Case law

State ex rel. Ernst v. Brunner

145 Ohio Misc. 2d 73 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Oct 30, 2007

The Relief Sought {¶ 10} The candidates have no right to appeal the secretary’s decision breaking the tie vote of the Highland County Board of Elections. State ex rel. The Limited, Inc. v. Franklin Cty. … See Storer v. Brown (1974), 415 U.S. 724, 735 [ 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 ].” Id. at *8.

Martin v. Bigelow

36 Misc. 298 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1901

Pirie v. Chicago T. & T. Co., 182 U. S. 438 . … Duncan v. Landis, 5 Am. Bank. Rep. 649-674.

Spitzer v. Village of Fulton

33 Misc. 257 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1900

It may enact that the electors of a village may determine what parts of the General Village Law shall apply to their village (Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 N. … Scott v. Twombly, 20 Misc. Rep. 652 . The act is constitutional. Bank of Rome v. Village of Rome, 18 N. Y. 38 ; Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 id. 467; Smith v. Proctor, 130 id. 319.

Bethlehem Poster Advertising & Sign Corp. v. City of Bethlehem

2 Pa. D. & C. 307 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County · Feb 13, 1922

Justice Brown places the decision in that ease upon the following quotation from Crawford v. … In Com. v.

King v. Power Authority

76 Misc. 2d 725 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1973

(Litchfield v. Bond, supra, p. 78 ).” (New York State Environmental Facilities Corp. v. Young, 66 Misc 2d 299, 300 .) … (City of Albany v. McMorran, 16 A D 2d 1021 [3d Dept.]; Sleepy Hollow Val. Comm. v. McMorran, 27 A D 2d 665; Matter of Brown v. McMorran, 23 A D 2d 661; Kaskel v. Impellitteri, 306 N. Y. 73, 80 .)

Grosvenor & Starr v. Phillips

2 Hill & Den. 147 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1841

(Vid. the opinions of the judges in Patten v. Thompson, 5 Maule & Selw. 350; Vertue v. Jewell, 4 Campb. 31; Cuming v. Brown, 9 East, 506; Cross on Lien, 252.) … Holbrook v.

Dollard v. Bowdoin

148 Misc. 42 · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 1933

March v. Beam, 117 App. Div. 374 ; modfd., 188 N. Y. 266 .) … Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 216 N. Y. 732 .)

Robbins v. Victor Rubber Co.

21 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 17 · Clark County Court of Common Pleas · May 13, 1918

It is maintained on'behalf of the plaintiff that our own Supreme Court, in the case of Industrial Commission v. Brown, 92 O. S., 309, has decided adversely to the claim of the defendant. … The court is further of the opinion that the matter is clearly decided, adversely to the claim of the defendant, by the Supreme Court of Ohio, in the case of Industrial Commission v. Brown, 92 O. S., 309.

Willard v. Holmes

21 N.Y.S. 998 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Feb 6, 1893

Y. 645 ; Bank v. Graham, 100 U. S. 699 ; Railway Co. v. Harris, 122 U. S. 597 , 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1286; Williams v. Insurance Co., 57 Miss. 759 ; Carter v. Machine Co., 51 Md. 290 ; Wheless v. Bank, 1 Baxt. 469 ; Reed v. … Brown, 28 Iowa, 37 ;) and “malice,” in law, comprehends, not only as in the ordinary meaning of the term, a malevolent intention to injure another in his person, property, or good repute, but also any wanton or reckless disregard

Wilson v. Commercial Telegram Co.

3 N.Y.S. 633 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1888

Brown, J. … Bryant v. Telegraph Co., 17 Fed. Rep. 825; Stock Exchange v. Board, 15 Fed. Rep. 847; Stock Exchange v. Telegraph Co., 22 Fed. Rep. 25.

Empire State Savings Bank v. Beard

88 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 184 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1894

Juris. §§ 1091, 1094; 1 Perry on Trusts [3d ed.], § 207; Charitable Corporation v. Sutton, 2 Atk. 405; 9 Mod. 349; Joint Stock Discount Co. v. Brown, L. R. [8 Eq.] 381; Bank v. Hill, 56 Maine, 385; 96 Am. … (Brinckerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139 : Brinckerhoff *194 v. Bostwick, 105 N. Y. 567, 571 ; New York & N. H. R. R. Co. v. Schuyler, 17 id. 592 .)

Marsh v. Adams

171 Misc. 414 · New York Supreme Court · May 23, 1939

Thus the street would be thrown open to retail stores (Moubray v. G. & M. Improvement Co., supra), boarding houses (Smith v. Scoville, supra; Mischlich v. Lubin, 182 App. Div. 703 ; Gallon v. … (Rickerson v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 149 N. Y. 307 ; Kitching v. Brown, 180 id. 414, 420 .) The plaintiffs’ objection to defendants’ Exhibits A and B is overruled.

People ex rel. Aikins v. Superintendent & Board of Managers of the State Industrial School

33 Misc. 396 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1900

In People v. Johnson, 110 N. … Loughlin v. Finn, 87 N.

Hoehmann v. Moss Engraving Co.

23 N.Y.S. 787 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 5, 1893

Morris v. Brown, 111 N. Y. 318 , 18 N. E. Rep. 722. A mere inspection of the apparatus showed that it was intended for a freight, and not a passenger, elevator, as all the witnesses in this case agree. … Dougan v. Transportation Co., 56 N. Y. 1 ; Cleveland v. Steamboat Co., 68 N. Y. 306 ; Loftus v. Ferry Co., 84 N. Y. 455 ; Stringham v. Hilton, supra; Lafflin v. Railroad Co., 106 N. Y. 136 , 12 N. E. Rep. 599.

Burr v. Bates

3 Ohio C.C. 1 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1887

Umsted v. Buskirk, supra; Brown v. Hitchcock, supra. 7. … Umsted v. Buskirk, supra; Brown v. Hitchcock, supra. 8. That no creditor can acquire priority or institute a separate suit against any or all the stockholders to enforce the statutory liability on his own behalf.

Nance v. Town of Oyster Bay

54 Misc. 2d 274 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1967

(Downing v. Marshall, 37 N. Y. 387 ; Irving v. DeKay, 9 Paige, 533 ; Wetmore, Ex’r, v. Parker, 52 N. Y. 450 .) ” (See, also, Woodruff v. New York, Lake Erie Western R.R. Co., 129 N. Y. 27 , 30; Sprague v. Ticonic Nat. … Brown, Inc. v. Board of Assessors, 4 A D 2d 926; Gerzof v. Sweeney, supra).

Berson v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Rocky Hill

26 Conn. Supp. 475 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Jan 10, 1967

Most recently, the case of Ward v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 153 Conn. 141 , has reviewed the applicable law. … Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 143 So. 2d 58 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.); Miami v. Walker, 169 So. 2d 842 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App.). They have also been upheld in New Jersey. Schmidt v.

Hider v. City of Portland Planning Board

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 14, 2012

The Board has sufficient interest in the outcome of this dispute, since it concerns the constitutionality of its own procedures, to remain as a party to the case. See Nisbet v. … Niutton Hill Estates, Inc. v. Oakland, 468 A.2d 989, 992 (Me. 1983)_.

Newman v. Newman

129 Misc. 784 · New York Supreme Court · May 12, 1927

Steel; 200 shares Tonawanda Board & Paper Company, in trust and for the benefit of my wife, Lilhan D. … (McLouth v. Hunt, 154 N. Y. 179 ; Woodruff v. Woodruff, 54 App. Div. 414 .) As to interpretation, see Browne v. Murdock ( 12 Abb. N. C. 360 ); Equitable Trust Co. v. Miller ( 197 App. Div. 391 ; affd., 233 N. Y. 650 ).

People ex rel. Sinnott v. Board of Trustees of the New York & Brooklyn Bridge

7 N.Y.S. 806 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1889

A similar rule of the board of police in New York, directing the testimony to be taken before a single commissioner, has been upheld by the general term of the first department. People v. … Board of Police, 20 Hun, 402 ; People v. Commissioners, 23 Hun, 351 .