Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.34s
Brown v. Town of Old Orchard Beach
Superior Court of Maine · Jan 26, 2004
CV-02-340 ye Soo 4 poe } ERIC BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs V. ORDER TOWN OF OLD ORCHARD BEACH, VAN 30° 3404 Defendant The six plaintiffs are among the residents of Arnold Road in Old Orchard Beach. … The Town filed an answer with a counterclaim alleging that the septic system of the plaintiffs Eric Brown and Wendy Brown was located within the right of way of Arnold Road.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished98 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 178 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1895
Brown, P. J.: The applicant, during the year 1891, was the register of the county of Kings, and as such caused certain conveyances and mortgages recorded in his office to be lexicographically indexed. … The second contention of the respondent is that no funds have *181 been provided by the board of estimate of the city of Brooklyn and county of Kings for the payment of the work.
Cited 0 timesPublished72 Misc. 469 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1911
It was said in the case of Lafond v. Deems, 81 N. … Johansen v. Blume, 53 App. Div. 526 , citing Niblack, Mut. Ben. Soc., § 111. See also Matter of Brown v. Supreme Court, 66 App. Div. 262 ; Shirtcliffe v. Wall, 68 id. 376 ; Poultney v. Bachman, 31 Hun, 49 ; Thomas v. M.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Bethlehem v. Wilson
208 Misc. 70 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1955
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Smith v. Board of Town Auditors of the Town of Delhi
12 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 647 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1875
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Cayuga Nation of Indians v. Board of Commissioners of Land Office
41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885
The board of commissioners admit by the opinion of the attorney general, which they adopted, that they undoubtedly have jurisdiction in the matter under the statute above cited. … Certainly the State may give power to the board of commissioners to hear the matter, even though otherwise it would be a matter only for the legislative power; and the respondents admit their power to be undoubted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHott v. Department of Highways
11 Ct. Cl. 3 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jul 30, 1975
GARDEN, JUDGE: Although this claim was originally filed on behalf of “Hott and Miller, General Contractors”, it developed at the hearing that this entity was actually a partnership consisting of Brown Hott and Harold Miller … In the spirit of liberality, we permitted an amendment to reflect the name of the claimant as being “Brown Hott and Harold Miller d/b/a Hott and Miller, a partnership.” 1971 the Department of Highways had undertaken certain
Cited 0 timesPublished52 Ohio Law. Abs. 321 · Montgomery County Probate Court · Jul 15, 1946
E. 2nd 796, Syllabus 1; Imhoff v. Imhoff, 12 O. O. 285; 41 O. Jur. 783, Sec. 655; 16 O. Jur. 476, Sec. 97; 16 O. Jur. 483, Sec. 103; 16 O. Jur. 487, Sec. 106; Blair v. Brown, 25 O. … E. 422 ; Gladding v. St. Matthew’s Church (1904) 25 R. I. 628, 65 L. R. A. 225. In Bowden v. Brown, 200 Mass. 269 , 86 N.
Cited 1 timesPublished2 Daly 319 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Jun 15, 1868
of January and February, both his brothers, his sister and his father searched diligently for him, by inquiring at all the places where he used to visit,' of the person with whom he last worked, of the one with whom he boarded … Thompson, 1 Hilt. 551 ; Houstman v. Thornton, 1 Holt N. P. C. 242; Watson v. King, 1 Starkie, 121; Green v. Brown, 2 Str. 1199).
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lentilhon
64 Misc. 299 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1909
Wood v. Colvin, 5 Hill, 230 ; Colt v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 54 N. Y. 595 .
Cited 0 timesPublished37 Misc. 614 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1902
Herman v. Merchants’ Ins. Co., 81 N. Y. 185 ; Blackman v. Striker, 142 id. 555. … Brown v. Volkening, 64 N. Y. 76 ; Phelan v. Brady, 119 id. 587. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover at the rate of $266.66 per month from January, 1891, to March,/1893, and thereafter at the rate of $400 per month.
Cited 1 timesPublished131 Misc. 2d 432 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1986
(See, e.g., Hastings v Brooklyn Life Ins. … Co., 138 NY 473, 479 [1893]; Traitel Marble Co. v Brown Bros., 159 App Div 485, 487 [1st Dept 1913]; Rothman & Schneider v Beckerman, 2 NY2d 493 [1957]; Miners & Merchants’ Bank v Ardsley Hall Co., 113 App Div 194, 203 [1st
Cited 2 timesPublished72 Misc. 2d 104 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1972
apportionment of defendant board unconstitutional (Franklin v. … A number of other State courts have rejected weighted voting* (Brown v. State Election Bd., 369 P. 2d 140 [1962, Oída.]; Cargo v. Campbell, No. 33273, U. S. Dist. Ct., Sante Fe County, N. M., 1964; Jackman v.
Reversed by Franklin v. Krause, 32 N.Y.2d 234 (1973)Cited 7 timesPublished126 Misc. 2d 522 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1984
Brown, J. … moves for an order, pursuant to Public Health Law § 4138 changing the birth certificate of Nicole Marie Santor to show that John Collins, Jr. is her father, and that her name is Nicole Marie Collins, an order requiring the Board
Cited 0 timesPublishedStawski v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
7 Misc. 2d 424 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1957
The testimony referring to the presence on board of *427 armed members of the Irgun strongly indicates that the latter was the situation. … . * * * There was nothing trivial about the blows inflicted upon the insured by Brown. Such blows were no mere slaps in the face or mild push which might have caused a person to slip and *428 fall.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFirestone v. First District Dental Society
59 Misc. 2d 362 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1969
Matter of Cherry v. Board of Regents, 289 N. Y. 148 .) … (Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U. S. 563 ; Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U. S. 589 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedShrine of Our Lady of Martyrs of Auriesville v. Board of Assessors of Glen
54 Misc. 2d 145 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1967
Co. v. City of New York ( 282 N. … Luke’s Hosp. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Hotchkiss v. Smith
137 N.Y.S. 177 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1912
This is a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus, directed to the board of elections of Putnam county, requiring *179 said board to disregard certain provisions of the Election Law (Con-sol. … In the matter of Burke v. Terry, 203 N. Y. 293 , 96 N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. New York & Rockaway Beach Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
79 Misc. 135 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1913
Co. v. Woodbury, 203 N. Y. 167 , because the occupation by the railroad of the locus in quo was prior to that by the highways, and the parties have so stipulated. … Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 174 N.
Cited 2 timesPublished18 Pa. D. & C.3d 138 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County · Feb 6, 1981
And in Brown v. Brown, supra, and Meadows v. Meadows, 619 P. 2d 598 (Okla. 1980), the exemption was construed so as not to apply to a claim for the support of the recipient’s dependents. … To that extent, that position is correct: Brown v. Brown, supra. However, the estate admits that John P. Christinis had no dependents.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna