Case law

New York Automobile Co. v. Franklin

49 Misc. 8 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1905

The three upon which the greatest stress is laid are Keokuk Packet Co. v. Davidson, 95 Mo. 467 ; Averill v. Barber, 6 N. Y. Supp. 258 ; and Blake v. Buffalo Creek R. R. Co., 56 N. Y. 485 . In Keokuk v. … In Averill v.

Dayton v. Harmon

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 574 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1897

which requires county commissioners to keep in repair all parts of roads within municipal corporations to a point where the sidewalks have been curbed and guttered and no further; and it is alleged that the sidewalks upon Brown … Stat., 89 O. h. 102, the board of city affairs of Dayton is clothed with the exclusive control of the streets and bridges of the city.

State Board of Funeral Directors v. Beaver County Funeral Directors Ass'n

10 Pa. D. & C.2d 704 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jan 31, 1957

In our judgment, the very question involved in this case has been passed upon by our Supreme Court in State Board of Undertakers v. Joseph T. … L. 1053, 66 PS §1431, which provided that: “... any party to the proceedings affected thereby may appeal therefrom to the Superior Court”: Arsenal Board of Trade v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 166 Pa.

M.C. v. S.H.

51 Va. Cir. 63 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Oct 25, 1999

Brown v. Lukhard, 229 Va. 316, 321 (1985). … Albemarle County Supervisors v. Marshall, 215 Va. 756, 761 (1957).

MacDade v. Reilly

3 N.J. Misc. 49 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Jul 1, 1924

Brown, alleging that the defendants had possession of a certain Packard automobile belonging to the deceased, Charles J. Reilly, at the time of his death. … In the case of Buttlar v. Buttlar, 67 N. J.

Matter of Brown-Alleyne v. New York City Hous. Auth.

2026 NY Slip Op 30804(U) · New York Supreme Court, Kings County · Mar 4, 2026

Matter of Brown-Alleyne v New York City Hous. … Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222 [1974]).

Price v. Price

40 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 69 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

Brody v. P. J. Leamy

90 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1977

Saunders v Creamer, 464 Pa 2; Brown v Pitchess, 13 Cal 3d 518, supra; Williams v Horvath, 16 Cal 3d 834; Alberty v Daniel, 25 ILL App 3d 291; Dudley v Bell, 50 Mich App 678 ; Silvermann v University of Colorado, 36 Col App … Yet, a careful reading of these decisions indicates that only two courts have fully developed the issues by review of Congressional intention and historical background (Chamberlain v Brown, supra; Brown v Pitchess, supra)

Hallman v. Village of Port Edward

26 Misc. 422 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1899

Brown, of Watertown, to try and determine. … Gage v. Village of Hornellsville, 106 N. Y. 667 ; Stanton v. Town of Taylor, 45 N. Y. St. Repr. 906; § 81, chap. 414, of the Laws of 1897.

Adkins v. Myers

15 Ohio Misc. 91 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Apr 18, 1968

In Markowski, a Taxpayer, v. … In State ex rel. v. Brown, 1 Ohio St. 2d 121 , the court said: ■ “Of course, the wisdom of legislation is not subject to judicial inquiry and legislative enactments are presumptively constitutional.”

Fitzpatrick v. County of Orange

45 Misc. 3d 238 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2014

Arroyo v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 110 AD3d 17 [2013]). Petitioners do contend, however, that the resolution adopted was contrary to law and the illegality of a legislative resolution is a matter for the court. … The limitations period for a challenge of a legislative resolution is four months (see Gress v Brown, 20 NY3d 957 [2012]; Solnick v Whalen, 49 NY2d 224 [1980]).

Sweeney v. Commonwealth

10 Va. Cir. 101 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Apr 2, 1987

I have also read and considered the ten exhibits in a brown binder, labelled "Exhibits For Third Step Manager’s Review" as well as the memoranda filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion. … Both sides cite State Board of Health v.

Dayton v. Horstman

77 Ohio Law. Abs. 570 · Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas · Jul 22, 1957

Sherrill v. Brown, 155 Oh St 607; State, ex rel. Gamble v. Duffy, 164 Oh St 231. … Reutener v. Cleveland, 107 Oh St 117.

Udut v. Nyquist

63 Misc. 2d 1066 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1970

Gaines v. Canada, 305 U. S. 337, 349 .) May 17, 1954, in Brown v. Board of Educ. ( 347 U. S. 483 ) Mr. … (Matter of Balaban v. Rubin, 14 N Y 2d 193, 199, cert. den. 379 U. S. 881 ; followed: Matter of Strippoli v. Bickal, 21 A D 2d 365, 368, affd. 16 NY 2d 652 .)

People ex rel. A. T. & S. F. R. Co. v. State Board of Equalization

1 Colo. N. P. 128 · Pueblo County District Court · Jul 9, 1901

It is true that in the case of Bean v. The People, 6 Colo, page 98, some expressions are indulged in, which appear to be inconsistent with the views here expressed. … The decision in Bean v.

In re Sugar Creek Local School District

90 Ohio Law. Abs. 257 · Putnam County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 22, 1962

INDIANA: Humphries v. McAuley, 187 N. E., 262 (defect in voting machine causing some ballots not to register); Brown v. Grzeskowiak, 101 N. E. (2d), 639; KANSAS: Olson v. Fleming, 254 P. (2d), 335 ; Parker v. … W. (2d), 348 ; Mehrens v. Election Canvassing Board, 278 N. W., 252 (nonresident voters); NORTH CAROLINA: People v. Teague, 11 S.

Delafield v. Union Ferry Co.

10 Bosw. 216 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 31, 1863

(Wilds v. Hudson River R. R. Co., 24 N. Y. R., 430; Ernst v. Same, 24 How. Pr., *219 97 ; 8 Com. Bench, N. S., 568-572.) … (Brown v. Bradshaw, 1 Duer, 199, 206 ; Goodyear v. Ogden, 4 Hill, 104 ; Wright v. Orient Mut. Ins. Co., 6 Bosw., 269 -280.)

Schieffelin v. Komfort

86 Misc. 678 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1914

Boren v. Smith, 47 Ill. 482 ; People ex rel. Wheaton v. Wiant, 48 id. 263; Dickey v. Reed, 78 id. 261; Sweatt v. Faville, 23 Ia. 321 ; Gibson v. Board of Supervisors of Trinity Co., 80 Cal. 359 ; Ellingham v. Dye, 99 N. … Deister v. Wintermute, 194 N. Y. 99 ; People ex rel Stapleton v. Board, etc., 199 id. 175 ; People ex rel. Judson v. Thacher, 55 id. *691 525; People ex rel. Smith v. Pease, 27 id. 45; People v. Cook, 8 id. 67.

Harbor & Suburban Building & Savings Ass'n v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.

79 Misc. 150 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1913

It relates to the restoration of an existing condition (Matter of Board of Public Works, 144 N. Y. 444 ), and includes new roofing, new plumbing and what *154 ever is resonably necessary to keep up a house. Stephens v. … In Brown v. Broadway & Seventy-second St. R. Co., 131 App.

M. P. Acee Co. v. Allegheny County

18 Pa. D. & C.2d 449 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Jul 9, 1958

Brown, J., This is an action in mandamus brought by plaintiffs against the Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County. … Kelley v. Pommer, 330 Pa. 421 ; and Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Board of Revision of Taxes, 372 Pa. 468, 472 .