Case law

Hochstrasser v. Martin

16 N.Y.S. 558 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1891

Francis v. Schoellkopf, 53 N. Y. 152 ; Van Buren v. Water-Works Co., (Sup.) 3 N. Y. Supp. 336 ; Barrick v. Schifferdicker, (Sup.) 1 N. Y. Supp. 21 . … In Brown v. Railroad Co., 12 N. Y. 492 , Denio, J., says: “Every continuance of a nuisance is, in judgment of law, a fresh nuisance.”

Owens v. Hanse

51 Misc. 2d 471 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1966

of the Town of Babylon (hereinafter referred to as the Town Board) and the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Deer Park Fire District (hereinafter referred to as the Fire District). … [c]; Matter of Brown v. McMorran, 42 Misc 2d 211 ).

Dlabola v. Manhattan Railway Co.

8 N.Y.S. 334 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Feb 3, 1890

On the 12th March, 1888, plaintiff took passage on board of ■one of defendant’s cars at Seventy-Sixth street and Third avenue, to be transported down town. … Brown v. Railroad Co., 34 N. Y. 404 ; Johnson v. Railroad Co., 20 N. Y. 65 ; Fero v. Railroad Co., 22 N. Y. 213 ; Webber v. Railroad Co., 109 N. Y. 314 , 16 N. E. Rep. 358.

Abney v. Wimer

60 Va. Cir. 87 · Virginia Circuit Court · Jun 3, 2002

Graybeal v. Board of Supervisors, 216 Va. 77, 80 , 216 S.E.2d 52, 54 (1975). … Sutter v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 932 F. Supp. 753, 759 (E.D. Va. 1996) (citing Brown, 209 Va. at 568 , 165 S.E.2d at 399 ).

Corbit v. Nicoll

9 N.Y. St. Rep. 525 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jun 26, 1887

Browne, J. … Whitney v. Union Trust Co., 65 N. Y., 577 .

People ex rel. National Exchange Bank v. Stupp

2 N.Y.S. 537 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1888

People v. Brown, 55 N.Y. 180 . … People v. Board, 64 N. Y. 600 ; People v. Wendell, 71 N. Y. 171 .

Freeman v. Manns

87 Va. Cir. 64 · Roanoke County Circuit Court · Aug 14, 2013

The Court’s Decision in Jenkins v. Johnson Is Dispositive In Jenkins v. … Therefore, consistent with the Court’s holding in Jenkins v. Johnson, the Plaintiff in this case is not bound by the proof of paternity requirements ofVa. Code § 64.1-5.1(4). B.

Overton v. President & Board of Trustees of the Village of Olean

44 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 47 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1885

The village, through the president and board of trastees, as commissioners of highways, may bring an action for that purpose with a view to the preservation of the street. (Laws 1855, chap. 255; Osborn v. I. C. and A. … Jur., § 1095 ; Davenport v. Dows, 18 Wall., 626 ; Everingham v. Vanderbilt, 51 How., 177 ; Greaves v. Gouge, 52 id., 58; affirmed, 69 N. V., 154; Bate v.

National Radiator Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad

6 N.J. Misc. 778 · New Jersey Circuit Court · Jun 21, 1928

McGregor v. Erie Railroad Co., 35 N. J. L. 89; Messenger v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., *782 37 Id. 531; Atwater v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., 48 Id. 55. … In the case of Great Western Railway Co. v. Sutton (L. R.), 4 H. L. 226, cited in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co., 145 U. S. 277 , and in Scofield v. Lake Shore and M. S.

Callanan v. Gilman

67 How. Pr. 464 · The Superior Court of New York City · Sep 15, 1884

[Browne], 245). It has long been held by the courts of this state that any unauthorized continuous obstruction of a public highway or street is a public nuisance (Davis agt. The Mayor, &c., 14 N. Y., 506 ; Trenor agt. … The board of aldermen cannot authorize a public nuisance (Trenor agt. Jackson, supra; Ely agt. Campbell, 59 How., 333 ; People agt. Mayor, 59 id., 277; People agt.

Howe v. Robinson

34 N.Y.S. 85 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 3, 1895

Foote v. Beecher, 78 N. Y. 155 ; Woodruff v. McGrath, 32 N. Y. 255 ; Ward v. Kilpatrick, 85 N. Y. 413, 417 ; Tenney v. Berger, 93 N. Y. 524, 531 . … E. 1034 ), and regarding the receipt in the light of an agreement in writing, to vary the terms of which parol evidence was not admissible (Coon v. Knap, 8 N. Y. 402 ; People v. Board of Managers, etc., 96 N.

Perry v. Lansing

24 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 34 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

The more important and difficult objection relates to the charge of the learned judge on the subject of concurrent negligence of the plaintiff and those on board of the tug Bliss. … An intimation to the contrary, in Brown v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co. (32 id., 602) is obiter and explained in Robinson v. N. Y. C. and H. R. R. R. Co. (supra). The case of Armstrong v. Lancashire, etc., R. R. Co. (12 Eng. Rep.

Ronning v. Thompson

130 Misc. 2d 101 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1985

Brown, J. By a prior decision of this court, the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Bolton was determined to be invalid, and the condominium proposed by the petitioners was found to be subject to subdivision approval. … (On reargument, October 18,1985) By notice of motion and supporting papers, the petitioners move to reargue that portion of a decision of this court, dated January 4, 1985, which found that the Town of Bolton Planning Board

Weller v. Hersee

17 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 431 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1877

(Ross v. Sadgbeer, supra.) … In Draper v. Snow ( 20 N.

Balano v. Town of Kittery, Planning Board

Superior Court of Maine · May 11, 2016

See Witham Family Ltd. v. … Waiver: Comprehensive Plan The Town argues that Balano ' s remaining arguments were not raised before the Board and are therefore waived. See Brown v.

Taylor v. New System Prosthetic Dental Laboratory, Inc.

12 Ohio Law. Abs. 54 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Jul 1, 1932

The reasoning of the Kansas Court has been followed in the case of State Board of Dental Examiners v Savelle, 8 Pac. 2d, 693 ,*! by the Colorado Supreme Court. … v State Board, 214 Mich., 369 ; State v Board of Dental Examiners, 96 Ore., 529 ; State Board of Dental Examiners v Pollock, 125 Okla., 170 ; State v Brown, 37 Wash., 97 ; Lawrence v Board of Registration, 239 Mass., 424

Taylor & Boggis Foundry Co. v. International Molders Union of North America

20 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 161 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Jun 22, 1917

The membership of the strike committee and of the conference board is practically the same. … Baumgartner, William Brown, John Langley and Richard Kennedy, and all the members of the strike committee and conference board and their successors in office (by whatever name called), and associates active in the actual

Peck v. Bonner

1 Rec. Co. Ct. 31 · New York County Court, Suffolk County · Jan 30, 1672

hath heard the said Bonner pretend before that, he durst not go out -with out a Pilot, or some other ship or vessell in company, And further the said Bonner said to the Seamen, that if they would go to Sea, he would put mr Browne … This was only the beginning of a long course of litigation between Ashton, Lawton, and Bonner; for which see Ashton v. Bonner on p. 141 below, and subsequent entries.]

O'Gara v. Joseph

202 Misc. 28 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1952

Brown, J. … Lodes v. Department of Health, 189 N. Y. 187 ). There, the court said, at page 192: “ In the case of Metropolitan Board of Excise v. Barrie ( 34 N.

Construction Contractors Ass'n of Hudson Valley, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Orange Community College

149 Misc. 2d 440 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1991

Indeed, the court in V. J. Gautieri, Inc. v County of Ontario (Sup Ct, Ontario County, index No. 76380, Reuben K. … (Gerzof v Sweeny, 16 NY2d 206 .)