calhoun et al, 83 Oh St 401. No such showing appears on the face of the pleadings, and the Court should not make such an order on mere assertions of counsel. … J., p, 407, in delivering the opinion of the court in the case of White v. Calhoun, et al, supra.

Commissioners v. Brown

26 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 377 · Belmont County Courts, Ohio · May 3, 1916

Brown. … Brown had a right to recover even if her injury was the result of the combined negligence of both the board of county commissioners and the driver of the automobile.

Brown v. State

2 Ohio C.C. 129 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 15, 1887

In Van Buskirk v. … Following Stanley v. State, 23 Ohio St., 581 ; and Farris v. State, 1 Ohio St., 188 . In Jennings v.

Brown v. Ginn

19 Ohio C.C. 660 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

In this case Brown averred in his answer that the claim ued upon by the trustee had been paid in money. … It is ■ laimed here that Brown under hits answer was entitled to show payment in any method, and the court erred in confining him to showing payment by money only.

Brown v. State

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 93 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Apr 30, 1910

Brown v. Parham

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 602 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 16, 1903

When the case of Wentzel v. Hayes et al, 16 C. C., 110, was decided, Section 5441, Revised Statutes, as 'amended in 81 O.

Brown v. Harshman

9 Ohio C.C. 1 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1894

Card’s Adm’r, 2 Ohio St. 450 ; Bigelow v. Bigelow, 4 Ohio, 138, and Martin’s Adm’r v. Train’s Ex’r, 6 O. C. C. R. 49. … See also Garber v. The Commonwealth, 7 Pa. St. 265; Harker v. Irick, 2 Stock. Chy. 269. Such a construction would be both unreasonable and unjust. Barcus v. Stover, supra.

Brown v. Miller

25 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 470 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jan 30, 1925

See, Roberts v. Remy et al., 56 O. S., 249. G-. C. … See also —Perry v. Richardson, 27 O. S., 110.

Reed v. Brown

10 Ohio C.C. 44 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Nov 15, 1894

Brown, as executor under the last will and testament of Robert Brown, deceased, late of Hartland, in the county of Huron and state of Ohio, which will was duly proved and admitted to probate by the probate court for said … Brown is one of the sureties on the bond of said executor.”

Watson v. Brown

8 Ohio N.P. 330 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jul 1, 1901

Brown v. Ricketts

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 269 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 20, 1905

Brown, he rendered professional services to Frank Brown, a son of the defendant, and that the fair value of such services is $780. … V. & T. Ry. v. Gaffney, 65 Ohio St. 104 [61 N. E.

Alexander v. Brown

2 Disney (Ohio) 395 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Nov 15, 1858

Caldwell v. Brown

9 Ohio C.C. 691 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1895

The action was first brought before a justice of the peace, Judgment was recovered by Brown, from which Caldwell appealed. … This section was under consideration by this court at the last term of this court, in the case of Foy v, The Toledo Consolidated Street Ry.

Brown v. Dusha

20 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 310 · Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Lucas County · Jan 11, 1913

Co. v. Snyder, 55 Ohio St., 342 . … Co. v. Cox, Admr., 66 Ohio St., 276 .

Brown v. John

18 Ohio C.C. 736 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1894

Brown being the wife of Jeremiah Brown) for the foreclosure of the mortgage above mentioned. … It may not be material ini the case of Baldwin v. Sheets, supra. Our conclusion is that the judgment should be affirmed.

Leverone v. Brown

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 722 · Ohio Circuit Courts · May 8, 1909

We do not think the holding of this court in Swing v. Crane, 32 O. C. C. 000 (11 N. … In Swing v. Crane, supra, one of the defenses was the statute of limitations.

Friedlander v. Brown

29 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 586 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Sep 27, 1932

Brown named in the other causes of action. On June 28, 1931, service by publication based on a defective affidavit was set aside and held for naught. … Brown and others by publication.

West v. Brown

1 Disney (Ohio) 48 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jun 15, 1855

The payee indorsed the note to Brown, the defendant in error. On the day the note became due, February 23,1855, it was handed to a notary, who was examined as a witness, on the trial, at special term. … S. 215, Lawson et al v. Farmer’s Bank of Salem.