Case law

Smith v. Board of School Directors of Southern Fulton School District

44 Pa. D. & C.2d 20 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County · Aug 3, 1967

The nature of the suit is a mandamus action to compel the board of school directors to cancel occupation taxes levied by the said school board against plaintiff for five school tax years. … taxes: Pennsylvania Bar Association Endowment v.

Evert v. Elk County Board of Assessment & Revision of Taxes

37 Pa. D. & C.2d 1 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Elk County · Apr 15, 1965

is prescribed by the statutes: Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Company v. … Such is not only the power of the board but its mandatory duty.

Harran Transportation Co. v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2

71 Misc. 2d 139 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1972

(See Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd., Town of Brighton, 1 N Y 2d 508, 520; see Matter of Meyer v. Board of Educ., 31 Misc 2d 407 ; Matter of Caruci v. Dulan, 41 Misc 2d 859 .) … (Matter of Buffalo Audio Center Arrolite Co. v. Union Free School Dist., 29 Misc 2d 871 , affd. 15 A D 2d 991; Matter of Garber v. Board of Educ., 50 Misc 2d 711 .)

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

101 Misc. 2d 910 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1979

Y., 22 AD2d 870 , affd 16 NY2d 935 ; Matter of Peterson v Board of Assessors of Town of Westport, 25 AD2d 797 ). … Hotel Paramount Corp. v Chambers, 298 NY 372 ; Westbury Drive-In v Board of Assessors of County of Nassau, 70 Misc 2d 1077, 1081 , affd 45 AD2d 821 ; Long Is. Light.

Harnois v. Lamont

83 Va. Cir. 473 · Norfolk County Circuit Court · Nov 4, 2011

Andrews v. Ring, supra. … Welvaert, Danielle Cason, Phillip Hollowell, Esq., the School Board of the City of Virginia Beach and any member thereof, Bessianne T. Maiden, Esq., the personal representative of Kenneth V.

Kiwanis Club of Great Neck, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Kiwanis International

83 Misc. 2d 1075 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1975

The associational rights which our system honors permit all white, all black, all brown, and all yellow clubs to be formed. They also permit all Catholic, all Jewish, or all agnostic clubs to be established. … (Legislative Conference of City Univ. of N.Y. v Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y., 38 AD2d 524 .)

Suckley v. Delafield

2 Cai. Cas. 221 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1804

Brown v. Show, 1 Caines’ Rep. 489. To constitute a breach of the warranty in this clause, a condemnation on pretence of illicit trade, &c., is not enough: there must, it would seem, be a trading in fact, (Johnston v. … Tucker v. Juhel, 1 Johns. Rep. 20.

Kummer v. City of Cincinnati

6 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 559 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jun 24, 1905

Nulsen et al v. The City of Cincinnati et al, recently decided by this court (5 C. C.—N. … Brown, for plaintiff. Frank H. Kunkel, for the city.

Coburn v. Odell

30 N.H. 540 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1855

Pray v. Burbank, 10 N. H. Rep. 377 ; Caldwell v. Wentworth, 14 N. H. Rep. 431 ; Lewis v. Welch, 14 N. H. Rep. 294 ; Roby v. West, 4 N. H. Rep. 287 . … Whitlock, 1 Cow. 290 ; Schermerhorn v. Loines, 7 Johns. 311 ; Thompson v. Percival, 5 B. & Ad. 925; Reed v. White, 5 Esp. 122; Brown v. Kewley, 2 B. & Pul. 518.

Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Cheltenham Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

13 Pa. D. & C.2d 697 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Dec 9, 1957

Under these provisions the board has no discretion to rule against applicant. There is no change to a use for a district having less restrictive regulations. See Molnar v. George B. … Bechman, 352 Pa. 79 (1945); Firth v. Scherzberg, 366 Pa. 443 (1951); Davis Appeal, 367 Pa. 340 (1951); Transicoil Corp. *702 v. Worcester Township Board of Adjustment, 72 Montg. 155 (1955). In Humphries v.

Cincinnati National Bank v. Tilden

73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 635 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1893

reversed and order to be entered directing receiver to pay to counsel for respondents the sum of fifty dollars for services in procuring appointment of receiver, and to pay the balance of fund in his hands to appellant, Thomas Brown

Delaware County Mortgage & Finance Co. v. Delaware County Board of Commissioners

79 Pa. D. & C. 110 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Oct 25, 1951

Plaintiff, however, contested the redemption and filed an action of mandamus against the Delaware County Board of Commissioners demanding a deed to the premises. … This court would have no jurisdiction over costs on appeal: Commonwealth v.

People ex rel. Hanrahan v. Board of Police of the Metropolitan Police District

35 Barb. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1861

We have been referred to The People v. Finger ( 24 Barb. 341 ) as decisive of this question. … Whether the relator, upon the organization of the board of police under the act of 15th of April, 1857, withdrew from the police force established by said act, and disclaimed holding office or doing duty as a member of the

Trustees for Christ & St. Luke's Episcopal Church v. Zoning Appeals Board

69 Va. Cir. 457 · Norfolk County Circuit Court · Jan 23, 2006

Prince William County Board of Zoning Appeals v. Bond, 225 Va. 177, 179 , 300 S.E.2d 781, 782 (1983) citing Packer v. Hornsby, 221 Va. 117, 120 , 267 S.E.2d 140, 141 (1980); Alleghany Enterprises v. … See also Lamar v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 270 Va. 540 , 620 S.E.2d 753, 757 (2005).

Crook v. Crook

1 Balt. C. Rep. 515 · Baltimore City Orphans' Court · Jan 3, 1805

The question in this case is: Have the petitioners (the said Eugenia Helena Crook and Mary Rose Brown), the legal right to caveat the will of William Thompson?

In re Tax Appeal of State College Children's House, Inc.

30 Pa. D. & C.3d 570 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County · May 16, 1984

Robert Morris College v. Board of Property Assessment, 5 Pa. Commw. 648 , 291 A.2d 567 (1972). *575 SCCH cites Appeal of Woods Schools, 195 Pa. … Robert Morris College v. Board of Property Assessment, 5 Pa. Commw. 648 , 291 A.2d 567 (1972).

Wink v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Birdsboro

34 Pa. D. & C.3d 654 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · May 20, 1985

King v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Nazareth, 76 Pa. Commw. 318, 320 , 463 A.2d 505 (1983) (Citations omitted). … Pyzdrowski v.

Farmland Industries, Inc. v. City of Reading Zoning Hearing Board

27 Pa. D. & C.3d 371 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Dec 30, 1982

Cook v. Marple Tp. Zoning Hearing Board, 55 Pa. Commw. 535, 540 , 423 A.2d 1105, 1107 (1980). … Bray v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 48 Pa. Commw. 523 , 410 A. 2d 909 (1980). As defined in Heck v. Zoning Hearing Board for Harvey’s Lake, 39 Pa.

Davlee Construction Corp. v. Brooks

26 Misc. 2d 240 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1960

See United States v. Title Ins. Co., 265 U. S. 472, 484 ; Richmond Co. v. United States, 275 U. S. 331, 340 ; Cheater v. Cater, [1918] 1 K. B. 247, 252-253; London Jewellers, Ld., v. Attenborough, [1934] 2 K. … (See, also, Brown v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 184 Misc. 693, 700, 701 ; People v. Railway Express Agency, 188 Misc. 342, 344 ; Rohrbach v. Germania Fire Ins. Co., 62 N. Y. 47, 58 .)

Board of Education of the Northport-East Northport Union Free School District v. Ambach

107 Misc. 2d 830 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1981

(Brown v Board of Educ., 347 US 483 .) “But importance of a service performed by a State does not determine whether it must be regarded as fundamental for purposes of examination under the Equal Protection Clause.” … (Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564 , supra; Greenhill v Bailey, 519 F2d 5, supra.)