Case law

Battista v. Power

29 Misc. 2d 711 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1961

With respect to the first relief there are two groups of parties who are necessary parties: the Board of Elections and the objectants. … Y. 681 ) and also recently in Matter of King v. Cohen ( 293 N. Y. 435 ).

Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Commonwealth

89 Va. Cir. 446 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Oct 5, 2004

Accordingly, adoption constitutes the Board’s act in voting for the regulation. … Without this, the regulation becomes effective as originally adopted by the Board. No further Board action is necessary for the regulation to become effective unless there is an amendment.

Leemhuis v. State

155 Misc. 2d 531 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1992

Additionally, the Board of Elections determined that the independent nominating petition was invalid. … Monahan, 42 NY2d 1074 ; Matter of Irvin v Sachs, 129 AD2d 827 ; Matter of Sheehan v Aylward, 84 AD2d 602 ).

Spinning v. Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co.

2 Disney (Ohio) 336 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Oct 15, 1858

Gibson; 8 do. 388, Parker v. Browning; 9 do. 372, Albany City Bank v. Schermerhorn; 1 Clarke’s Chan. 297, same case. In the late case of Taylor et al. v. … A case very similar is found in 4 Gill & John. 497, Brown v.

Norton v. Southern Railway Co.

138 Misc. 784 · City of New York Municipal Court · Dec 16, 1930

Stat. at Large, 731) the United States Shipping Board was authorized to create and organize the corporate entity known as the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation. (Lembeck v. U. S. S. B. E. F. … McCarl, 275 id. 1; United States v. Brown, 247 N. Y. 211 .) It, therefore, comes, without question, within the purview of section 741.

Budd v. Jackson

26 How. Pr. 398 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1863

By the court, Brown, Justice. … mentioned in the complaint, $400 for principal, with the interest thereon from May 4th, 1862 ; third, that the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant at the time of the commencement of the action in the sum of $48 for board

Thornton v. City of Cincinnati

4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 31 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Apr 5, 1904

Brown, for plaintiff in error. John V. Campbell and Charles J. Hunt, contra. … State v. Mitchell. 31 O. S., 592; Tone v. Columbus, 39 O. S., 281.

State v. Cincinnati Tin & Japan Co.

11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 587 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1901

This was a valid lease, the state board of public works, under the act of 1866, having been granted this right. » Second. … Judge Ranney, in Kelley v.

People of New York ex rel. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

69 Misc. 1 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1910

State Board of Tax Comrs., 199 N. Y. 162 ; People ex rel. Lehigh Valley R. Co. v. State Board of Tax Comrs., 199 id. 167 . … Co. v. State Board of Tax Comrs., 114 N.

Board of Trustees of the State Employees' Retirement System v. State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 302 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 8, 1973

Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. State Board of Real Property Services

196 Misc. 2d 211 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 2003

(hereinafter, the State Board). … burdensome (see, Blank v Schafrann, 180 AD2d 886, 887-888 [3d Dept 1992]; Lemer v 300 W. 17th St.

Kistler v. Faller

8 Pa. D. & C.2d 682 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · May 25, 1956

will not be sustained: Sotter v. … In Wilson v.

Gorayeb v. Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 25, 2023

Dep't ofRegulatory Agencies, Div. ofIns., 849 P.2d 6, 19-22 (Colo. 1993); Brown v. McGarr, 774 F.2d 777, 782-85 (7th Cir. 1985). … Ficarra, 849 P.2d at 21-22; Brown, 774 F.2d at 782-85. Scope of the Hearing.

Nass v. Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 21, 2022

See Cayer .v. Town of Madawaska, 2016 ME 143, <ff 24 n.3, 148 A.3d 707; Annable v. Bd. of Envt'l Prat., 507 A.2d 592,594 n.5 (Me. 1986).  The Board, on March 7, 2022, moved to dismiss the petition because (1) Dr. … Bryant v. Town of Camden, 2016 ME 27, ~ 10, 132 A.3d 1183.

Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Colchester Towne Condominium Council of Owners Board of Directors

58 Va. Cir. 463 · Virginia Circuit Court · Apr 24, 2002

See Transamerica Commercial Finance v. F/V Smilelee, 944 F.2d 186, 189 (4th Cir. 1991) (restating the principle that a preferred mortgage lien has priority over all claims, with exceptions). … In HomeSide Lending v. Unit Owners Assn. of Antietam Square Condominium, 261 Va. 161 (2001), the Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether, under Va.

Wise v. Morgan

13 Daly 402 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 28, 1885

Brown, 68 N. … Fox, the court remarking in the latter case that the prior cases of Turk v. Ridye ( 41 N. Y. 201 ); Hutchings v. Minor ( 46 N. Y. 456 ); Merrill v. Green ( 55 N. Y. 270 ); and Simpson v. Brown ( 68 N.

Sussman v. Lakesite Hotel Corp.

145 Misc. 815 · New York County Courts · Nov 17, 1932

(Bolles v. Duff, 35 How. 481 .) “ These same rules apply to an action to foreclose a second mortgage. (Browning v. Stacey, 52 App. … (Browning v. Sire, 56 App. Div. 399 .)

Dorsett v. J.J. White Inc.

80 Pa. D. & C.4th 370 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 24, 2007

On the date of the incident, co-worker Gregory Brown testified that it was raining and that after clocking out at approximately 5:15 p.m., he and the plaintiff boarded the truck, described as a cargo van. … Campagna v. Rogan, 829 A.2d 322, 327 (Pa. Super. 2003).

Barauski v. State

24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 347 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 14, 1963

Hearings were held before the State Police Merit Board relative to the charges filed against claimant, and, by order and decision of that Board, dated March 23, 1959, claimant was discharged. … Claimant filed an application for judicial review of the decision of the State Police Merit Board, and, after a hearing, the Circuit Court of Bureau County, Illinois, reversed the findings of the Merit Board.

Law v. Leighty

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 431 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1903

(Commissioners of Mahoning County v. Railway Co., 45 O. S., 401). But' we are referred to Sections 845 and; 863, Revised Statutes, as specifically 'authorizing the bringing of this action. … Section 845, so far 'as it is material to the issues in this case, reads as follows: “The board of commissioners shall be capable of suing and being sued, pleading -and being impleaded, in any court of judicature, and of