Case law

People v. Newhauser

197 Misc. 54 · New York City Magistrates' Court · Oct 14, 1949

(Matter of Mooney v. Cohen, 272 N. Y. 33 [1936]; Matter of Brown Printing Co., 285 N. Y. 47 [1941]; New Orleans Water Works Co. v. New Orleans, 164 U. S. 471 .) … (People v. Lewis, 295 N. Y. 42 [1945] ; People v. Sell, 310 Mich. 305 .) In People v. Lewis ( 295 N.

Jones v. Scudder

2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 178 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Apr 15, 1872

But, besides the fact that he speaks of ‘fstock” and “college,” from which we might fairly infer the fact of incorporation, our Supreme Court have expressly decided, in Brown v. … R., 16 How. 314 ; Debenham v. Ox, 1 Ves. Sr. 276; Gray v. Hook, 1 Comst. 449; Fuller v. Dame, 18 Pick. 472 .

In re Appointment & Fixing of Salary of Controller's Clerks by Salary Board

11 Pa. D. & C. 307 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County · Mar 12, 1928

Justice Pell in Mulholland v. Wood, Brown & Co., 166 Pa. 486, 490 , “the original meaning of the word clerk has become so enlarged that in modem usage it may [even] include a salesman in a retail store.” … board to remain as heretofore fixed by that board.

Wimer Condemnation

56 Pa. D. & C.2d 230 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County · Nov 29, 1971

Vague and indefinite recitals are not sufficient to put a purchaser on inquiry outside the record: Pyles v. Brown, 189 Pa. 164, 169 , 42 A. 11, 13 (1899). … When an owner neglects to record his title, every presumption is in favor of the subsequent purchaser: Pyles v. Brown, supra.

Balano v. Town of Kittery, Planning Board

Superior Court of Maine · May 11, 2016

See Witham Family Ltd. v. … Waiver: Comprehensive Plan The Town argues that Balano ' s remaining arguments were not raised before the Board and are therefore waived. See Brown v.

Kenefick v. Co-operative Building Bank

62 Misc. 519 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1909

Until such payment is shown the relation between the plaintiff and the defendant could not partake of the character of a partnership (West Point Foundry Assn. v. Brown, 3 Edw. Ch. 284 ; Schantz v. Oakman, 163 N. … The Court of Appeals in Marvin v. Brooks, 94 N.

Pease Oil Co. v. Monroe County Oil Co.

78 Misc. 285 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1912

Dwight v. Eckert, 117 Penn. 490 ; 12 Atl. Rep. 32 ; Brooklyn Oil Refinery v. Brown, 38 How. Pr. 444 ; Rogers & Rogers v. Van Hoesen, 12 Johns. 221 . … In Brooklyn Oil Refinery v. Brown, 38 How.

Augat v. Dowling

161 Misc. 2d 225 · New York Supreme Court · May 20, 1994

(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231.) The court does not and need not find that due process hearings are required in every licensing situation. … It appears that under New York law a doctor, a jockey, a baker, a payroll guard, a tow truck driver (Matter of Brown v Murphy, 34 Misc 2d 151 ), a garbage man, and a boiler engineer have a constitutionally protected interest

People ex rel. New York Central & Hudsonn River Railroad v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

124 N.Y.S. 276 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1910

This application is made to remove nine actions co review the special franchise assessments of the relator on Park avenue, in the city of New York, made by the State Board of Tax Commissioners for the years 1900 to 1908, … It is substantially claimed by the counsel for the State Board that, because the Attorney General makes the application under section 293 of the consolidated tax law (Consol.

Fitzgerald v. Sanitation District No. 6 of Town of Hempstead

89 Misc. 2d 1078 · Long Beach City Court · Apr 13, 1977

of notice of claim with, and examination by, public corporations is to enable them to properly investigate the facts, marshal evidence and adjust differences where possible so as to avoid needless litigation (Matter of Brown … v Board of Trustees, 303 NY 484 ) and not to make coclaimants aware of each others’ testimony.

Miller v. Long Island University

85 Misc. 2d 393 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1976

F2d 334 [a probationary policeman discharged from the Police Department of City of New York]); Lombard v Board of Educ. of City of N. … (Cf. also other jurisdictions, viz.: Robinson v Davis, 447 F2d 753, cert den 405 US 979 ; Bright v Isenbarger, 445 F2d 412; Blackburn v Fisk Univ., 443 F2d 121; Browns v Mitchell, 409 F2d 593; Rowe v Chandler, 332 F Supp

People v. Flynn

32 Misc. 2d 155 · New York Court of General Session of the Peace · Jan 18, 1962

Y. 591 ; People v. Nesce, 201 N. Y. 111 ; People v. Brown, 153 App. Div. 234 ; People v. Graves, 31 Hun 382 ; People ex rel. Gerhrmann v. Osborne, 79 N. J. Eq. 430, 439). … S. v. Murray, 275 U. S. 347 ; and Cook v. U. S., 275 U. S. 347 ) ”. (See, also, People v. Thuna, 266 App. Div. 223, 225 , supra.)

Howe v. Robinson

34 N.Y.S. 85 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 3, 1895

Foote v. Beecher, 78 N. Y. 155 ; Woodruff v. McGrath, 32 N. Y. 255 ; Ward v. Kilpatrick, 85 N. Y. 413, 417 ; Tenney v. Berger, 93 N. Y. 524, 531 . … E. 1034 ), and regarding the receipt in the light of an agreement in writing, to vary the terms of which parol evidence was not admissible (Coon v. Knap, 8 N. Y. 402 ; People v. Board of Managers, etc., 96 N.

People v. Crowley

142 Misc. 2d 663 · New York Justice Court · Jan 17, 1989

(People v Brown, 70 Misc 2d 224, 228 , supra, quoting American Law Institute Model Penal Code, Tentative Draft No. 8, at 5.) … (People v Brown, 70 Misc 2d 224, 227 , supra; 7 Zett, New York Crim Prac, at 63-68.)

Eleventh Ward Bank v. Heather

21 Misc. 539 · City of New York Municipal Court · Oct 15, 1897

Co. v. Sternfeld, N. Y. Law Journal, Jan. 7, 1897; Moyer v. Moyer, 7 App. Div. 528 ; Importers & Traders’ Nat. Bank v. Quackenbush, 143 N. Y. 567 . The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.

Freeman v. Manns

87 Va. Cir. 64 · Roanoke County Circuit Court · Aug 14, 2013

The Court’s Decision in Jenkins v. Johnson Is Dispositive In Jenkins v. … Therefore, consistent with the Court’s holding in Jenkins v. Johnson, the Plaintiff in this case is not bound by the proof of paternity requirements ofVa. Code § 64.1-5.1(4). B.

North Baptist Church v. Parker

36 Barb. 171 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1862

By the Gourt, Brown, J. The plaintiff is a religious corporation, duly organized under the statute, and has been in existence since the 9th day of March, 1841. … In the case of Mickles v.

McCalmont Township v. Carlson

12 Pa. D. & C. 330 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County · Apr 29, 1929

We must hold, however, that the mere averment in paragraph 4 that “the tax was duly levied by the Board of Supervisors of the said Township of MeCalmont,” and the further averment in paragraph 5 that “this claim is filed … Brown, Brookville, Pa.

Grim v. Reitnauer

63 Pa. D. & C.2d 450 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Mar 6, 1973

The fact that they were parties to the suit does not disqualify them as expert witnesses on their own behalf: Brown, Pennsylvania Evidence (1949) page 125; O’Neill v. Atlas Auto. Finance Corp., 139 Pa. … Stores Co. v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & Review, et al., 441 Pa. 556 (1971).

Rivera v. YMCA of Bethlehem

34 Pa. D. & C.5th 250 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County · Oct 29, 2013

In counts IV, V, and VI of the amended complaint, plaintiff alleges false-light invasion of privacy against YMCA, Brown, and Camasta, respectively. … In Petula , the plaintiff averred that *257 the defamatory statements were made to “representatives and board members’ of certain named school districts.” Id.