Case law

In re the Arbitration between Duskin Sales, Inc. v. Rosenberg Bros.

38 Misc. 2d 210 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1962

The petitioner asserts that he and his attorney when they attended the arbitration on October 2 appeared only for the purpose of challenging the jurisdiction of the arbitration board. … Brown, 120 Misc. 349 ; Matter of Big-W Constr. Corp. [Horowitz], 24 Misc 2d 145, 156 , affd. 14 A D 2d 817).

August v. Smith

1 Pa. D. & C. 804 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County · Dec 5, 1921

The place of delivery is clearly indicated to be on board the car at seller’s mines. … Brown, Brookville, Pa.

Ferrelli v. Leach

89 Ohio Law. Abs. 545 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Aug 8, 1962

Section 4141.28, Revised Code; The Brown Brockmeyer Co. v. Roach, 148 Ohio St., 511, 518 . … Super., 74, 117 A. (2d), 799; Pozniak v. Board of Review, 194 Pa. Super., 179, 166 A. (2d), 71; Valles v. Board of Review, 194 Pa. Super., 47, 166 A. (2d), 108; Zelek v. Board of Review, 194 Pa.

Egling v. Lombardo

181 Misc. 108 · Rochester City Court · Jun 2, 1943

(Claflin v. Houseman, 93 U. S. 130 . To the same effect is Miles v. Illinois Central R. R. Co., 315 U. S. 698 .) … Div. 221 ; Holman & Co. v. Graham, 165 Misc. 389 ), including a liability created by statute (Halkin v. Hume, 123 Misc. 815 ; Horowitz v. Winter, 129 Misc. 814 ; Goldwater v. Mendelson, 170 Misc. 422 ).

Peurrung Bros. & Co. v. Compton, Ault & Co.

6 Ohio C.C. 483 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1892

The defendants had been selling up to the time of the bringing of this suit, and now have in their possession a large quantity of matches marked as set out in plaintiffs’ petition ; that is, they are a square match with brown … colored heads, put up in brown paste-board boxes, marked in fancy black letters peculiarly arranged on the back of the box, “ The Acorn Parlor Match.”

Levine v. New York State Department of Social Services

106 Misc. 2d 496 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1980

, 220 US 506 ; Matter of Levine v Whalen, 39 NY2d 510 ; People v Klinck Packing Co., 214 NY 121 ; Matter of New York Edison Co. v Maltbie, 244 App Div 436 ; Brown v University of State of N. … Corp., 291 NY 19 ; Komar v Dun & Bradstreet Co., supra); add to the statute (Matter of Rosenbluth v Finkelstein, 300 NY 402 ; Matter of Cherry v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N.

Board of Trustees of Cabell County General Hospital v. Department of Health

15 Ct. Cl. 69 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1984

Frycek v. Corning Inc.

171 Misc. 2d 220 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1997

(Brown v Two Exch. Plaza Partners, 76 NY2d 172 .) This motion for summary judgment against Amthor Steel is granted. … (Murphy v Board of Educ., 104 AD2d 796 , affd 64 NY2d 856 ; Franz v Dregalla, 94 AD2d 963, 964 .) The court has considered the reasoning set forth by Justice Ferradino in Majewski v Broadalbin-Perth Cent.

Metz v. West Virginia State Board of Probation & Parole & Department of Corrections

13 Ct. Cl. 292 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1980

Finney v. Zingale, 95 S.E. 1046 , 82 W.Va. 422 (1918). … But, as said in Polonsky v. Penn. R.

DeRolph v. State

98 Ohio Misc. 2d 1 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Perry County · Feb 26, 1999

DeRolph v. State, 78 Ohio St.3d at 213 , 677 N.E.2d at 747 . The Supreme Court of Ohio has acknowledged its responsibility for determining *256 what is a constitutionally adequate educational system. DeRolph v. … See Campbell v. Wyoming (Dec. 31, 1997), Laramie Cty., Wyo. District Court No. 129-59.

Mercantile Trust Co. v. Atlantic Trust Co.

33 N.Y.S. 252 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1895

It is urged that this contract is one which the officers of the corporation could not execute without the authority of the board of trustees. … People v. Brown, 55 N. Y. 180 .

Broadway Sav. Inst. v. Town of Pelham

31 N.Y.S. 402 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1894

BROWN, P. J. … Starin v. Town of Genoa, 23 N. Y. 439 ; People v. Mead, 36 N. Y. 224 ; Town of Venice v. Woodruff, 62 N. *404 Y. 463 ; Cagwin v. Town of Hancock, 84 N. Y. 532 ; Craig v. Town of Andes, 93 N. Y. 405 .

People ex rel. Williamsburgh Gas-Light Co. v. Board of Assessors

23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 196 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

The counsel for the relator cites the cases of Bailey v. R. Co. ( 22 *198 Wall., 604 ), and Brown v. … Co. v. Supervisors of Erie, 4 Comst., 442; People v. Supervisors, 4 Hill, 20 ; Bank of Utica v. City of Utica, 4 Paige, 399 ; People v. Supervisors of N. Y., 18 Wend., 605 .)

Corbit v. Nicoll

9 N.Y. St. Rep. 525 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jun 26, 1887

Browne, J. … Whitney v. Union Trust Co., 65 N. Y., 577 .

Elliott v. Shore Stop, Inc.

10 Va. Cir. 147 · Norfolk County Circuit Court · Jul 10, 1987

The friend, at plaintiff’s instance, took the test and "signed and dated [the same] as ‘Wanda Brown’.” (Plaintiff) (Par. 20 Motion for Judgment). She admits she "had Ms. … As to Counts V and VI, the demurrers are sustained for the reasons set forth above.

Rein v. Wagner

49 Misc. 2d 683 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1965

Y. 692 ; Brown v. Bendix Aviation Corp., 76 N. Y. S. 2d 422, affd. *687 274 App. Div. 1049 ; see, also, Matter of King Metal Prods., v. Workman’s Compensation Bd., 20 A D 2d 565; cf. Evans v. … Brown Bros. Co., 208 N. Y. 90 ; Gillet v. Bank of America, 160 N. Y. 549 ; Wilson & English Constr. Co., v. New York Cent. R. R., Co., 240 App. Div. 479 ).”

Miller v. Village of Brookville

54 Ohio Law. Abs. 193 · Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 27, 1948

The testimony is clear that council appointed a Park Board of three. … P. 340, 342; Gilfillin v. Koke, 1 W. L. M. 704; Harmon v. Whittemore, 1 Bull 109; Early v. Doe, 16 How. 610 , 14 L. Ed. 1079 ; Merves v.

Beck v. East River Ferry Co.

6 Rob. 82 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 15, 1868

Indeed, even in a case of injury from the collision of vehicles, a late case in the Court of Appeals, (Brown v. N. Y. Central R. R. Company, 32 N. Y. … (Wilds v. Hudson River R. R. Co., 29 N. Y. Rep. 326 . S. C. 24 id. 430 . Ryan v. Fowler, Id. 410 . Sherman v. Rochester and S. R. R. Co., 17 id. 173. Boldt v. N. Y. Central R. R. Co., 18 id. 432.)

National 56 Corp. v. McIntyre

38 Misc. 2d 905 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1963

Trojan Realty Corp. v. Purdy ( 174 App. … Horton v. Ferguson, 120 App. Div. 563 ; People ex rel. Brown v. O’Rourke, 31 id. 583 .) ” Petitioner in its answering affidavit does not deny the notice and its failure to attend the hearing.

Hochstrasser v. Martin

16 N.Y.S. 558 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1891

Francis v. Schoellkopf, 53 N. Y. 152 ; Van Buren v. Water-Works Co., (Sup.) 3 N. Y. Supp. 336 ; Barrick v. Schifferdicker, (Sup.) 1 N. Y. Supp. 21 . … In Brown v. Railroad Co., 12 N. Y. 492 , Denio, J., says: “Every continuance of a nuisance is, in judgment of law, a fresh nuisance.”