Case law

People v. Fish

96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 163 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1895

Brown, P. J., and Pratt, J., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of the Special Term. The opinion of the Special Term was as follows: Gaynor, J.* I think the complaint does not state a cause of action. … By section 272 of the Game Law, which was passed May 5, 1892, all existing laws and ordinances of boards of supervisors for the protection and preservation of fish, game, etc.

Classic Togs, Inc. v. Joint Board of Cloak, Suit, Skirt, Reefer Makers' Union

27 Misc. 2d 598 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1961

Godfrey v. Penns Valley Area School District

22 Pa. D. & C.3d 466 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County · Feb 17, 1981

BROWN, P. … In Phillippi v. School District of Springfield Township, 28 Pa.

Brennan Center for Justice v. New York State Board of Elections

56 Misc. 3d 376 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 10, 2017

. v State of New York, 8 NY3d 14, 28 [2006], quoting Klostermann v Cuomo, 61 NY2d 525, 541 [1984]). … Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v Cuomo, 64 NY2d at 239 ).

Jacobson v. Luzon Lumber Co.

192 Misc. 183 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1948

Historic Estates, Inc., v. United Paper Board Co., ( 260 App. Div. 344 ) is another good example. … Perhaps the most simple,'and at the same time complete, statement of this rule appears in the opening paragraph of the opinion of Brown, J., in Paine v. Chandler ( 134 N. Y. 385, 387 ).

Griffith-Custer Steel Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Johnstown, Inc.

41 Pa. D. & C.2d 125 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County · Jul 30, 1966

The assessment was made by the Sales Tax Board of Review (hereinafter board) on a determination the transaction was a sale. … Brown, president of defendant corporation, disclaims any knowledge of, or that it was given.

People v. Seneca Lake Grape & Wine Co.

5 N.Y.S. 136 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1889

Proceedings for the voluntary dissolution of a corporation may be instituted by the board off directors on the ground of its insolvency. Section 2419. … Dawley v. Brown, 79 N. Y. 390 .

Marsh v. Chamberlain

2 Lans. 287 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1870

(Barnes v. Perinc, 2 Kernan, 18, 24, 28.) … (Union Bank v. Bxecutors of Coster, 3 Com., 203, 209-10; Church v. Brown, 21 N. Y., 315 ; Bainbridge v. Wade, 1 Eng. Law & Eq., 236 ; Bailey v. Freeman, 11 John., 221, 223 .)

Pack v. West Clermont Local School District Board of Education

24 Ohio Misc. 2d 1 · Clermont County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 5, 1985

. * * *” The United States Supreme Court in Board of Regents v. … See Jones v. Board of Edn. (Sept. 17, 1981), Ashtabula C.P. No. 73424, unreported. In re Sergent (1976), 49 Ohio Misc. 36 [ 3 O.O.3d 308 ].

Erie Zoning Bd. of Adjustment v. Seelinger

34 Pa. D. & C.2d 265 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County · Jul 26, 1963

No testimony was taken at the hearing before the zoning board of adjustment, and all that the record before us discloses is that the parties in interest stated their positions to the board, appellants raising objections to … The board, with scarcely a nod toward the rights of the nearby residents, concluded that the inconvenience of parking experienced by the applicant counter-balanced the public interest and, in doing so, the board committed

Donaldson v. Ryder Truck Rental & Leasing

189 Misc. 2d 750 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2001

A person such as plaintiff who is loading or unloading a parked tractor trailer is “using” the vehicle within the meaning of Insurance Law article 51 (see, Walton v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 88 NY2d 211 ; Brown v Mr. … Co.], 76 NY2d 248 ; Brown v Mr. Seconds Bldg. Material, 204 AD2d 1027 , supra; Matter of Briggs v Kansas City Fire & Mar. Ins. Co., 121 AD2d 810 ), and its lien is fixed at $100,277.79.

Altemose Architects & Engineers Associates v. Upper Merion Township Zoning Hearing Board

25 Pa. D. & C.3d 207 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · May 18, 1981

On this appeal from the board’s decision denying the special exception, our scope of review is to decide whether the board has committed an error of law or abuse of discretion: Bocella v. … The reasoning behind this standard is explained in Zoning Hearing Board v. Konyk, 5 Pa.

Luther Forest Corp. v. McGuinness

126 Misc. 2d 556 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1984

Brown, J. … Luther v McDermott ( 265 NY 47 ) and Matter of Whitney Indus, v Board of Assessors ( 48 Misc 2d 422 ), decided before Real Property Tax Law § 480 (3) (a) was amended, are not authority to the contrary.

Akiba Hebrew Academy v. Lower Merion Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

47 Pa. D. & C.2d 171 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Sep 19, 1968

All matters pertaining to special exceptions must be decided by the zoning board of adjustment in accordance with the standards found in the particular zoning ordinance: Kotzin v. … Where an ordinance places the burden of proof on an applicant for a special exception, the zoning board and the courts are required to follow its provisions: York Township Zoning Board of Adjustment v.

Bogan v. Municipal Civil Service Commission

29 Misc. 2d 750 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1960

Y. 780 ; Matter of Nathanson v. Adams, 207 Misc. 572 ; Matter of Brown v. Moses, 191 Misc. 360 ; Matter of Singer v. Graves, 254 App. Div. 37 ). … Masterson v. French, 110 N. Y. 494 ; People ex rel. Brown v. Greene, 106 App. Div. 230 , affd. 184 N. Y. 565 ).” In the Matter of Eberhart v. Robbins (25 N. Y.

Hutchinson v. Skinner

21 Misc. 729 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1897

Board of Education v. Bennett, 54 Barb. 480 . … Wormser v. Brown, 149 N. Y. 163 , at page 172.

Mitchell v. Mitchell

177 Misc. 1050 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1942

(Newman v. Dore, 275 N. Y. 371, 379, 380 ; Krause v. Krause, 285 id. 27, 31, 32; Caldwell v. Caldwell, Id. 655; Schnakenberg v. Schnakenberg, 262 App. Div. 234 ; Murray v. … (LeStrange v. LeStrange, 242 App. Div. 74, 77 ; Rubin v. Myrub Realty Co., Inc., 244 id. 541, 543; Bodner v. Feit, 247 id. 119, 121; Reiss v. Reiss, supra.)

People ex rel. Gorman v. Board of Police of the Metropolitan Police District

35 Barb. 527 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1861

The old officers continued or remained in office, under the new law and under the new board, by virtue of the act of the legislature. (The People ex rel. McCune v. The Board of Police, &c., 19 N. Y. Rep. 188 .) … of police constituted thereby, prior to the 3d day of July, 1857, or up to the time when that tribunal pronounced the new law to be valid, in the case of The People v.

Bull v. Stichman

189 Misc. 590 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1947

(See Lawson Co., Inc., v. Browne, 266 App. Div. 183 .) This court does not deem the decision in Dairy Sealed, Inc., v. Ten Eyck ( 248 App. Div. 352 ) as holding to the contrary. … (See Judd v. Board of Education, 278 N. Y. 200, 203, 218 ; Schieffelin v. Komfort, 212 N. Y. 520, 526-528 ; New York League For Separation of Church and State v. Graves, 170 Misc. 196, 198 ; Matter of Goldstein v.

Steinhardt v. Palm Beach County

46 Fla. Supp. 2d 62 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Apr 16, 1991

See State Dept. of Environmental Regulation v Brown, 449 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), pet. for review denied, 459 So.2d 1039 (Fla.). … The decision of the Environmental Control Board is affirmed in so far as it found Petitioner had violated Fla. Admin. Code Rule 10D-9.21(1).