Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

1.20s

  • Board of Mgrs. of Liberty Terrace Condominium v. Little

    2024 NY Slip Op 33593(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Oct 7, 2024

    Board of Mgrs. of Liberty Terrace Condominium v Little 2024 NY Slip Op 33593(U) October 7, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: … “The standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some firsthand confirmation of the facts” (Feffer v Malpeso, 210 AD2d 60, 61 [1st Dept 1994]).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bergnes v. Bergnes

    24 Fla. Supp. 2d 41 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Jan 20, 1987

    See, e.g., Brown v. … See generally Herald Publishing Co. v. Florida Antennavision, Inc., 173 So.2d 469 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965); State v. Dwyer, 332 So.2d 333 (Fla. 1976); Board of County Com’rs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Union Free School v. Incorporated Village of North Hills

    67 Misc. 2d 264 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1971

    The adversaries are a Board of Education and a Village Board of Trustees and Mayor. … An article 78 proceeding may not be used to review the refusal to perform such an act or to enforce performance of it (Matter of Walsh v. La Guardia, 269 N. Y. 437 ; Matter of International Ry. Co. v. Schwab, 203 App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rorke v. Russell

    2 Lans. 242 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1869

    None of the members or officers of the board, except Russell, the president, and the plaintiff, may have been parties to the action, and that may have been, or may be a good reason, why the injunction should not have issued … against the other officers and members of the board, or why it should, or might have been vacated on motion, by or in behalf of such other .officers or members, or any, or either of them; but this furnishes no excuse for

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lamar Advertising of Penn LLC v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Township of Richmond

    65 Pa. D. & C.4th 43 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Dec 17, 2003

    Center City Residents Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 48 Pa. Commw. 416 , 410 A.2d 374 (1980). … Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. Commw. 550 , 462 A.2d 637 (1983); Teazers Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adjustment, 682 A.2d 856 (Pa. Commw. 1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State of Maine, Dep't of Human Servs.

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 12, 2001

    BROWN, III, Petitioner Vv. … In arguing that the hearing officer was correct, the Department points to two cases from other jurisdictions, Smith v. Smith, 651 P.2d 1290 (Az. App. 1982) and Hinckley v. Hinckley, 812 P.2d 907 (Wyo. 1991).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Schulten v. Lord

    4 E.D. Smith 206 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1855

    (Havens v. Hussey, 5 Paige, 30 ; Fisher v. Murray, 1 E. D. Smith, 341.) … In the Tradesmen's Bank v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aquafortis Associates, LLC v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 28, 2020

    AQF timely appealed the transfer to the Maine Board of Environmental Protection ("BEP"). … or commissioner or to otherwise violate the terms of the order of the board or commissioner

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Albert M. Greenfield & Co. v. Asset-Interest B. & L. Ass'n

    14 Pa. D. & C. 567 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 9, 1931

    ; that, in the then condition of its affairs, the actual value of the plaintiff’s stock, as shown by an appraisement by expert appraisers, was $725; that there were eighty-two applications for withdrawal received by the board … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adee v. Demorest & Simons

    54 Barb. 433 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1867

    of Hollister, the shipper, at or before the time of the shipment of such oáts, and he produced the shipping bill of said oats, signed by the said warehouseman and shipper, showing the shipment of this quantity of oats on board … (Brown v. Hodgson, 2 Camp. 36. Stanton v. Eager, 16 Pick. 467 .) [Monroe General Term, September 2, 1867. I do not see, therefore, how the referee could have found title in the defendants to the oats in question.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morse v. Williamson

    35 Barb. 472 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1861

    By the Court, Brown, J. … (Embury v. Conner, 3 Comst. 511.) See also Stafford v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Houston v. Tri-State Machinery

    2 Pa. D. & C.3d 796 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Jul 7, 1977

    Defendant refers the court to Ferraro v. Ford Motor Co., 423 Pa. 324 , 223 A.2d 746 (1966), in support of its contention that it was entitled to a charge on assumption of the risk. … See, Rhoads v. Service Machine Co., 329 F.Supp. 367 (E.D. Ark. 1971); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kimball v. Blaisdell

    5 N.H. 533 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Nov 15, 1831

    Rep. 170 , Scoby v. Blanchard; 4 ditto, 397, Pritchard v. Brown. … Stevens; 13 ditto, 316, Same v. Same ; 1 Johns. Cases, 81, Jackson v. Bull; Plowden, 434 ; 9 Cranch, 53 ; Co. Litt. 47, b, and 265, a ; 3 Pick. 52 , Somes v. Skinner; 13 Johns. 201 , Jackson v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Brockway

    1 Mich. N.P. 57 · Circuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan · Nov 15, 1869

    *58 By the- Court, Brown, J. … The law of 1859 prescribes the duties oi the Board of Registration.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • EMAC, L.L.C. v. Hanover County

    89 Va. Cir. 292 · Hanover County Circuit Court · Nov 12, 2014

    City Council of Virginia Beach v. … Harrell, 236 Va. at 102 ; see also Board of Supervisors v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brennan v. Barnes

    133 Misc. 340 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1928

    (Litchfield v. Flint, 104 N. Y. 543 ; First National Bank v. Shuler, 153 id. 163, 173; United Press v. Abell Co., 73 App. Div. 240 .) … (Wilson v. Brown, 107 Misc. 167 .) The direct wrong was done to the corporation. (Rich v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 87 N. Y. 382, 398 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State of Maine, Dep't of Human Servs.

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 30, 2000

    AP-00-20 DM REV ~ 6/80/2020 JAMES BROWN, Petitioner v. . DECISION AND ORDER STATE OF MAINE, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Pode Respondent... … Brown relies on Wood v. Wood, 407 A.2d 282, 287 (Me. 1979) for the proposition that the common law allows exceptions to this general rule against retroactive modification of support orders.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Scott v. Commonwealth

    36 Pa. D. & C. 366 · Montgomery County Court of Quarter Sessions · Oct 31, 1939

    The Commonwealth has the power to appropriate property directly by statute: Smedley v. Irwin et al., 51 Pa. 445 (1866). … Francis Shunk Brown, then Attorney General of the Commonwealth, at page 723, stated: “The power of the Commissioners is limited to designating and marking the boundaries of the land deemed expedient by them to be acquired

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Calderon v. Russi

    150 Misc. 2d 708 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1991

    Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 NY2d 391 [1987]). There are two issues put to this court by Calderon. The first involves the jurisdiction of the Division of Parole and the second involves due process. … Sav. & Loan Assn. v Guerra ( 479 US 272 [1987]).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vito v. Garfield Heights City

    94 Ohio Law. Abs. 21 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Jun 12, 1962

    Kling, v. … In Brown v. Village of Milford et al, 8 O. N. P. (N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.