Case law

People v. Marx

10 Misc. 2d 1053 · New York County Courts · Dec 5, 1957

Saunders v. Supervisors , 1 Sheld. 517; People ex rel. Ransom v. Supervisors, 78 N. Y. 622 [1879]; People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Supervisors, 3 How. Prac. [N. S.] 1, 3, affd. 39 Hun 654 , opinion in 4 N. Y. Crim. … Brown v. Supervisors, supra; Matter of Reilly v. Berry, supra.)

Hanson Aggregates Pennsylvania Inc. v. College Township Council

75 Pa. D. & C.4th 255 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County · Oct 25, 2005

Inc. v. Spring Township Board of Supervisors, 787 A.2d 1105, 1108 (Pa. Commw. 2001) (citing Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550, 554 , 462 A.2d 637, 639 (1983)). … See LaRock v. Board of Supervisors of Sugarloaf Township, 866 A.2d 1208, 1212 (Pa. Commw. 2005).

Persch v. Allison

32 N.Y.S. 885 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1895

BROWN, P. J. … *886 agreement by the representations of the defendant that said company was “the owner, licensee, patentee, and had control of the necessary patents to use and operate automatic telephone exchanges by automatic switch boards

Budd v. Jackson

26 How. Pr. 398 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1863

By the court, Brown, Justice. … mentioned in the complaint, $400 for principal, with the interest thereon from May 4th, 1862 ; third, that the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant at the time of the commencement of the action in the sum of $48 for board

Watts v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 3, 2013

First, the Court is not convinced that this argument has been preserved, as it does not appear to have been presented to the Board. See New Eng. ll/hitewater Ctr., Inc. v. … Warren Co. v. Board of Environmental Protection, 2005 ME 27, 868 A.2d 210, for this proposition.

Caldwell v. County Commissioners

8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 56 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 11, 1897

We refer to the case of Board of Education v. State, 51 O. S., 531. … We think Board of Education v. State, supra, is decisive in this action; that the legislature cannot proceed to legislate in this manner.

Calder Race Course, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County

42 Fla. Supp. 129 · Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County · Mar 18, 1975

Holl v. Talcott, Fla. 1966, 191 So.2d 40 ; Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, Fla. 1965, 175 So.2d 780 ; Producers Fertilizer Co. v. Holder, 2d Fla. App. 1968, 208 So.2d 492 . … See also Brown v. City of St. Petersburg, 11 Fla. 718 , 153 So. 141 ; Ramsey v. City of Kissimmee, 139 Fla. 107 , 190 So. 474 . *137 16.

Moline Public Schools, Board of Education, Dist. No. 40 v. State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 327 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 8, 1974

Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement System v. State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 302 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 8, 1973

Richards v. Westcott

2 Bosw. 589 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 13, 1858

(Orange County Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 85,118 ; Pardee v. Drew, 25 Wend. 460 ; Hawkins v. Hoffman, 6 Hill, 588 ; Grant v. Newton, 1 E. D. Smith, 98, and cases cited; The Great Northern Rail-way Co. v. Shepherd, 14 Eng. … As, for example, in Gibbons v. Paynton, (4 Burr. 2298,) where gold was concealed in an old nail-bag. In Riley v. Horne, supra.; and in Batson v.

Buszkiewicz v. State

2 Ill. Ct. Cl. 394 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 17, 1915

How then can it be claimed that the State is liable for the acts of the Board of South Park Commissioners?” In Johnson v. State, 1 C. of C. … Counsel for claimant has referred us to the recently decided case of Brown v. City of Decatur, 188 Ill.

Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Colchester Towne Condominium Council of Owners Board of Directors

58 Va. Cir. 463 · Virginia Circuit Court · Apr 24, 2002

See Transamerica Commercial Finance v. F/V Smilelee, 944 F.2d 186, 189 (4th Cir. 1991) (restating the principle that a preferred mortgage lien has priority over all claims, with exceptions). … In HomeSide Lending v. Unit Owners Assn. of Antietam Square Condominium, 261 Va. 161 (2001), the Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether, under Va.

People v. McElvaney

36 Misc. 316 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Nov 15, 1901

Brown v. Supervisors, 4 N. Y. Crim. 102; People ex rel. Ransom v. Board of Supervisors, 78 N. Y. 622 . … True, the court has no power by a supposed equitable construction to broaden the scope of the statute (People v. Kennedy, 70 N. Y.

Kretschmann v. Board of Education of the Corning Painted Post School District

187 Misc. 2d 246 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 31, 2001

In the earlier action Kretschmann v Board of Educ. ( 184 Misc 2d 535 [Sup Ct, Steuben County 2000]), the plaintiff’s complaint against the defendant, Stetson-Dale, was dismissed *248 based on plaintiffs failure to comply … The third case cited in Rogan v Sear-Brown Group (supra) was Yonkers Contr. Co. v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp. ( 93 NY2d 375 [1999]).

United Traction Co. v. Smith

115 Misc. 73 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1921

In the case of Public Service Commission v. Hurtgan, 91 Misc. Rep. 432 at page 435, Mr. Justice Brown graphically outlines the cases in which a license must be obtained. … Co. v. Whalen, 191 App.

Martin v. Bigelow

36 Misc. 298 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1901

Pirie v. Chicago T. & T. Co., 182 U. S. 438 . … Duncan v. Landis, 5 Am. Bank. Rep. 649-674.

Spitzer v. Village of Fulton

33 Misc. 257 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1900

It may enact that the electors of a village may determine what parts of the General Village Law shall apply to their village (Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 N. … Scott v. Twombly, 20 Misc. Rep. 652 . The act is constitutional. Bank of Rome v. Village of Rome, 18 N. Y. 38 ; Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 id. 467; Smith v. Proctor, 130 id. 319.

Bethlehem Poster Advertising & Sign Corp. v. City of Bethlehem

2 Pa. D. & C. 307 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County · Feb 13, 1922

Justice Brown places the decision in that ease upon the following quotation from Crawford v. … In Com. v.

King v. Phillips

1 Lans. 421 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1868

(Mumford v. Brown, 1 Wend., 52 .) In cases within the second class, one tenant in common cannot enter and occupy, with or without force, so long as his co-tenant is in the actual possession. (Erwin v. … occupied it for piling boards upon; and that defendant entered and removed plaintiff’s boards, as he -lawfully might.

King v. Power Authority

76 Misc. 2d 725 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1973

(Litchfield v. Bond, supra, p. 78 ).” (New York State Environmental Facilities Corp. v. Young, 66 Misc 2d 299, 300 .) … (City of Albany v. McMorran, 16 A D 2d 1021 [3d Dept.]; Sleepy Hollow Val. Comm. v. McMorran, 27 A D 2d 665; Matter of Brown v. McMorran, 23 A D 2d 661; Kaskel v. Impellitteri, 306 N. Y. 73, 80 .)