Case law

Porter v. Board of Plumbing Supervision of Department of Health

43 Pa. D. & C. 616 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 10, 1942

Superior Ct. 548, 565 (1927) ; Ward’s Appeal, 289 Pa. 458, 465 (1927) (holding board of zoning appeals nonviolative of article III, sec. 20). The case of Moll v. … McGovern et al., 316 Pa. 161 (1934) (retirement board valid): Borough of Lansdowne et al. v. The Public Service Commission, 74 Pa.

Hirsch v. City of Philadelphia

17 Pa. D. & C.2d 461 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 12, 1958

And in Bradley v. … In Abel v.

Bates v. Conklíng

10 Wend. 389 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1833

A question somewhat analogous arose in The People v. Onondaga Com. Pleas, 7 Cowen, 492, 3. … In Brown v. Howard, 14 Johns. R. 122, Ch. J.

Board of Water Commissioners for City of Detroit v. Burr

3 Jones & S. 522 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 7, 1873

These had to be furnished before the contractors could perform their part of the contract (Young v. Hunter, N. Y. R. p. 206-7; Stewart v. Keteltas, 36 N. Y R. p. 390; Allamon v. … Mayor, etc., of Albany, 43 Barb. p. 33; Goodwin v. Holbrook, 4 Wend. 377 ).

People ex rel. Jones v. New York State Division of Parole

168 Misc. 2d 937 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1996

No evidence or contraband was found on the suspect, although a brown paper bag containing narcotics was on the ground in the general vicinity. … (Ashe v Swenson, 397 US 436, 443 [1970].)

E. & S. Motor Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Alcohol Permit Board

11 Pa. D. & C. 345 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 15, 1928

Imperial Woolen Co., 261 Pa. 312 , quoted in Altoona Beverage and Ice Co. v. Pennsylvania Alcoholic Permit Board, 11 D. & C. 60. It was pointed out in Premier C. & B. Co. v. … Repr. (2nd) 1000; Chicago Grain Products Co. v. Blair, 12 Fed. Repr. (2nd) 90; Ma-King Co. v. Blair, 271 U. S. 479 .

Ain Leasing Corp. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

166 Misc. 2d 902 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1995

"New York has substantially adopted the approach of the original Restatement of Torts (1939) to the law of trade secrets (Eagle Comtronics v Pico, Inc., 89 AD2d 803, 804 , lv denied 58 NY2d 601 ; Ferranti Elec. v Harwood, … Co. v Technical Tape Corp., 23 Misc 2d 671, 678-679 , affd 15 AD2d 960 , affd 18 AD2d 679 ).

National Institute For Human Relationships v. Board Of Governors of State Colleges & Universities

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 763 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jun 29, 1983

The program covered 1974-75 academic year of Northeastern Illinois University which is operated under the authority of Respondent Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities.

Orange County v. Johnson

72 Va. Cir. 529 · Circuit Court of the 9th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Orange County · Feb 16, 2007

Her argument is premised on the holding of the Supreme Court of Virginia in Forrer v. Brown, *530 221 Va. 1098 , 277 S.E.2d 483 (1981); however, the court is not persuaded that this case supports Fletcher’s position. … The Delinquent Taxes On this question, the case of The Lester Group v.

Union County Commissioners v. Brunner

146 Ohio Misc. 2d 40 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Feb 19, 2008

Brown, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW {¶ 1} This is a case about legal authority. … Co. v. Ayres (1943), 142 Ohio St. 216, 222 , 27 O.O. 176 , 51 N.E.2d 636 , and paragraph two of the syllabus; see also State ex rel. Ruggles v. Howser (May 2, 1988), Brown App. No. 87-11-0017, 1988 WL 41496 . .

Dows & Car v. Cobb

12 Barb. 310 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1851

In the case of Brown v. … P., Stanton v. Eager, 16 Pick. 467 .) In the case of Walley v.

Hop & Wine Beverages, L.L.C. v. Virginia Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control

85 Va. Cir. 124 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Jul 18, 2012

See Browning-Ferris Industries v. Residents Involved in Saving the Environment, Inc., 254 Va. 278, 284 , 492 S.E.2d 431 (1997). The Appellees severally argue the instant appeal presents mixed questions of law and fact. … As such, if this analysis were correct, the ABC Board’s opinion would be entitled to substantial evidence deference. Browning-Ferris, 254 Va. at 284 .

Commonwealth ex rel. United Cigar Stores Co. v. Board of Revision of Taxes

3 Pa. D. & C. 283 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 7, 1923

That the Board of Revision refused to entertain its appeal on the ground that as a tenant it did not come within the purview of the appealing statutes, and, therefore, it filed this petition. … The motion of the Board of Revision of Taxes to supersede the writ of alternative mandamus is granted and the writ is quashed.

People ex rel. Mott v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Greene

12 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 650 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1875

Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 10 v. United Bus Corp.

62 Misc. 2d 959 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1970

People ex rel. Ryder v. Clerk of Board of Supervisors of Kings County

27 N.Y.S. 857 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1894

BROWN, P. J. This appeal presents the question whether, under the general town law, (chapter 569, Laws 1890,) the term of office of supervisors in the towns of Kings county was one or two years.

Marine & Fire Insurance Bank v. Early

1 Charlton 279 · Chatham Superior Court, Ga. · Jan 15, 1830

Early; that Early went into possession in pursuance of said agreement; that the bond and mortgage were never made, and titles never passed; 1 that Early is insolvent, and his effects assigned to Brown, for the benefit of … See also, Brown vs. Gilman, 4 Wheaton’s Rep. 291-2 & note (a.)—(Ed.)

People ex rel. Flanagan v. Board of Police Commissioners of the Police Department

31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 383 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1881

Supervisors of Kings v. Walter

6 Thomp. & Cook 338 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1875

The defendant, while sheriff of Kings county, having the custody and being the keeper of the common *340 jail, presented, from time to time, Ms accounts for the board of persons confined therein, including his fees for receiving … Cummings v. Brown, 43 N. Y. 514 ; 19 Wend. 383 . This action is brought after the time so limited.

In re the Construction of an Indenture Made by Edison

4 Misc. 2d 13 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1956

subdivision 26 to section 235 of the Banking Law, permitting savings banks to invest in preferred stocks, guaranteed stocks, common stocks, and shares of investment companies, subject to regulations made by the banking board … (Matter of Daly, 203 Misc. 851 ; Matter of Brown, 1 Misc 2d 234 .)