Opinion

Watson v. Brown

  • 8 Ohio N.P. 330
Court
Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati
Filed
Jul 1, 1901
Status
Published
Author
Dempsey
On the bench
Dempsey
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Dempsey, J.

The petition does separately state and number two causes o.f action, but defendant contends that the first cause of action as set out is-in realitv two causes of action and should be-stated and numbered as such. But this is not so. The first count in the petition is, in reality what is known as a partnership bill — an equitable remedy whereby, either before or after dissolution, a partner may procure protection of the partnership property, an account, and a distribution of its assets. These forms of *331 relief are just what plaintiff seeks in his count.

A. W. Goldsmith for motion; John Weld, contra.

The making of the Casualty Company a party to this count and asking an injunction against it does not alter the case any, as the injunction here is but incidental to the main relief, and in line with the main object of the action, viz., the distribution of the alleged partnership assets.

Motion overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.